80
2 The Use of Paradigms and Theories in the PULSE 3 …
Framework Convention on Climate Change. Accessed at: https://unfccc.int/about-us/about-thesecretariat. Accessed on: 6 Apr 2020
Urdang S (1989) And still they dance: women, war, and the struggle for change in Mozambique.
Monthly Review Press, New York
Urry J (2005) The complexity turn. Theory, Cult Soc 22(5):1–14
Vasileiadou E, Safarzy´ nska K (2010) Transitions: taking complexity seriously. Futures 42:1176–
1186
Walt SM (1998) International relations: one world many theories. Foreign Policy 110(29–32):34–46
Walt SM (2005) The relationship between theory and policy in international relations. Annu Rev
Polit Sci 8:23–48
Warner JF, Wester P, Hoogesteger J (2014) Struggling with scales: revisiting the boundaries of river
basin management. WIREs Water 1:469–481
Warner J, Waalewijn P, Hilhorst DH (2002) Public participation in disaster-prone watersheds:
time for multi-stakeholder platforms? Wageningen University. Irrigation and Water Management
Group. Disaster Studies
Weber R (2004) The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: a personal view. MIS Q 28(1):iii–
xii
Wendt A (1999) Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wight C (2006) Agents, structures and international relations: politics as ontology. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge
Wildavsky A (1979) Speaking truth to power: the art and craft of policy analysis. Little, Brown and
Company, Boston
Winter G (2000) A comparative discussion of the notion of ‘validity’ in qualitative and quantitative
research. Qual Rep 4(3):1–14
Ye FY (2009) From chaos to unification: U theory vs. M theory. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 42(1):89–93
Zais R (1976) Curriculum: principles and foundations. Thomas Y. Crowell, New York
Zeitoun M (2007) The conflict vs. cooperation paradox: fighting over or sharing of Palestinian-Israeli
groundwater? Water Int 32(1):105–120
Zeitoun M, Warner J (2006) Hydro-hegemony—a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water
conflicts. Water Policy 8:435–460
Zyla B (2019) Eclecticism and the future of the burden-sharing research programme: why trump is
wrong. Int Policy Sci Rev
Précédent

- 94/299

Suivant