Rankings for Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth Decoupling
83
Lu Z, Wang H, Qiang Y (2011) Decoupling indicators: quantitative relationships between resource
use, waste emission and economic growth. Resour Sci 33(1):2–9 (in Chinese)
MAyDS (2017) Cuadernillo Inventario Gases de Efecto Invernadero Argentina. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable. https://inventariogei.ambiente.gob.ar/files/inventario-nacionalgei-argentina.pdf
Martinez-Alier J, Pascual U, Vivien F-D, Zaccai E (2010) Sustainable de-growth: mapping the
context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecol Econ 69(9):1741–1747
Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York,
NY
OECD (2002) Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth.
Sustainable Development. SG/SD (2002) 1/Final. Organization for economic co-operation and
development
OECD (2009) Declaration on green growth adopted at the meeting of the council at ministerial level
on 25, C/MIN(2009)5/ADD1/FINAL
Peters GP, Minx JC, Weber CL, Edenhofer O (2011) Growth in emission transfers via international
trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc Nat Acad Sci 108:8903–8908
Ren S, Hu Z (2012) Effects of decoupling of carbon dioxide emission by Chinese nonferrous metals
industry. Energy Policy 43:407–414
Stavins RN (2016) The ever-evolving interrelationship between GDP and carbon dioxide. Environ
Forum 33(4):17
Stokey NL (1998) Are there limits to growth? 39(1):1–31
Tapio P (2005) Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of
road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transp Policy 12(2):137–151
Tarabusi EC, Guarini G (2018) An axiomatic approach to decoupling indicators for green growth.
Ecol Ind 84:515–524
UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth.
United Nations Environment Program. A report of the working group on decoupling to the
international resource panel
UNEP (2016) Emissions gap report 2016. United Nations Environmental Program
UNEP (2017) Emissions gap report 2017. United Nations Environmental Program
Van den Bergh JC (2011) Environment versus growth: A criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for
“a-growth.” Ecol Econ 70(5):881–890
Van den Bergh JC, Antal M (2014) Evaluating alternatives to GDP as measures of social
welfare/progress, WWW for Europe working papers series 56
Wang H, Hashimoto S, Yue Q, Moriguchi Y, Lu Z (2013) Decoupling analysis of four selected
countries: China, Russia, Japan, and the United States during 2000–2007. J Ind Ecol 17(4):618–
629
Wang Z, Yang L (2015) Delinking indicators on regional industry development and carbon
emissions: Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei economic band case. Ecol Ind 48:41–48
Weiss M, Cattaneo C (2017) Degrowth-Taking stock and reviewing an emerging academic paradigm.
Ecol Econ 137:220–230
WRI (2016) The roads to decoupling: 21 countries Are reducing carbon emissions while growing
GDP. World Resources Institute
Zhang M, Wang W (2013) Decouple indicators on the CO 2 emission-economic growth linkage: the
Jiangsu Province case. Ecol Ind 32:239–244
83
Lu Z, Wang H, Qiang Y (2011) Decoupling indicators: quantitative relationships between resource
use, waste emission and economic growth. Resour Sci 33(1):2–9 (in Chinese)
MAyDS (2017) Cuadernillo Inventario Gases de Efecto Invernadero Argentina. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable. https://inventariogei.ambiente.gob.ar/files/inventario-nacionalgei-argentina.pdf
Martinez-Alier J, Pascual U, Vivien F-D, Zaccai E (2010) Sustainable de-growth: mapping the
context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecol Econ 69(9):1741–1747
Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York,
NY
OECD (2002) Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth.
Sustainable Development. SG/SD (2002) 1/Final. Organization for economic co-operation and
development
OECD (2009) Declaration on green growth adopted at the meeting of the council at ministerial level
on 25, C/MIN(2009)5/ADD1/FINAL
Peters GP, Minx JC, Weber CL, Edenhofer O (2011) Growth in emission transfers via international
trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc Nat Acad Sci 108:8903–8908
Ren S, Hu Z (2012) Effects of decoupling of carbon dioxide emission by Chinese nonferrous metals
industry. Energy Policy 43:407–414
Stavins RN (2016) The ever-evolving interrelationship between GDP and carbon dioxide. Environ
Forum 33(4):17
Stokey NL (1998) Are there limits to growth? 39(1):1–31
Tapio P (2005) Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of
road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transp Policy 12(2):137–151
Tarabusi EC, Guarini G (2018) An axiomatic approach to decoupling indicators for green growth.
Ecol Ind 84:515–524
UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth.
United Nations Environment Program. A report of the working group on decoupling to the
international resource panel
UNEP (2016) Emissions gap report 2016. United Nations Environmental Program
UNEP (2017) Emissions gap report 2017. United Nations Environmental Program
Van den Bergh JC (2011) Environment versus growth: A criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for
“a-growth.” Ecol Econ 70(5):881–890
Van den Bergh JC, Antal M (2014) Evaluating alternatives to GDP as measures of social
welfare/progress, WWW for Europe working papers series 56
Wang H, Hashimoto S, Yue Q, Moriguchi Y, Lu Z (2013) Decoupling analysis of four selected
countries: China, Russia, Japan, and the United States during 2000–2007. J Ind Ecol 17(4):618–
629
Wang Z, Yang L (2015) Delinking indicators on regional industry development and carbon
emissions: Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei economic band case. Ecol Ind 48:41–48
Weiss M, Cattaneo C (2017) Degrowth-Taking stock and reviewing an emerging academic paradigm.
Ecol Econ 137:220–230
WRI (2016) The roads to decoupling: 21 countries Are reducing carbon emissions while growing
GDP. World Resources Institute
Zhang M, Wang W (2013) Decouple indicators on the CO 2 emission-economic growth linkage: the
Jiangsu Province case. Ecol Ind 32:239–244