University Press. https://books.google.com.sa/books?hl=en&lr=
&id=Uo9FBgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=Bell,+J.+(1993).
+Doing+your+research+project:+A+guide+to+first-time
+researchers+in+education+&ots=i_7zZ_ayDA&sig=
Zz1TaqSUU4ahwoUNEQo1yqGUeEQ&redir_esc=y#v=
onepage&q=Bell%2CJ.(1993).Doingyourresearchproject%
3AAguidetofirst-timeresearchersineducation&f=false.
Bell, J. (1999). Doing Your Research Project. A guide for first time
researchers in education and social sciences. Open University Press.
Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. Unwin
Hyman.
Burell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and
organisational analysis. Heinemann.
Burns A. C. & Bush R. F. (1998). Marketing research (2nd ed.).
Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied business
research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. New York: Wiley.
Chen, W., & Hirschheim, R. (2004). A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to
2001. Information Systems Journal, 14(3), 197–235. https://doi.org/
10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00173.x.
Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (1997). Business research: A practical guide
forundergraduate and postgraduate students. Palgrave Macmillan.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and
mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and
mixed methods approach (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Creswell, J.W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C.
(2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health
sciences. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health 10.
De Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in social research. Routledge Taylor &
Francis Group, London & Newyork.
De Vaus, D. A. (2014). Surveys in social research (6th ed.). Routledge.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of
qualitative research. Sage.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design
method. New York: Wiley.
Fishman, D. B. (1991). An introduction to the experimental versus the
pragmatic paradigm in evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14(4), 353–363.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A
simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Guba, E. (1990). The paradigm dialogue. Sage Publications.
Henderson, M. E., Morris, L. L., Carol, T., & Fitz-Gibbon. (1987).
How to measure attitudes.
Hussey, J., & Hussey, R. (1997). Business research: A practical guide
for undergraduate and postgraduate students. Palgrave Macmillan.
Im, Il Hong, & Seongtae Kang, M. S. (2011). An international
comparison of technology adoption Testing the UTAUT model.
Information & Management, 48(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
im.2010.09.001.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research:
A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational
Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Kiljander, H. (2004). Evolution and usability of mobile phone
interaction styles. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology.
Knudsen, C. (2002). Pluralism, scientific progress and the structure of
organization studies. Handelshøjskolen i København: Institut for
Industriøkonomi og Virksomhedsstrategi.
Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research
activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Kumar, R. (2010). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for
beginners (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of
inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific
inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–
749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741.
Nistor, N., Lerche, T., Weinberger, A., Ceobanu, C., & Heymann, O.
(2014). Towards the integration of culture into the unified theory of
acceptance and use of technology. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 45(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.
2012.01383.x.
Pansiri, J. (2005). Pragmatism : A methodological approach to
researching strategic alliances in tourism. 2(3), 191–206.
Parvaiz, G. S., Mufti, O., & Wahab, M. (2016). Pragmatism for mixed
method research at higher education level. 8(2), 67–78.
QiYing S., Adams, C. (2010). Consumers’ attitudes toward Mobile
Commerce. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/jesma.2010101601.
Renaud, K., & Biljon, J. V. (2008). Predicting technology acceptance
and adoption by the elderly : A qualitative study. ACM.
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social
scientists and practitioner-researchers (2nd ed.). Blackwell
Publishing.
Sarantakos, S. (2012). Social research. Palgrave Macmillan.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for
business students (5th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for
business students. Harlow: Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.
1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Schutte, N., Toppinnen, S., Kalimo, R., & Schaufeli, W. (2000). The
factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey
across occupational groups and nations. Journal of Occupational
and Organizational Psychology, 73, 53–66.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A
skill building approach. New York: Wiley.
Sharma, U. (2009). Qualitative research in business and management.
Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 6(4), 292–
296.
Sills, S. J., & Song, C. (2002). Innovations in survey research an
application of web-based surveys. Social Science Computer Review,
20(1), 22–30.
Smith, G. G., Passmore, D., & Faught, T. (2009). The challenges of
online nursing education. The Internet and Higher Education, 12
(2), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.007.
Srivastava, T. N. (2010). Business research methodology. Tata
McGraw Hill Education.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology
usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research,
6(4), 144–176.
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criterio for
reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32- item checklist for
interviews and focus group. International Journal of Qualitative in
Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/
mzm042.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003).
User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.
27(3), 425–478.
Venkatesh, V, Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and
user of information technology: Extending the unified theory of
acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
http://ezproxy.library.capella.edu/login?;
http://search.ebscohost.
com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=iih&AN=71154941&site=ehostlive&scope=site.
Yates, L. (2004). What does good education research look like? Open
University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3
rd ed.).
Sage Publications.
References
57
&id=Uo9FBgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=Bell,+J.+(1993).
+Doing+your+research+project:+A+guide+to+first-time
+researchers+in+education+&ots=i_7zZ_ayDA&sig=
Zz1TaqSUU4ahwoUNEQo1yqGUeEQ&redir_esc=y#v=
onepage&q=Bell%2CJ.(1993).Doingyourresearchproject%
3AAguidetofirst-timeresearchersineducation&f=false.
Bell, J. (1999). Doing Your Research Project. A guide for first time
researchers in education and social sciences. Open University Press.
Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. Unwin
Hyman.
Burell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and
organisational analysis. Heinemann.
Burns A. C. & Bush R. F. (1998). Marketing research (2nd ed.).
Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied business
research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. New York: Wiley.
Chen, W., & Hirschheim, R. (2004). A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to
2001. Information Systems Journal, 14(3), 197–235. https://doi.org/
10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00173.x.
Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (1997). Business research: A practical guide
forundergraduate and postgraduate students. Palgrave Macmillan.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and
mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and
mixed methods approach (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Creswell, J.W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C.
(2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health
sciences. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health 10.
De Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in social research. Routledge Taylor &
Francis Group, London & Newyork.
De Vaus, D. A. (2014). Surveys in social research (6th ed.). Routledge.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of
qualitative research. Sage.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design
method. New York: Wiley.
Fishman, D. B. (1991). An introduction to the experimental versus the
pragmatic paradigm in evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14(4), 353–363.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A
simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Guba, E. (1990). The paradigm dialogue. Sage Publications.
Henderson, M. E., Morris, L. L., Carol, T., & Fitz-Gibbon. (1987).
How to measure attitudes.
Hussey, J., & Hussey, R. (1997). Business research: A practical guide
for undergraduate and postgraduate students. Palgrave Macmillan.
Im, Il Hong, & Seongtae Kang, M. S. (2011). An international
comparison of technology adoption Testing the UTAUT model.
Information & Management, 48(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
im.2010.09.001.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research:
A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational
Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Kiljander, H. (2004). Evolution and usability of mobile phone
interaction styles. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology.
Knudsen, C. (2002). Pluralism, scientific progress and the structure of
organization studies. Handelshøjskolen i København: Institut for
Industriøkonomi og Virksomhedsstrategi.
Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research
activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Kumar, R. (2010). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for
beginners (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of
inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific
inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–
749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741.
Nistor, N., Lerche, T., Weinberger, A., Ceobanu, C., & Heymann, O.
(2014). Towards the integration of culture into the unified theory of
acceptance and use of technology. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 45(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.
2012.01383.x.
Pansiri, J. (2005). Pragmatism : A methodological approach to
researching strategic alliances in tourism. 2(3), 191–206.
Parvaiz, G. S., Mufti, O., & Wahab, M. (2016). Pragmatism for mixed
method research at higher education level. 8(2), 67–78.
QiYing S., Adams, C. (2010). Consumers’ attitudes toward Mobile
Commerce. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/jesma.2010101601.
Renaud, K., & Biljon, J. V. (2008). Predicting technology acceptance
and adoption by the elderly : A qualitative study. ACM.
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social
scientists and practitioner-researchers (2nd ed.). Blackwell
Publishing.
Sarantakos, S. (2012). Social research. Palgrave Macmillan.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for
business students (5th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for
business students. Harlow: Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.
1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Schutte, N., Toppinnen, S., Kalimo, R., & Schaufeli, W. (2000). The
factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey
across occupational groups and nations. Journal of Occupational
and Organizational Psychology, 73, 53–66.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A
skill building approach. New York: Wiley.
Sharma, U. (2009). Qualitative research in business and management.
Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 6(4), 292–
296.
Sills, S. J., & Song, C. (2002). Innovations in survey research an
application of web-based surveys. Social Science Computer Review,
20(1), 22–30.
Smith, G. G., Passmore, D., & Faught, T. (2009). The challenges of
online nursing education. The Internet and Higher Education, 12
(2), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.007.
Srivastava, T. N. (2010). Business research methodology. Tata
McGraw Hill Education.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology
usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research,
6(4), 144–176.
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criterio for
reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32- item checklist for
interviews and focus group. International Journal of Qualitative in
Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/
mzm042.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003).
User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.
27(3), 425–478.
Venkatesh, V, Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and
user of information technology: Extending the unified theory of
acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
http://ezproxy.library.capella.edu/login?;
http://search.ebscohost.
com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=iih&AN=71154941&site=ehostlive&scope=site.
Yates, L. (2004). What does good education research look like? Open
University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3
rd ed.).
Sage Publications.
References
57