112
M. P. Ramos and O. O. Chisari
Castiglione C, Infante D, Smirnova J (2018) Non-trivial factors as determinants of the environmental
taxation revenues in 27 EU countries. Economies 6(1):7.S
Chisari OO, Galiani S, Miller S (2016) Optimal climate change adaptation and mitigation
expenditures in environmentally small economies. Economia (LACEA) 17(n. 1)
Chisari OO, Miller S, Maquieyra JA (2012) Manual sobre Modelos de Equilibrio General
Computado para Economías de LAC con Énfasis en el Análisis Económico del Cambio Climático.
IDB-TN 445. Países de América Latina y el Caribe con aplicaciones a Cambio Climático”,
Washington, DC, United States. IDB-TN-445, Washington D.C
Chisari OO, Miller SJ (2015) CGE modeling: the relevance of alternative structural specifications for
the evaluation of carbon taxes’ impact and for the integrated assessment of climate change effects:
simulations for economies of Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development
Bank
Ciaschini M, Pretaroli R, Severini F, Socci C (2012) Regional double dividend from environmental
tax reform: an application for the Italian economy. Res Econ 66(3):273–283
Dechezleprêtre A, Glachant M, Ménière Y (2009) Technology transfer by CDM projects: a
comparison of Brazil, China, India and Mexico. Energy Policy 37(2):703–711
De Melo J (2017) Moving on towards a workable climate regime. In: Sustainable growth in the EU,
pp 231–256. Springer, Cham
de Mooij RA (ed) (2000) Environmental taxation and the double dividend. Emerald Group
Publishing Limited
Fan JL, Liang QM, Wang Q, Zhang X, Wei YM (2015) Will export rebate policy be effective for
CO 2 emissions reduction in China? A CEEPA-based analysis. J Clean Prod 103:120–129
Fontagné L, Fouré J (November, 2016a) Changement climatique et commerce: quelques simulations
de politique économique. Premier Ministre
Fontagné L, Fouré J (2016b) Long term socio-economic scenarios for representative concentration pathways defining alternative CO 2 emission trajectories. CEPII Research Report 2016-1.
Available at: http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/fr/publications/rr/abstract.asp?NoDoc=8565
Forsyth T (2007) Promoting the “development dividend” of climate technology transfer: can crosssector partnerships help? World Dev 35(10):1684–1698
Fraser I, Waschik R (2013) The double dividend hypothesis in a CGE model: Specific factors and
the carbon base. Energy Econ 39:283–295
Freire-González J (2018) Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE
modeling literature: a critical review. J Policy Model 40:194–223
Giménez EL, Rodríguez M (2010) Reevaluating the first and the second dividends of environmental
tax reforms. Energy Policy 38(11):6654–6661
Gozlan E, Ramos MP (20–22 November, 2008) Trade liberalization in environmentally preferable
products. Paper presented at the 2008 LACEA/LAMES joint conference. Rio de Janeiro
Grottera C, Pereira AO Jr, La Rovere EL (2017) Impacts of carbon pricing on income inequality in
Brazil. Climate Dev 9(1):80–93
Karydas C, Zhang L (2017) Green tax reform, endogenous innovation and the growth dividend. J
Environ Econ Manage
Kitous A, Keramidas K, Vandyck T, Saveyn B (2016) Global energy and climate outlook (GECO
2016) road from Paris (No. JRC101899). Joint Research Centre (Seville site)
Klenert D, Schwerhoff G, Edenhofer O, Mattauch L (2016) Environmental taxation, inequality and
Engel’s law: the double dividend of redistribution. Environ Resource Econ 1–20
Kolsuz G, Yeldan AE (2017) Economics of climate change and green employment: a general
equilibrium investigation for Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:1240–1250
Koskela E, Schöb R (1999) Alleviating unemployment: the case for green tax reforms. Eur Econ
Rev 43(9):1723–1746
Koskela E, Schöb R (2001) Optimal factor income taxation in the presence of unemployment.
Discussion Paper 758. Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki, Finland
Kuralbayeva K (2015) Environmental policy and the triple dividend in developing economies with
rural-urban migration, mimeo
M. P. Ramos and O. O. Chisari
Castiglione C, Infante D, Smirnova J (2018) Non-trivial factors as determinants of the environmental
taxation revenues in 27 EU countries. Economies 6(1):7.S
Chisari OO, Galiani S, Miller S (2016) Optimal climate change adaptation and mitigation
expenditures in environmentally small economies. Economia (LACEA) 17(n. 1)
Chisari OO, Miller S, Maquieyra JA (2012) Manual sobre Modelos de Equilibrio General
Computado para Economías de LAC con Énfasis en el Análisis Económico del Cambio Climático.
IDB-TN 445. Países de América Latina y el Caribe con aplicaciones a Cambio Climático”,
Washington, DC, United States. IDB-TN-445, Washington D.C
Chisari OO, Miller SJ (2015) CGE modeling: the relevance of alternative structural specifications for
the evaluation of carbon taxes’ impact and for the integrated assessment of climate change effects:
simulations for economies of Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development
Bank
Ciaschini M, Pretaroli R, Severini F, Socci C (2012) Regional double dividend from environmental
tax reform: an application for the Italian economy. Res Econ 66(3):273–283
Dechezleprêtre A, Glachant M, Ménière Y (2009) Technology transfer by CDM projects: a
comparison of Brazil, China, India and Mexico. Energy Policy 37(2):703–711
De Melo J (2017) Moving on towards a workable climate regime. In: Sustainable growth in the EU,
pp 231–256. Springer, Cham
de Mooij RA (ed) (2000) Environmental taxation and the double dividend. Emerald Group
Publishing Limited
Fan JL, Liang QM, Wang Q, Zhang X, Wei YM (2015) Will export rebate policy be effective for
CO 2 emissions reduction in China? A CEEPA-based analysis. J Clean Prod 103:120–129
Fontagné L, Fouré J (November, 2016a) Changement climatique et commerce: quelques simulations
de politique économique. Premier Ministre
Fontagné L, Fouré J (2016b) Long term socio-economic scenarios for representative concentration pathways defining alternative CO 2 emission trajectories. CEPII Research Report 2016-1.
Available at: http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/fr/publications/rr/abstract.asp?NoDoc=8565
Forsyth T (2007) Promoting the “development dividend” of climate technology transfer: can crosssector partnerships help? World Dev 35(10):1684–1698
Fraser I, Waschik R (2013) The double dividend hypothesis in a CGE model: Specific factors and
the carbon base. Energy Econ 39:283–295
Freire-González J (2018) Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE
modeling literature: a critical review. J Policy Model 40:194–223
Giménez EL, Rodríguez M (2010) Reevaluating the first and the second dividends of environmental
tax reforms. Energy Policy 38(11):6654–6661
Gozlan E, Ramos MP (20–22 November, 2008) Trade liberalization in environmentally preferable
products. Paper presented at the 2008 LACEA/LAMES joint conference. Rio de Janeiro
Grottera C, Pereira AO Jr, La Rovere EL (2017) Impacts of carbon pricing on income inequality in
Brazil. Climate Dev 9(1):80–93
Karydas C, Zhang L (2017) Green tax reform, endogenous innovation and the growth dividend. J
Environ Econ Manage
Kitous A, Keramidas K, Vandyck T, Saveyn B (2016) Global energy and climate outlook (GECO
2016) road from Paris (No. JRC101899). Joint Research Centre (Seville site)
Klenert D, Schwerhoff G, Edenhofer O, Mattauch L (2016) Environmental taxation, inequality and
Engel’s law: the double dividend of redistribution. Environ Resource Econ 1–20
Kolsuz G, Yeldan AE (2017) Economics of climate change and green employment: a general
equilibrium investigation for Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:1240–1250
Koskela E, Schöb R (1999) Alleviating unemployment: the case for green tax reforms. Eur Econ
Rev 43(9):1723–1746
Koskela E, Schöb R (2001) Optimal factor income taxation in the presence of unemployment.
Discussion Paper 758. Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki, Finland
Kuralbayeva K (2015) Environmental policy and the triple dividend in developing economies with
rural-urban migration, mimeo