ascertain the Grand Master’s inner thoughts about the cornerstones of physics.
While Einstein did say that ‘time is an illusion’, Prigogine on the other hand
asserted that ‘we are the children of time’. As the prospective reader of this contribution might have realized, energy-momentum and space-time are inevitably
coupled to each other as conjugate entities and that the present formulation, as a
consequence, invokes the characteristics of the Correlated Dissipative Ensemble,
CDE.
In previous studies we have emphasized the opportunity of cell recognition
suggested by the possibilities offered by the cellular Q-value prearranged by the
CDS as building blocks in every cell. This problem involves both inter- and
intra-cell communication. The lower- as well as the higher-level structures are
subject to Poisson statistics defining physical communication channels between and
within them. In particular we have focused on the CNS, the central nervous system,
in the presence of a special type of cells, i.e. neurons, with the dynamics characterized by short time scale oscillations, building up pulses of light carriers (electrons), i.e. spikes that correlate the basic dissipative systems e.g. cells/neurons, see
also footnote 21, and providing an irreducible coupling that arrange for the communication between them. For more details regarding the usage of stochastic
backgrounds as objective physical communication channels, the former commensurate with the Poisson statistics, authorizing a direct call centre analogy, i.e. the
distribution of the rate of incoming phone calls received at each neuron, the
switchboard, see Refs. [9, 11, 25]. Note that the code for exchanging “communication” is given by the transformation B, Eq. (4.13), which applies in both limits:
λ L →
N
2
; n → ∞
and
λ L → 1; λ S → 1; n →
N
2
while not being contained in the actual “phone call”.
Special attention has been given to Arnold Trehub’s celebrated Retinoid Model
for vision [36, 37] constituted by a special type of neurons called the autapse, i.e.
with a chemical synapse linked onto itself. In particular we have utilized the
symmetry
27 of the diagram (5.11), where the columns to the left of the centre are
minus one times the complex conjugate of the ones to the right.
28 By projecting the
neural dynamics onto Trehub’s “3D egocentric space” one realizes a certain
27
It is important to realize that this is not a “biological” symmetry, but induced by the perception of
mirror neuron images produced by the autapse.
28
This is a crucial feature, since according to the Charge, Parity, Time reversal, CPT, theorem,
believed to be the fundamental symmetry of physical laws, see also Ref. [38] the brain perceive
time reversal symmetry as a space parity inversion, which explains the Necker cube illusion [25].
400
E. J. Brändas
While Einstein did say that ‘time is an illusion’, Prigogine on the other hand
asserted that ‘we are the children of time’. As the prospective reader of this contribution might have realized, energy-momentum and space-time are inevitably
coupled to each other as conjugate entities and that the present formulation, as a
consequence, invokes the characteristics of the Correlated Dissipative Ensemble,
CDE.
In previous studies we have emphasized the opportunity of cell recognition
suggested by the possibilities offered by the cellular Q-value prearranged by the
CDS as building blocks in every cell. This problem involves both inter- and
intra-cell communication. The lower- as well as the higher-level structures are
subject to Poisson statistics defining physical communication channels between and
within them. In particular we have focused on the CNS, the central nervous system,
in the presence of a special type of cells, i.e. neurons, with the dynamics characterized by short time scale oscillations, building up pulses of light carriers (electrons), i.e. spikes that correlate the basic dissipative systems e.g. cells/neurons, see
also footnote 21, and providing an irreducible coupling that arrange for the communication between them. For more details regarding the usage of stochastic
backgrounds as objective physical communication channels, the former commensurate with the Poisson statistics, authorizing a direct call centre analogy, i.e. the
distribution of the rate of incoming phone calls received at each neuron, the
switchboard, see Refs. [9, 11, 25]. Note that the code for exchanging “communication” is given by the transformation B, Eq. (4.13), which applies in both limits:
λ L →
N
2
; n → ∞
and
λ L → 1; λ S → 1; n →
N
2
while not being contained in the actual “phone call”.
Special attention has been given to Arnold Trehub’s celebrated Retinoid Model
for vision [36, 37] constituted by a special type of neurons called the autapse, i.e.
with a chemical synapse linked onto itself. In particular we have utilized the
symmetry
27 of the diagram (5.11), where the columns to the left of the centre are
minus one times the complex conjugate of the ones to the right.
28 By projecting the
neural dynamics onto Trehub’s “3D egocentric space” one realizes a certain
27
It is important to realize that this is not a “biological” symmetry, but induced by the perception of
mirror neuron images produced by the autapse.
28
This is a crucial feature, since according to the Charge, Parity, Time reversal, CPT, theorem,
believed to be the fundamental symmetry of physical laws, see also Ref. [38] the brain perceive
time reversal symmetry as a space parity inversion, which explains the Necker cube illusion [25].
400
E. J. Brändas