References
Aitken, M., Haggett, C., & Rudolph, D. (2016). Practices and rationales of community engagement
with wind farms: Awareness raising, consultation, empowerment. Planning Theory and Practice, 17(4), 557–576.
Berghöfer, A., Wittmer, H., & Rauschmayer, F. (2008). Stakeholder participation in ecosystembased approaches to fisheries management: A synthesis from European research projects.
Marine Policy, 32, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.09.014. (07-12-2015).
Chen W., Ruldoph, D., Haggett, C., Seifert-Dähnn, I., Golmen, L., Daria, J., Quevedo, E., Grito,
J. H., Ying, F., Lu, S. Y., & Mintenbeck, K. (2014). D6.4 A framework for describing the social
impacts with concrete examples that apply for the Canary Island, EU FP7 TROPOS project.
Haggett, C. (2011). Planning and persuasion: Public engagement in renewable energy decisionmaking. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable energy and the public: From NIMBY to
participation (pp. 15–27). Earthscan: London.
Hall, N., Ashworth, P., & Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Social acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of
four common themes across Australian case studies. Energy Policy, 58, 200–208.
Murgue, C., Therond, O., & Leenhardt, D. (2015). Toward integrated water and agricultural land
management: Participatory design of agricultural landscapes. Land Use Policy, 45, 52–63.
Pilemalm, S., & Timpka, T. (2008). Third generation participatory design in health informatics—
Making user participation applicable to large-scale information system projects. Journal of
Biomedical Informatics, 41(2), 327–339.
Pomeroy, R., & Douvere, F. (2008). The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning
process. Marine Policy, 32, 816–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017. (07-122015).
Rasenberg, M., Stuiver, M., Van den Burg, S., Veenstra, F., Norrman, J., & Söderqvist, T. (2013).
Stakeholder views; deliverable D2.2, MERMAID project.
Rasenberg, M., Stuiver, M., Van den Burg, S., Norrman, J., & Söderqvist, T. (2014). Stakeholder
views 2; deliverable D2.3, MERMAID project.
Röckmann, C., Stuiver, M., van den Burg, S., Zanuttigh, B., Zagonari, F., Airoldi, L., Angelelli, E.,
Suffredini, R., Franceschi, G., Bellotti, G., Schouten, J.J., Söderqvist, T., Garção, R., Guanche
Garcia, R., Sarmiento Martínez, J., Svenstrup Petersen, O., & Aarup Ahrensberg, N. (2015).
Platform solutions; deliverable 2.4, MERMAID project.
Simonsen, J., & Robertson, T. (2012). Routledge international handbook of participatory design.
New York: Routledge.
Stuiver, M., Agricola, H. J., Fontein, R. J., Gerritsen, A. L., Kersten, P. H., & Kselik,
R. A. L. (2012). Multifunctionele Platforms op Zee, het concept, de wet en regelgeving en de
lessen voor de toekomst. Wageningen: Alterra, (Alterra-rapport 2364).
van den Burg, S. W. K., Stuiver, M., Norman, J., Garcao, R., & Rockmann, C. (2016). Participatory
design of multi-use platforms at sea. Sustainability, 8(2)., 17 p.
Vanclay, F. (2002). Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22,
183–211.
Wenting, C., Ruldoph, D., Haggett, C., Seifert-Dähnn, I., Golmen, L., Daria, J., Quevedo, E., Grito,
J. H., Ying, F., Lu, S. Y., & Mintenbeck, K. (2014). D6.4 A framework for describing the social
impacts with concrete examples that apply for the Canary Island, EU FP7 TROPOS project.
Wenting, C., Koundouri, P., Dávila, O. G.; Souliotis, Y., Haggett, C., Ruldoph, D., Ying, F., Lu,
S. Y., Chi, C.; Lin, J.; Li, S., Mintenbeck, K., Gunder, G. L., Quevedo, E., & Grito, J. H., (2015)
D6.6 A framework for describing the social impact with concrete examples that apply for Green
and Blue Concept in Taiwan- a joint report between EU FP7 TROPOS and EU FP7 MERMAID, EU FP7 TROPOS project.
Wesselink, A., Paavola, J., Fritsch, O., & Renn, O. (2011). Rationales for public participation in
environmental policy and governance: Practitioners’ perspectives. Environmental Plan A, 43,
2688–2704. (07-12-2015).
Wilkinson, C. R., & De Angeli, A. (2014). Applying user centred and participatory design
approaches to commercial product development. Design Studies, 35(6), 614–631.
2 Stakeholder Involvement in Technological Design: Lessons Learned from the. . .
37
Aitken, M., Haggett, C., & Rudolph, D. (2016). Practices and rationales of community engagement
with wind farms: Awareness raising, consultation, empowerment. Planning Theory and Practice, 17(4), 557–576.
Berghöfer, A., Wittmer, H., & Rauschmayer, F. (2008). Stakeholder participation in ecosystembased approaches to fisheries management: A synthesis from European research projects.
Marine Policy, 32, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.09.014. (07-12-2015).
Chen W., Ruldoph, D., Haggett, C., Seifert-Dähnn, I., Golmen, L., Daria, J., Quevedo, E., Grito,
J. H., Ying, F., Lu, S. Y., & Mintenbeck, K. (2014). D6.4 A framework for describing the social
impacts with concrete examples that apply for the Canary Island, EU FP7 TROPOS project.
Haggett, C. (2011). Planning and persuasion: Public engagement in renewable energy decisionmaking. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable energy and the public: From NIMBY to
participation (pp. 15–27). Earthscan: London.
Hall, N., Ashworth, P., & Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Social acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of
four common themes across Australian case studies. Energy Policy, 58, 200–208.
Murgue, C., Therond, O., & Leenhardt, D. (2015). Toward integrated water and agricultural land
management: Participatory design of agricultural landscapes. Land Use Policy, 45, 52–63.
Pilemalm, S., & Timpka, T. (2008). Third generation participatory design in health informatics—
Making user participation applicable to large-scale information system projects. Journal of
Biomedical Informatics, 41(2), 327–339.
Pomeroy, R., & Douvere, F. (2008). The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning
process. Marine Policy, 32, 816–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017. (07-122015).
Rasenberg, M., Stuiver, M., Van den Burg, S., Veenstra, F., Norrman, J., & Söderqvist, T. (2013).
Stakeholder views; deliverable D2.2, MERMAID project.
Rasenberg, M., Stuiver, M., Van den Burg, S., Norrman, J., & Söderqvist, T. (2014). Stakeholder
views 2; deliverable D2.3, MERMAID project.
Röckmann, C., Stuiver, M., van den Burg, S., Zanuttigh, B., Zagonari, F., Airoldi, L., Angelelli, E.,
Suffredini, R., Franceschi, G., Bellotti, G., Schouten, J.J., Söderqvist, T., Garção, R., Guanche
Garcia, R., Sarmiento Martínez, J., Svenstrup Petersen, O., & Aarup Ahrensberg, N. (2015).
Platform solutions; deliverable 2.4, MERMAID project.
Simonsen, J., & Robertson, T. (2012). Routledge international handbook of participatory design.
New York: Routledge.
Stuiver, M., Agricola, H. J., Fontein, R. J., Gerritsen, A. L., Kersten, P. H., & Kselik,
R. A. L. (2012). Multifunctionele Platforms op Zee, het concept, de wet en regelgeving en de
lessen voor de toekomst. Wageningen: Alterra, (Alterra-rapport 2364).
van den Burg, S. W. K., Stuiver, M., Norman, J., Garcao, R., & Rockmann, C. (2016). Participatory
design of multi-use platforms at sea. Sustainability, 8(2)., 17 p.
Vanclay, F. (2002). Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22,
183–211.
Wenting, C., Ruldoph, D., Haggett, C., Seifert-Dähnn, I., Golmen, L., Daria, J., Quevedo, E., Grito,
J. H., Ying, F., Lu, S. Y., & Mintenbeck, K. (2014). D6.4 A framework for describing the social
impacts with concrete examples that apply for the Canary Island, EU FP7 TROPOS project.
Wenting, C., Koundouri, P., Dávila, O. G.; Souliotis, Y., Haggett, C., Ruldoph, D., Ying, F., Lu,
S. Y., Chi, C.; Lin, J.; Li, S., Mintenbeck, K., Gunder, G. L., Quevedo, E., & Grito, J. H., (2015)
D6.6 A framework for describing the social impact with concrete examples that apply for Green
and Blue Concept in Taiwan- a joint report between EU FP7 TROPOS and EU FP7 MERMAID, EU FP7 TROPOS project.
Wesselink, A., Paavola, J., Fritsch, O., & Renn, O. (2011). Rationales for public participation in
environmental policy and governance: Practitioners’ perspectives. Environmental Plan A, 43,
2688–2704. (07-12-2015).
Wilkinson, C. R., & De Angeli, A. (2014). Applying user centred and participatory design
approaches to commercial product development. Design Studies, 35(6), 614–631.
2 Stakeholder Involvement in Technological Design: Lessons Learned from the. . .
37