meaning, explicit and implicit, those are the characteristics that represent the dynamic balance.
This study confirms Cornelis van de Ven’s articulation about Tao space theory (Ven 1995), that
intervention between two opposing characteristics is the essential structure of temporary space
aesthetic. The same goes for Deleuze and Guattari’s viewpoint (Deleuze & Guattari, 1994) that
limitation is an illusion and determination is a negation unless if there is a relation between the
determined and the one that is not; hybridity between physical and digital space.
REFERENCES
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1994. What is Philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
Hidayat, J. 2005. Bahasa Estetik Skizofrenia dalam Ruang Heterotopia: Studi Kasus Area Natah dalam Sintaks
Tradisional Bali. Jurnal 2d3d. Tangerang, Banten: Fakultas Desain, Universitas Pelita Harapan.
Mirzoeff, N. 1998. Michel Foucault of other Spaces. New York: Routledge.
Piliang, Y.A. 1999. Hiper-realitas Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Piliang, Y.A. 2004. Posrealitas: Realitas Kebudayaan dalam Era Posmetafisika. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
Sajjad, N.u.A. 2019. Private Heterotopia and the Public Space: An Incongruity Explored through Orhan
Pamuk’s My Name is Red. Sage Open Journal 9(1). New York: Sage Publishing.
Ven, C.v.d. 1995. Ruang dalam Arsitektur (3rd Edition). Jakarta: Gramedia.
Wollan, G. 2003. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Space and Place. Journal Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian
Journal of Geography 57(1): 31-39. Taylor & Francis.
Yin, R.K. 2014. Case Study Research Design and Methods (5 Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
253
This study confirms Cornelis van de Ven’s articulation about Tao space theory (Ven 1995), that
intervention between two opposing characteristics is the essential structure of temporary space
aesthetic. The same goes for Deleuze and Guattari’s viewpoint (Deleuze & Guattari, 1994) that
limitation is an illusion and determination is a negation unless if there is a relation between the
determined and the one that is not; hybridity between physical and digital space.
REFERENCES
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1994. What is Philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
Hidayat, J. 2005. Bahasa Estetik Skizofrenia dalam Ruang Heterotopia: Studi Kasus Area Natah dalam Sintaks
Tradisional Bali. Jurnal 2d3d. Tangerang, Banten: Fakultas Desain, Universitas Pelita Harapan.
Mirzoeff, N. 1998. Michel Foucault of other Spaces. New York: Routledge.
Piliang, Y.A. 1999. Hiper-realitas Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Piliang, Y.A. 2004. Posrealitas: Realitas Kebudayaan dalam Era Posmetafisika. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
Sajjad, N.u.A. 2019. Private Heterotopia and the Public Space: An Incongruity Explored through Orhan
Pamuk’s My Name is Red. Sage Open Journal 9(1). New York: Sage Publishing.
Ven, C.v.d. 1995. Ruang dalam Arsitektur (3rd Edition). Jakarta: Gramedia.
Wollan, G. 2003. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Space and Place. Journal Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian
Journal of Geography 57(1): 31-39. Taylor & Francis.
Yin, R.K. 2014. Case Study Research Design and Methods (5 Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
253