285
7 CONCLUSION
We have implemented a solution for a complex task in the field of design automation of open
pit large-scale blasts and the simulation of their results. A software tool for modeling the
results of open pit large-scale blasts was developed. The tool allows to predict the results of
the project implementation at the design stage, namely:
• geometry of surfaces of break line and shotpile;
• volume of broken rock and mineral content;
• spatial distribution of content in the shotpile;
• losses and dilution of minerals.
Verification of the large-scale blast simulation tool based on a comparison of the results of
actual blasts and simulation has shown that they correspond well to each other.
REFERENCES
[1] Tatarchuk S. Yu. Experience in the implementation and operation of BLAST MAKER software//
Mining Journal of Kazakhstan. 2013 11. Pp. 33–36.
[2] Kabelko S.G. Computer modelling of the shotpile an explosive unit and the distribution of the
mineral content in the blasted rock mass//Scientific news. 2010, No. 13 (840, Issue 15/1, pp. 84–92.
[3] Volkov Yu. I., Seriy S.S., Dunaev V.A., Gerasimov A.V. GIS GEOMIX for mining industry in Russia and Kazakhstan//Gornyi Zhurnal, 2015(5), 8–13, May 2015.
[4] Lukichev S.V., Nagovitsyn O.V. Automated solution of mining by MINEFRAME software//Mining equipment – 2014, – No. 2., St. Petersburg – pp. 38–42.
[5] Lukichev S., Nagovitsyn O. A system approach to solving the mining technology tasks based on
modeling its objects and processes//Proceeding of 38th international symposium APCOM. 2017.
August 9–11. P. 5-25-5-29.
[6] Lukichev S.V., Nagovitsyn O.V., Kornienko A.V. Automated design of open pit large-scale blasts in
MINEFRAME software//Notes of Mining Institute: “Physical problems of rock destruction”. –
SPb., T. 171, No. 1. – 2007. – pp. 216–222.
[7] Kornienko A.V., Gurin K.P. Automated design of large-scale blasts in open and underground
mining//Proceedings of the 12th international symposium “Development of mineral deposits and
underground construction in difficult hydrogeological conditions” “Issues of drainage, geology
and geo-informatics, geomechanics, special mining and mining technologies”, Belgorod, May
20–24, 2013. pp. 284–295.
[8] Lukichev S.V., Kozyrev S.A. Numerical modeling of the process of dynamic deformation and
destruction of rock massif when blasting a single charge or a group of charges//Proceedings of the
international scientific conference “Physical problems of explosive destruction of rock massifs”. –
M .: IPKON RAS, 1999. – pp. 164–168.
[9] Lukichev S.V., Shishkin A.S., Kornienko A.V. Simulation of the process of destruction of rock
massif and the formation of break line boundary in a large-scale blast of borehole charges//Mining
information and analytical bulletin (scientific and technical journal). 2017. No. S23. Pp. 194–202.
[10] Lukichev S.V., Dyakov A.Yu., Shishkin A.S. Geoinformational methods for analysing the results
of geodesic and geophysical studies in assessing the results of open pit large-scale blasts // Problems
of Subsoil Use. 2016. 3 (10). Pp. 89–95.
7 CONCLUSION
We have implemented a solution for a complex task in the field of design automation of open
pit large-scale blasts and the simulation of their results. A software tool for modeling the
results of open pit large-scale blasts was developed. The tool allows to predict the results of
the project implementation at the design stage, namely:
• geometry of surfaces of break line and shotpile;
• volume of broken rock and mineral content;
• spatial distribution of content in the shotpile;
• losses and dilution of minerals.
Verification of the large-scale blast simulation tool based on a comparison of the results of
actual blasts and simulation has shown that they correspond well to each other.
REFERENCES
[1] Tatarchuk S. Yu. Experience in the implementation and operation of BLAST MAKER software//
Mining Journal of Kazakhstan. 2013 11. Pp. 33–36.
[2] Kabelko S.G. Computer modelling of the shotpile an explosive unit and the distribution of the
mineral content in the blasted rock mass//Scientific news. 2010, No. 13 (840, Issue 15/1, pp. 84–92.
[3] Volkov Yu. I., Seriy S.S., Dunaev V.A., Gerasimov A.V. GIS GEOMIX for mining industry in Russia and Kazakhstan//Gornyi Zhurnal, 2015(5), 8–13, May 2015.
[4] Lukichev S.V., Nagovitsyn O.V. Automated solution of mining by MINEFRAME software//Mining equipment – 2014, – No. 2., St. Petersburg – pp. 38–42.
[5] Lukichev S., Nagovitsyn O. A system approach to solving the mining technology tasks based on
modeling its objects and processes//Proceeding of 38th international symposium APCOM. 2017.
August 9–11. P. 5-25-5-29.
[6] Lukichev S.V., Nagovitsyn O.V., Kornienko A.V. Automated design of open pit large-scale blasts in
MINEFRAME software//Notes of Mining Institute: “Physical problems of rock destruction”. –
SPb., T. 171, No. 1. – 2007. – pp. 216–222.
[7] Kornienko A.V., Gurin K.P. Automated design of large-scale blasts in open and underground
mining//Proceedings of the 12th international symposium “Development of mineral deposits and
underground construction in difficult hydrogeological conditions” “Issues of drainage, geology
and geo-informatics, geomechanics, special mining and mining technologies”, Belgorod, May
20–24, 2013. pp. 284–295.
[8] Lukichev S.V., Kozyrev S.A. Numerical modeling of the process of dynamic deformation and
destruction of rock massif when blasting a single charge or a group of charges//Proceedings of the
international scientific conference “Physical problems of explosive destruction of rock massifs”. –
M .: IPKON RAS, 1999. – pp. 164–168.
[9] Lukichev S.V., Shishkin A.S., Kornienko A.V. Simulation of the process of destruction of rock
massif and the formation of break line boundary in a large-scale blast of borehole charges//Mining
information and analytical bulletin (scientific and technical journal). 2017. No. S23. Pp. 194–202.
[10] Lukichev S.V., Dyakov A.Yu., Shishkin A.S. Geoinformational methods for analysing the results
of geodesic and geophysical studies in assessing the results of open pit large-scale blasts // Problems
of Subsoil Use. 2016. 3 (10). Pp. 89–95.