238
C. S. Goh and S. H. J. T. Lee
1. Ketapang Community Carbon Pools (KCCP)
2. Rimba Raya Biodiversity Reserve Project
3. Katingan Peatland Restoration and Conservation Project
4. Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP)
5. Berau Forest Carbon Program
*Google Map was used as the base map
Fig. 11.6 REDD+ sites in Kalimantan
by the polarised views between villagers and villages and the inconsistencies in
government policies as seen in the case of Ketapang and Berau (Anandi et al. 2014;
Intarini et al. 2014). The immediately following question would be who has the
right to benefit from the ‘sales’ of ‘ecosystem services’ (in this case carbon credits)?
The Rimba Raya case that was dominated by a foreign company based in Hong
Kong raises concerns about the real implications of such schemes for local people
(Indriatmoko et al. 2014b). Even for the other programmes, the actual implementations were troubled by uneven distribution of benefits among the local people (Joshi
et al. 2010; Howson and Kindon 2015). Third, tenure uncertainties are another longstanding issue to be solved. The Indonesian government itself has a lot of concerns
in giving out license of managing a large area of land for such projects due to
legal uncertainties and extreme difficulties in managing potential land conflicts, not
to mentioned the underlying political complexity (Indriatmoko et al. 2014a). Last
C. S. Goh and S. H. J. T. Lee
1. Ketapang Community Carbon Pools (KCCP)
2. Rimba Raya Biodiversity Reserve Project
3. Katingan Peatland Restoration and Conservation Project
4. Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP)
5. Berau Forest Carbon Program
*Google Map was used as the base map
Fig. 11.6 REDD+ sites in Kalimantan
by the polarised views between villagers and villages and the inconsistencies in
government policies as seen in the case of Ketapang and Berau (Anandi et al. 2014;
Intarini et al. 2014). The immediately following question would be who has the
right to benefit from the ‘sales’ of ‘ecosystem services’ (in this case carbon credits)?
The Rimba Raya case that was dominated by a foreign company based in Hong
Kong raises concerns about the real implications of such schemes for local people
(Indriatmoko et al. 2014b). Even for the other programmes, the actual implementations were troubled by uneven distribution of benefits among the local people (Joshi
et al. 2010; Howson and Kindon 2015). Third, tenure uncertainties are another longstanding issue to be solved. The Indonesian government itself has a lot of concerns
in giving out license of managing a large area of land for such projects due to
legal uncertainties and extreme difficulties in managing potential land conflicts, not
to mentioned the underlying political complexity (Indriatmoko et al. 2014a). Last