50
Z. Amini et al.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 3.4 Contrast enhancement results in a sample Topcon image. a original image, b proposed
method, c transform histogram shaping method, d CLAHE method. The second row shows an
enlargement of the specified region of first row images [49]
Table 3.4 Evaluation measure results; averaged over 130 OCT B-scans from the Topcon device
[49]
Method
Measure
CNR
EP
EME
Original
5.4880
1.0000
2.3250
Proposed method
13.4171
0.9037
5.4956
Transform hist.
shaping
11.6249
0.8875
1.3270
CLAHE
4.5240
0.9626
4.0596
Table 3.5 Evaluation measure results; averaged over 60 OCT B-scans from the Zeiss device [49]
Method
Measure
CNR
EP
EME
Original
6.0480
1.0000
13.8075
Proposed method
14.7005
0.9235
15.9087
Transform hist.
shaping
12.4268
0.8930
0.4188
CLAHE
5.6013
0.9990
9.4917
Z. Amini et al.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 3.4 Contrast enhancement results in a sample Topcon image. a original image, b proposed
method, c transform histogram shaping method, d CLAHE method. The second row shows an
enlargement of the specified region of first row images [49]
Table 3.4 Evaluation measure results; averaged over 130 OCT B-scans from the Topcon device
[49]
Method
Measure
CNR
EP
EME
Original
5.4880
1.0000
2.3250
Proposed method
13.4171
0.9037
5.4956
Transform hist.
shaping
11.6249
0.8875
1.3270
CLAHE
4.5240
0.9626
4.0596
Table 3.5 Evaluation measure results; averaged over 60 OCT B-scans from the Zeiss device [49]
Method
Measure
CNR
EP
EME
Original
6.0480
1.0000
13.8075
Proposed method
14.7005
0.9235
15.9087
Transform hist.
shaping
12.4268
0.8930
0.4188
CLAHE
5.6013
0.9990
9.4917
