List of Tables
Table 1.1
Weight of UAVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
Table 1.2
Range and endurance of UAVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
Table 1.3
Maximum altitude of UAVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
Table 1.4
The amount of respondents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
Table 1.5
ScanEagle specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
Table 2.1
Reliability Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
Table 2.2
First-Round Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
Table 2.3
Second-Round Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18
Table 2.4
Pearson Correlation Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19
Table 3.1
Reliability Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27
Table 3.2
First-Round Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27
Table 3.3
Second-Round Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28
Table 3.4
Pearson Correlation Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28
Table 4.1
Summary of various layer composite fiberglass
fabricated by hand lay-up method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
33
Table 4.2
Design layer of hybrid fiberglass composite embedded
with aluminum phosphate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
34
Table 4.3
Mechanical properties of hybrid fiberglass composite
embedded with aluminum phosphate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37
Table 4.4
Vertical burning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
39
Table 5.1
Definition of oil spill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
42
Table 5.2
List of population, sample, and respondents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
44
Table 5.3
The respondents’ background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
45
Table 5.4
Summary of Cronbach’s Alpha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46
Table 5.5
Cronbach’s alpha interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46
Table 5.6
Descriptive statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47
Table 5.7
Summary of Reliability Statistic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47
Table 5.8
Summary of the normality test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47
Table 5.9
The correlation between equipment and response . . . . . . . . . .
49
Table 5.10
The correlation between training and response . . . . . . . . . . . .
50
Table 5.11
The correlation between management practices
and response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
50
xxix