———, ‘Introduction’, Luhmann on Law and Politics. Critical Appraisals and Applications (Hart Publishing 2006)
Kingsbury B and Straumann B, ‘The State of Nature and Commercial Sociability in
Early Modern International Legal Thought’ (2010) 31 Grotiana 22
Kittler FA, Gramophone, Film, Typewriter (Geoffrey Winthrop-Young and Michael
Wutz trs, Stanford University Press 1999)
Kobayashi I, ‘Private Contracting and Business Models of Electronic Commerce’
(2005) 13 University of Miami Business Law Review 161
Koskenniemi M, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Reissue with a New Epilogue (Cambridge University Press 2005)
Koulu R, Kansainvälinen prosessioikeus pääpiirteittäin (WSOY 2003)
———, Kaupallisten riitojen sovittelu (University of Helsinki Conflict Management
Institute 2006)
Koulu R, Videoneuvottelu rajat ylittävässä oikeudenkäynnissä. sähköisen oikeudenkäynnin nousu. (University of Helsinki Conflict Management Institute 2010)
———, ‘Domstolsrättegångar Och Alternativ Tvistelösning – Innebär Användning Av
Nutida Teknologi I Tvistelösning En Upplösning Av Separata Paradigm?’ (2013)
2013 Retfaerd: Nordisk juridisk tidskrift 60
———, ‘Disintegration of the State Monopoly on Dispute Resolution: How Should
We Perceive State Sovereignty in the ODR Era?’ (2014) 1 International Journal of
Online Dispute Resolution 125
———, ‘Blockchains and Online Dispute Resolution: Smart Contracts as an Alternative
to Enforcement’ (2016) 13 SCRIPTed 40
———, ‘Improving Consumer Protection through Technology: The Challenge of
Compliance’ in Immaculada Barral (ed), La resolución de conflictos con consumidores:
de las ADR a las ODR (Reus 2018)
Koulu S, Lapsen huolto- ja tapaamissopimukset. oikeuden rakenteet ja sopivat perheet
(Lakimiesliiton kustannus 2014)
Kuhn TS, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press 1964)
Kurkela M and Turunen S, Due Process in International Commercial Arbitration (2nd
edn, Oxford University Press 2010)
Landsman S, ‘So What? Possible Implications of the Vanishing Trial Phenomenon’
[2004] Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 973
Larson J and others, ‘How We Analyzed the COMPAS Recidivism Algorithm’ ProPublica (23 May 2016) accessed 27 June 2018
Lastowka G, Virtual Justice: The New Laws of Online Worlds (Yale University Press
2010)
Latour B, Science in Action (Open University Press 1987)
Lederer FI, ‘The Courtroom 21 Project: Creating the Courtroom of the Twenty-First
Century’ (2004) 43 ABA Judges’ Journal 39
———, ‘Technology-Augmented Courtrooms – Progress Amid a Few Complications,
or the Problematic Interrelationship Between Court and Counsel’ (2005) 60 NYU
Annual Survey of American Law 675
———, ‘The Road to the Virtual Courtroom? A Consideration of Today’s - and
Tomorrow’s - High-Technology Courtrooms’ (2009) 50 South Carolina Law
Review 799
———, ‘Wired, What We Have Learned About Courtroom Technology’ (2010) 24
ABA Criminal Justice 18
Bibliography 203
Kingsbury B and Straumann B, ‘The State of Nature and Commercial Sociability in
Early Modern International Legal Thought’ (2010) 31 Grotiana 22
Kittler FA, Gramophone, Film, Typewriter (Geoffrey Winthrop-Young and Michael
Wutz trs, Stanford University Press 1999)
Kobayashi I, ‘Private Contracting and Business Models of Electronic Commerce’
(2005) 13 University of Miami Business Law Review 161
Koskenniemi M, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Reissue with a New Epilogue (Cambridge University Press 2005)
Koulu R, Kansainvälinen prosessioikeus pääpiirteittäin (WSOY 2003)
———, Kaupallisten riitojen sovittelu (University of Helsinki Conflict Management
Institute 2006)
Koulu R, Videoneuvottelu rajat ylittävässä oikeudenkäynnissä. sähköisen oikeudenkäynnin nousu. (University of Helsinki Conflict Management Institute 2010)
———, ‘Domstolsrättegångar Och Alternativ Tvistelösning – Innebär Användning Av
Nutida Teknologi I Tvistelösning En Upplösning Av Separata Paradigm?’ (2013)
2013 Retfaerd: Nordisk juridisk tidskrift 60
———, ‘Disintegration of the State Monopoly on Dispute Resolution: How Should
We Perceive State Sovereignty in the ODR Era?’ (2014) 1 International Journal of
Online Dispute Resolution 125
———, ‘Blockchains and Online Dispute Resolution: Smart Contracts as an Alternative
to Enforcement’ (2016) 13 SCRIPTed 40
———, ‘Improving Consumer Protection through Technology: The Challenge of
Compliance’ in Immaculada Barral (ed), La resolución de conflictos con consumidores:
de las ADR a las ODR (Reus 2018)
Koulu S, Lapsen huolto- ja tapaamissopimukset. oikeuden rakenteet ja sopivat perheet
(Lakimiesliiton kustannus 2014)
Kuhn TS, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press 1964)
Kurkela M and Turunen S, Due Process in International Commercial Arbitration (2nd
edn, Oxford University Press 2010)
Landsman S, ‘So What? Possible Implications of the Vanishing Trial Phenomenon’
[2004] Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 973
Larson J and others, ‘How We Analyzed the COMPAS Recidivism Algorithm’ ProPublica (23 May 2016)
Lastowka G, Virtual Justice: The New Laws of Online Worlds (Yale University Press
2010)
Latour B, Science in Action (Open University Press 1987)
Lederer FI, ‘The Courtroom 21 Project: Creating the Courtroom of the Twenty-First
Century’ (2004) 43 ABA Judges’ Journal 39
———, ‘Technology-Augmented Courtrooms – Progress Amid a Few Complications,
or the Problematic Interrelationship Between Court and Counsel’ (2005) 60 NYU
Annual Survey of American Law 675
———, ‘The Road to the Virtual Courtroom? A Consideration of Today’s - and
Tomorrow’s - High-Technology Courtrooms’ (2009) 50 South Carolina Law
Review 799
———, ‘Wired, What We Have Learned About Courtroom Technology’ (2010) 24
ABA Criminal Justice 18
Bibliography 203