Cell Arrangement Measurement—A Perfect Usage of Cell …
15
Fig. 2 Exceptional elements versus cell formation algorithms
Fig. 3 Voids versus cell formation algorithms
Fig. 4 Grouping efficiency versus cell formation algorithms
3. Improved grouping efficiency of 91.33% when comparing with other two
algorithms is shown in Fig. 4.
4. Increased grouping efficacy of 82.14% when compared with other ROC-2 and
DCA algorithms is shown in Fig. 5.
15
Fig. 2 Exceptional elements versus cell formation algorithms
Fig. 3 Voids versus cell formation algorithms
Fig. 4 Grouping efficiency versus cell formation algorithms
3. Improved grouping efficiency of 91.33% when comparing with other two
algorithms is shown in Fig. 4.
4. Increased grouping efficacy of 82.14% when compared with other ROC-2 and
DCA algorithms is shown in Fig. 5.