showed phytotoxicity which ultimately leads to decreased
root length and biomass (Kim et al. 2011). Authors reported
the toxic effect of ZnO NPs on maize and ryegrass, in which
the inhibition in the germination was observed. In another
experiment, Ma et al. (2010) reported that, when the aluminium oxide and rare element oxide NPs were applied to
the plants, such as carrots, cabbage, cucumber, soybeans and
maize, the toxic effect was demonstrated, as they act as an
inhibitor for elongation of roots.
The field of soil science is related to all materials science,
which are commonly found in soils. These matrices can
provide the nutrition for organisms along with those
microflora and fauna that assist these processes. This is a
composite mixture of chemicals as well as organisms, from
which some are pre-arranged at the nano-level while the
others are unable to do so (Belal and El-Ramady 2016). The
scope of the nanotechnology has been extended from the
early phase of preliminary innovations of capability to progress and situate atoms (Belal and El-Ramady 2016). Soil is
a composite mix of particles homing in size from millimetres
(mm) to nanometres scale (nm). By means of some highly
sophisticated techniques such as transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), it
may perhaps be promising to recognize these soils
makeup. These preceding methods are capable to demonstrate the association of colloid materials in soils like humic
acids and phyllosilicates, and the detection of novel material
like iron oxides NPs. Thus, nanotechnology is able to offer
additional possibility in classifying single cells, proteins,
DNA, genes, as well as other biological structures in soils
(Dasgupta et al. 2016a).
With reference to soil, nanotechnology is of vital significance, since a number of constituents of the soils have
nanoscale features or are nanoparticulate (Mura et al. 2013).
At the nanoscale level, interactions are either conquered by
stronger polar and electrostatic interactions, weak Van der
Waals forces, or covalent bonding. The particulars of interaction forces of nanoparticle-nanoparticle as well as interactions between nanoparticle-fluid are of major significance
for illustrating the chemical and physical processes along
with time-lapse progression of free NPs (Mura et al. 2013).
Also, in soil, different nanomaterials (NMs) can be found
such as nanominerals ranging from nanoparticle to nanosize
NPs of mineral but larger sized particles are also present
(Maurice and Hochella 2008). Sharma et al. (2015) reviewed
the natural inorganic NPs formation, their fate as well as its
toxicity issue (Sharma et al. 2015). Additionally, variable
NPs are also found in soil matrix, bacterial appendages, clay
minerals, amorphous substances as well as other nanominerals (Mura et al. 2013).
Manufactured or fabricated or engineered NPs (ENPs)
may be present in soils, but these NPs may perhaps leach out
in the surroundings deliberately in diverse forms, which
include the metal oxides like CeO 2 , TiO 2 , ZnO NPs; metals
with zero valency such as Au, Ag and Fe NPs; as well as
metal salts like ceramics and nano-silicates; carbon derived
NMs such as carbon nanotubes; nano-polymers, e.g. polystyrene and latex; and semiconductor materials like CdSe,
CdTe; or accidentally by-products combustion or corrosion
(Belal and El-Ramady 2016). Because of the distribution of
NPs in soils, an alteration in their aggregated size, the stability of a suspension, transport as well as bioavailability
could be perceived. Hence, the research on the ENPs is
indispensable to comprehend their destiny along with associated danger (Philippe and Schaumann 2014; Sharma et al.
2015). The sol of these NPs is able to be exaggerated by
conditions of soil such as ionic strength, the amount of
dissolved organic matter as well as the biological and
chemical reactions (Li et al. 2016). The NPs coated by
dissolved organic matter, have their surface properties
altered. These properties include pore size, organic contaminants sorption parameter, surface area, aggregation
property and the toxicity mechanisms (Li et al. 2016).
According to Wang and Keller (2009), attributable to
complexity, no particular property is able to apply as a
common interpreter of the deposition as well as transport of
ENPs. Therefore, it is significantly essential to illustrate
quantitatively the transfer of ENPs in columns of soil (Pan
and Xing 2012). Hence, in conclusion, applications for the
environment and ENPs risk assessment in the soil significantly not independent on the appreciative of the interaction
between the NPs with the various components of soil ENPs
possibly will be functional for remediation of soil (Belal and
El-Ramady 2016). By reason of the soil system complexity
as well as the so primary stage of research of NPs in soils,
the appreciative of behaviour of NPs in this system is
exceptionally restricted.
2.2 Nanoparticles in Water
Nanoparticles are of different types like natural or engineered or incidental. Natural NPs include lunar dust, volcanic dust, soil particles and these natural NPs are present on
the earth since its birth (Belal and El-Ramady 2016). Incidental NPs are formed by human economic activity like coal
usage, fumes of iron welding, machinery in industries and
vehicle emission (Smita et al. 2012). ENPs are designed and
fabricated for their unique physicochemical property for
different applications. Different shapes and types of NPs are
made like metal-based NMs, carbon-based NMs, nanocomposites and dendrimers (Handy et al. 2008; Yadav et al.
2014). However, ultimately, all of these NPs are discharged
into aquatic bodies (Sharma et al. 2015). The term colloid is
sort of a generic term usually applied for particles having
size between 1 nm and 1 µm. In aquatic bodies, these NPs
Interaction of Nanoparticles with Microbes
177
Précédent

- 177/214

Suivant