References
AMARE (Interreg). (2020). AMARe – Actions for marine protected areas. Online Platform. https://
amare.interreg-med.eu
Börger, T., Beaumont, N. J., Pendleton, L., Boyle, K. J., Cooper, P., Fletcher, S., et al. (2014).
Incorporating ecosystem services in marine planning: the role of valuation. Marine Policy, 46,
161–170.
Bryce, R., Irvine, K. N., Church, A., Fish, R., Ranger, S., & Kenter, J. O. (2016). Subjective wellbeing indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services,
21, 258–269.
Chan, K. M. A., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012a). Rethinking ecosystem services to better
address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8–18.
Chan, K. M. A., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee,
R., Gould, R., Halpern, B. S., Hannahs, N., Levine, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R.,
Tam, J., & Woodside, U. (2012b). Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A
framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience, 62, 744–756.
Cheng X., Van Damme S., Li L., Uyttenhove P. (2019). ‘Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services:
A review of methods’, Ecosystem Services, Elsevier 37.
Church, A., Burgess, J., Ravenscroft, N., Bird, W., Blackstock, K., Brady, E., Crang, M., Fish, R.,
Gruffudd, P., Mourato, S., Pretty, J., Tolia-Kelly, D., Turner, K., & Winter, M. (2011). Cultural
services. In UK national ecosystem assessment: technical report. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). United Nations environment programme, 1760 UNTS
79; 31 ILM 818.
Costanza, R., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature,
387(15), 253–260.
Cruz, I., Stahel, A., & Max-Neef, M. (2009). Towards a systemic development approach: Building
on the human-scale development paradigm. Ecological Economics, 68, 2021–2030.
Daily, G. C. (Ed.). (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems.
Washington, DC: Island Press. 392 pp.
Dallimer, M., Irvine, K. N., Skinner, A. M. J., Davies, Z. G., Rouquette, J. R., Maltby, L. L.,
Warren, P. H., Armsworth, P. R., & Gaston, K. J. (2012). Biodiversity and the feel-good factor:
Understanding associations between self-reported human Well-being and species richness.
Bioscience, 62, 47–55.
Defra, U. (2007). An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services. Department for
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). UK: UK.
European Commission. (2018). Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An
analytical framework for mapping and assessment of ecosystem condition in EU, Fifth technical
report
Fish, R., Church, A., & Winter, M. (2016). Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel
framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services, 21, 208–217.
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological
benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3, 390–394.
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2013). Consultation on CICES version 4.3, August–December
2012: Report to the European Environment Agency. Consultation report on the common
international classification of ecosystem services under EEA framework contract no
EEA/IEA/09/003. Nottingham, UK: Centre for Environmental Management, University of
Nottingham.
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. B. (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem
Services (CICES) V5.1 and guidance on the application of the revised structure.
Irvine, K., Fuller, R., Devine-Wright, P., Payne, S., Tratalos, J., Warren, P., Lomas, K., & Gaston,
K. (2010). Ecological and psychological value of urban green space. In J. Jenks & C. Jones
(Eds.), Dimensions of the sustainable city. Dordrecht: Springer.
8 Monetary and Non-monetary Valuation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Marine. . .
133
AMARE (Interreg). (2020). AMARe – Actions for marine protected areas. Online Platform. https://
amare.interreg-med.eu
Börger, T., Beaumont, N. J., Pendleton, L., Boyle, K. J., Cooper, P., Fletcher, S., et al. (2014).
Incorporating ecosystem services in marine planning: the role of valuation. Marine Policy, 46,
161–170.
Bryce, R., Irvine, K. N., Church, A., Fish, R., Ranger, S., & Kenter, J. O. (2016). Subjective wellbeing indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services,
21, 258–269.
Chan, K. M. A., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012a). Rethinking ecosystem services to better
address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8–18.
Chan, K. M. A., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee,
R., Gould, R., Halpern, B. S., Hannahs, N., Levine, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R.,
Tam, J., & Woodside, U. (2012b). Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A
framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience, 62, 744–756.
Cheng X., Van Damme S., Li L., Uyttenhove P. (2019). ‘Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services:
A review of methods’, Ecosystem Services, Elsevier 37.
Church, A., Burgess, J., Ravenscroft, N., Bird, W., Blackstock, K., Brady, E., Crang, M., Fish, R.,
Gruffudd, P., Mourato, S., Pretty, J., Tolia-Kelly, D., Turner, K., & Winter, M. (2011). Cultural
services. In UK national ecosystem assessment: technical report. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). United Nations environment programme, 1760 UNTS
79; 31 ILM 818.
Costanza, R., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature,
387(15), 253–260.
Cruz, I., Stahel, A., & Max-Neef, M. (2009). Towards a systemic development approach: Building
on the human-scale development paradigm. Ecological Economics, 68, 2021–2030.
Daily, G. C. (Ed.). (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems.
Washington, DC: Island Press. 392 pp.
Dallimer, M., Irvine, K. N., Skinner, A. M. J., Davies, Z. G., Rouquette, J. R., Maltby, L. L.,
Warren, P. H., Armsworth, P. R., & Gaston, K. J. (2012). Biodiversity and the feel-good factor:
Understanding associations between self-reported human Well-being and species richness.
Bioscience, 62, 47–55.
Defra, U. (2007). An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services. Department for
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). UK: UK.
European Commission. (2018). Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An
analytical framework for mapping and assessment of ecosystem condition in EU, Fifth technical
report
Fish, R., Church, A., & Winter, M. (2016). Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel
framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services, 21, 208–217.
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological
benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3, 390–394.
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2013). Consultation on CICES version 4.3, August–December
2012: Report to the European Environment Agency. Consultation report on the common
international classification of ecosystem services under EEA framework contract no
EEA/IEA/09/003. Nottingham, UK: Centre for Environmental Management, University of
Nottingham.
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. B. (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem
Services (CICES) V5.1 and guidance on the application of the revised structure.
Irvine, K., Fuller, R., Devine-Wright, P., Payne, S., Tratalos, J., Warren, P., Lomas, K., & Gaston,
K. (2010). Ecological and psychological value of urban green space. In J. Jenks & C. Jones
(Eds.), Dimensions of the sustainable city. Dordrecht: Springer.
8 Monetary and Non-monetary Valuation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Marine. . .
133