puzzling observed cosmological acceleration, without the need to introduce exotic
forms of matter or unusual concepts like dark energies, anomalous gravitational
interactions and unreasonable cosmological constants. Taking all these points into
consideration, advancing evolution as a teleodynamic processes, our rather simple
zero-energy universe scenario, ZEUS, is fully commensurate with an intrinsic
ontology of entangled physical and mental worlds conjecturing a more basic and
detailed theoretical formulation of Darwin’s Evolution Paradigm.
Note Added in Proof:
Footnote 1: The notion of the Zero-Energy Universe is not new, see e.g. Berman [46].
Footnote 8: For accounts of the rules for the increase of complexity, see Maruani [47].
Acknowledgments The author thanks the organiser of QSCP XVIII, Prof. Marco Chaer Nascimento, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for friendly cooperation, providing an excellent programme and organization. The present research has, over the
years, been supported by the Swedish Natural Science Research Council, the Swedish Foundation
for Strategic Research, The European Commission and the Nobel Foundation.
References
1. Tegmark M (2003) Parallel Universes. Sci Am
2. Greene B (2011) Hidden reality parallel Universes and the deep laws of the Cosmos. Alfred A.
Knopf, New York
3. Green MB, Schwarz JH, Witten E (2012) Superstring theory: volume 2, Loop amplitudes,
anomalies and phenomenology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. Gödel K (1931) Über Formal Unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Matematica und
Verwandter Systeme I. Monatshäfte für Mathematik und Physik 38:173–198
5. Brändas EJ (2011) Gödelian structures and self-organization in biological systems. Int J
Quantum Chem 111:1321
6. Brändas EJ (2012) Examining the limits of physical theory: analytical principles and logical
implications (Adv. Quantum Chem.). In: Nicolaides CA, Brändas EJ (eds) Unstable states in
the continuous spectra, part II: interpretation, theory, and applications, vol 63. Elsevier,
Amsterdam, p 33
7. Brändas EJ (2012) The relativistic Kepler problem and Gödel’s Paradox. In: Nishikawa K,
Maruani J, Brändas EJ, Delgado-Barrio G, Piecuch P (eds) Quantum systems in chemistry and
physics, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht, p 3
8. Kerr RP (1963) Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special
metrics. Phys Rev Lett 11:237
9. Löwdin P-O (1998) Linear algebra for quantum theory. Wiley, New York
10. Feferman S (2009) Gödel, Nagel, minds and machines. J Philos 106(4):201
11. Turing AM (1937) On computational numbers, with an application to the
Entscheidungsproblem. Proc London Math Soc 42(2):230; ibid. 43:544
12. Brändas EJ (2013) Some biochemical reflections on information and communication. In:
Hotokka M, Maruani J, Brändas EJ, Delgado-Barrio G (eds) Quantum systems in chemistry,
physics and biology, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht, p 75
13. Penrose R (1994) Shadows of the mind: a search for the missing science of consciousness.
Oxford University Press, Oxford
282
E.J. Brändas
forms of matter or unusual concepts like dark energies, anomalous gravitational
interactions and unreasonable cosmological constants. Taking all these points into
consideration, advancing evolution as a teleodynamic processes, our rather simple
zero-energy universe scenario, ZEUS, is fully commensurate with an intrinsic
ontology of entangled physical and mental worlds conjecturing a more basic and
detailed theoretical formulation of Darwin’s Evolution Paradigm.
Note Added in Proof:
Footnote 1: The notion of the Zero-Energy Universe is not new, see e.g. Berman [46].
Footnote 8: For accounts of the rules for the increase of complexity, see Maruani [47].
Acknowledgments The author thanks the organiser of QSCP XVIII, Prof. Marco Chaer Nascimento, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for friendly cooperation, providing an excellent programme and organization. The present research has, over the
years, been supported by the Swedish Natural Science Research Council, the Swedish Foundation
for Strategic Research, The European Commission and the Nobel Foundation.
References
1. Tegmark M (2003) Parallel Universes. Sci Am
2. Greene B (2011) Hidden reality parallel Universes and the deep laws of the Cosmos. Alfred A.
Knopf, New York
3. Green MB, Schwarz JH, Witten E (2012) Superstring theory: volume 2, Loop amplitudes,
anomalies and phenomenology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. Gödel K (1931) Über Formal Unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Matematica und
Verwandter Systeme I. Monatshäfte für Mathematik und Physik 38:173–198
5. Brändas EJ (2011) Gödelian structures and self-organization in biological systems. Int J
Quantum Chem 111:1321
6. Brändas EJ (2012) Examining the limits of physical theory: analytical principles and logical
implications (Adv. Quantum Chem.). In: Nicolaides CA, Brändas EJ (eds) Unstable states in
the continuous spectra, part II: interpretation, theory, and applications, vol 63. Elsevier,
Amsterdam, p 33
7. Brändas EJ (2012) The relativistic Kepler problem and Gödel’s Paradox. In: Nishikawa K,
Maruani J, Brändas EJ, Delgado-Barrio G, Piecuch P (eds) Quantum systems in chemistry and
physics, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht, p 3
8. Kerr RP (1963) Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special
metrics. Phys Rev Lett 11:237
9. Löwdin P-O (1998) Linear algebra for quantum theory. Wiley, New York
10. Feferman S (2009) Gödel, Nagel, minds and machines. J Philos 106(4):201
11. Turing AM (1937) On computational numbers, with an application to the
Entscheidungsproblem. Proc London Math Soc 42(2):230; ibid. 43:544
12. Brändas EJ (2013) Some biochemical reflections on information and communication. In:
Hotokka M, Maruani J, Brändas EJ, Delgado-Barrio G (eds) Quantum systems in chemistry,
physics and biology, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht, p 75
13. Penrose R (1994) Shadows of the mind: a search for the missing science of consciousness.
Oxford University Press, Oxford
282
E.J. Brändas