85
Essences of Interaction
or field of work—the framework be adapted and applied appropriately
regardless of the type of product or service that is desired.
From a systems engineering perspective, the processes take a lifecycle perspective that incorporates: conceptualization, planning, design, development, testing, and delivery of the product or service, then continuing with
acceptance, operations, support, maintenance, upgrades, and ending with
disposal. From a systems integration perspective, the process takes on an
event-driven perspective that endeavors to provide stability in operations for
products and services.
Subjective Frame
Social processes form the subjective frame of the framework of objective causalities. The role of the social process for systems engineering is to describe
the cognition and cognitive structures that deal with objects. In the case of
people, the subjective frame deals with thoughts that guide people, inspire
them, support them, provide needed resources, and encourage, cajole, or
compel them. The management of the project for systems engineering is a
social process (Yasui 2010). The set of factors that make up this social thinking process (subjective frame) are consistent with scientific sociological
investigations that divide the factors into planning, procedure (mechanisms),
and models of the plans and procedures (mechanisms). In this sense, procedures are termed as mechanisms. For clarity and to avoid confusion with
dual use of the term mechanism, “mechanism” is used in the engineering
and science sense to describe the inner workings of an object, while “procedures” are used instead of social mechanisms in describe processes.
For natural objects, the results of interaction may be sporadic interaction or
aggregations of a temporary nature or integrations that are metastable or
stable. A natural process has an input (EMMI) that responds according to a
set of rules and is enacted through a set of procedures and activities which
are exemplified by accurate representations of the enactment of the mechanistic rules and the mechanistic procedures and activities. The output of the
process is the performance of the process, activities, or acts.
The result of a set of processes (referred to as the result of a procedure (i.e.,
social mechanism) or procedure) is called an event. One process could be
referred to as an event, a set of processes can be referred to as an event (or set
of events), or an abstraction of processes (or a single process) can be referred
to as an event. An event implies the activation of a mechanism (i.e., physical
mechanism) that is embodied within an object.
Summary of Objective Causalities
The frame of objective causalities is applicable to building cars (when engineers formulate plans, follow procedures, and model expected results), to
delivering cars with requisite physical characteristics, required functions
Essences of Interaction
or field of work—the framework be adapted and applied appropriately
regardless of the type of product or service that is desired.
From a systems engineering perspective, the processes take a lifecycle perspective that incorporates: conceptualization, planning, design, development, testing, and delivery of the product or service, then continuing with
acceptance, operations, support, maintenance, upgrades, and ending with
disposal. From a systems integration perspective, the process takes on an
event-driven perspective that endeavors to provide stability in operations for
products and services.
Subjective Frame
Social processes form the subjective frame of the framework of objective causalities. The role of the social process for systems engineering is to describe
the cognition and cognitive structures that deal with objects. In the case of
people, the subjective frame deals with thoughts that guide people, inspire
them, support them, provide needed resources, and encourage, cajole, or
compel them. The management of the project for systems engineering is a
social process (Yasui 2010). The set of factors that make up this social thinking process (subjective frame) are consistent with scientific sociological
investigations that divide the factors into planning, procedure (mechanisms),
and models of the plans and procedures (mechanisms). In this sense, procedures are termed as mechanisms. For clarity and to avoid confusion with
dual use of the term mechanism, “mechanism” is used in the engineering
and science sense to describe the inner workings of an object, while “procedures” are used instead of social mechanisms in describe processes.
For natural objects, the results of interaction may be sporadic interaction or
aggregations of a temporary nature or integrations that are metastable or
stable. A natural process has an input (EMMI) that responds according to a
set of rules and is enacted through a set of procedures and activities which
are exemplified by accurate representations of the enactment of the mechanistic rules and the mechanistic procedures and activities. The output of the
process is the performance of the process, activities, or acts.
The result of a set of processes (referred to as the result of a procedure (i.e.,
social mechanism) or procedure) is called an event. One process could be
referred to as an event, a set of processes can be referred to as an event (or set
of events), or an abstraction of processes (or a single process) can be referred
to as an event. An event implies the activation of a mechanism (i.e., physical
mechanism) that is embodied within an object.
Summary of Objective Causalities
The frame of objective causalities is applicable to building cars (when engineers formulate plans, follow procedures, and model expected results), to
delivering cars with requisite physical characteristics, required functions