xxvi
List of Figures
Fig. 19.2
Sketching of hydropower unit placed before pump
experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
Fig. 19.3
Sketching of hydropower unit placed after pump
experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
Fig. 19.4
Height vs Number of blades at 1/4
diameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
Fig. 19.5
Height vs Number of blades at 3/4
diameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
Fig. 19.6
Diameter of pipe vs Power of after pump at 24 blade . . . . . . . . 218
Fig. 19.7
Position of pump vs power of pump at 3/4
diameter
and 16 number of blades . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
Fig. 19.8
Power of pump vs number of blades at after pump
and 1/4
diameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
Fig. 19.9
Power of pump vs position of pump at 1/4
diameter
and 24 blades . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
Fig. 19.10 Situation of experiment vs Number of blades at 1/4
diameter and 10 W pump . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
Fig. 20.1
Binders vs days with one layered thickness of paint
while facing sun at 0.5 m depth underwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
Fig. 20.2
Binders vs days with 0.5 m depth underwater while facing
sun with three layered thickness of paint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
Fig. 20.3
Binders vs days at 0.5 m depth underwater with two
layered thickness of paint with sun-orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
Fig. 22.1
Non-stepped FSW setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259
Fig. 22.2
Tensile strength of FSWed specimens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260
Fig. 23.1
The number of flipping process for SSL algorithm
and ISSL algorithm with DR triangulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
Fig. 23.2
The percentage quality of triangle for SSL algorithm
and ISSL algorithm with DR triangulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
Fig. 24.1
FSW process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272
Fig. 24.2
MILKO 37 universal milling machine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273
Fig. 24.3
FSW experiment setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274
Fig. 24.4
FSW tool—threaded pin and flat shoulder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274
Fig. 25.1
Schematic illustration of FSW process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280
Fig. 25.2
Schematic illustration of tool design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
Fig. 25.3
Universal milling machine MILKO 37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
Fig. 25.4
Experimental setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282
Fig. 25.5
Comparison on the surface appearance of weld zone
on different rotational and transverse speeds a. 490 rpm
and 16 mm/min b. 910 rpm and 16 mm/min c. 1700 rpm
and 16 mm/min d. 1700 rpm and 26 mm/min e. 1700 rpm
and 44 mm/min . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
Fig. 25.6
The cross sections on different rotational and transverse
speeds a. 490 rpm and 16 mm/min b. 910 rpm and 16
mm/min c. 1700 rpm and16 mm/min d. 1700 rpm and 26
mm/min e. 1700 rpm and 44 mm/min . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
Fig. 26.1
Ply layer arrangement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
List of Figures
Fig. 19.2
Sketching of hydropower unit placed before pump
experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
Fig. 19.3
Sketching of hydropower unit placed after pump
experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
Fig. 19.4
Height vs Number of blades at 1/4
diameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
Fig. 19.5
Height vs Number of blades at 3/4
diameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
Fig. 19.6
Diameter of pipe vs Power of after pump at 24 blade . . . . . . . . 218
Fig. 19.7
Position of pump vs power of pump at 3/4
diameter
and 16 number of blades . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
Fig. 19.8
Power of pump vs number of blades at after pump
and 1/4
diameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
Fig. 19.9
Power of pump vs position of pump at 1/4
diameter
and 24 blades . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
Fig. 19.10 Situation of experiment vs Number of blades at 1/4
diameter and 10 W pump . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
Fig. 20.1
Binders vs days with one layered thickness of paint
while facing sun at 0.5 m depth underwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
Fig. 20.2
Binders vs days with 0.5 m depth underwater while facing
sun with three layered thickness of paint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
Fig. 20.3
Binders vs days at 0.5 m depth underwater with two
layered thickness of paint with sun-orientation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
Fig. 22.1
Non-stepped FSW setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259
Fig. 22.2
Tensile strength of FSWed specimens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260
Fig. 23.1
The number of flipping process for SSL algorithm
and ISSL algorithm with DR triangulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
Fig. 23.2
The percentage quality of triangle for SSL algorithm
and ISSL algorithm with DR triangulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
Fig. 24.1
FSW process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272
Fig. 24.2
MILKO 37 universal milling machine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273
Fig. 24.3
FSW experiment setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274
Fig. 24.4
FSW tool—threaded pin and flat shoulder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274
Fig. 25.1
Schematic illustration of FSW process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280
Fig. 25.2
Schematic illustration of tool design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
Fig. 25.3
Universal milling machine MILKO 37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
Fig. 25.4
Experimental setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282
Fig. 25.5
Comparison on the surface appearance of weld zone
on different rotational and transverse speeds a. 490 rpm
and 16 mm/min b. 910 rpm and 16 mm/min c. 1700 rpm
and 16 mm/min d. 1700 rpm and 26 mm/min e. 1700 rpm
and 44 mm/min . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
Fig. 25.6
The cross sections on different rotational and transverse
speeds a. 490 rpm and 16 mm/min b. 910 rpm and 16
mm/min c. 1700 rpm and16 mm/min d. 1700 rpm and 26
mm/min e. 1700 rpm and 44 mm/min . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
Fig. 26.1
Ply layer arrangement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289