68. Steinmetz C, Rettberg A, Ribeiro FGC et al (2018) Internet of things ontology for digital twin in
cyber physical systems. In: SBESC 2018: 2018 VIII Brazilian symposium on computing
systems engineering: proceedings: Salvador, Brazil, 6–9 November 2018. Conference Publishing Services, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, pp 154–159
69. Jung C, Eitel A, Schwarz R (2014) Enhancing cloud security with context-aware usage control
policies. In: Plödereder E, Grunske L, Schneider E et al (eds) Informatik 2014: Big Data –
Komplexität meistern: 22–26 September 2014, Stuttgart: proceedings. Gesellschaft für
Informatik, Bonn, pp 211–222
70. Bussard L, Neven G, Preiss F-S (2010) Downstream usage control. In: IEEE international
symposium on policies for distributed systems and networks (POLICY), 2010: 21–23 July
2010, Fairfax, Virginia, USA; proceedings. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 22–29
71. Zrenner J, Möller FO, Jung C et al (2019) Usage control architecture options for data sovereignty in business ecosystems. J Enterprise Inform Manag 32:477–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/
JEIM-03-2018-0058
72. International Data Spaces e.V. https://www.internationaldataspaces.org. Accessed 23 Jun 2020
73. (2020) DIN SPEC 27070:2020-03, Anforderungen und Referenzarchitektur eines Security
Gateways zum Austausch von Industriedaten und Diensten. https://doi.org/10.31030/3139499
74. (2020) Home|Industrie 4.0 Recht-Testbed. https://legaltestbed.org/en/start/. Accessed 21 Apr
2020
75. unn | UNITED NEWS NETWORK GmbH (2020) Die Bedeutung von IDS für die Europäische
Digital-Wirtschaft. https://www.pressebox.de/pressemitteilung/industrial-data-space-e-v/DieBedeutung-von-IDS-fuer-die-Europaeische-Digital-Wirtschaft/boxid/993608.
Accessed
21 Apr 2020
76. Siemens AG (2020) MindSphere. https://siemens.mindsphere.io. Accessed 28 May 2020
77. Werner R, Beugholt A, Takacs R, Geier D, Becker T, Sollacher R, Mauermann M,
Weißenberg N, Roest M, Istaitih J (2020) Standardized digitalization of an existing pudding
production by introducing a digital twin management system. International Dairy Magazine
78. Copa Cogeca, CEMA, Fertilizers Europe et al (2018) EU code of conduct on agriculture data
sharing: Guidelines for correct use of agriculture data. http://www.fao.org/family-farming/
detail/en/c/1127623/. Accessed 28 May 2020
79. Tebbje S, Karthikeyan G, Friesen M et al Entwicklung einer IT-Sicherheitsinfrastruktur für
verteilte Automatisierungssysteme: Schlussbericht zu IGF-Vorhaben Nr. 19117 N. https://
serwiss.bib.hs-hannover.de/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/1626/file/Schlussbericht_V31.pdf.
Accessed 27 May 2020
80. Singh S, Shehab E, Higgins N et al (2018) Challenges of digital twin in high value manufacturing. In: SAE technical paper series. SAE International400 commonwealth drive, Warrendale,
PA, USA
81. Colombo AW, Karnouskos S, Kaynak O et al (2017) Industrial cyberphysical systems: a
backbone of the fourth industrial revolution. EEE Ind Electron Mag 11:6–16. https://doi.org/
10.1109/MIE.2017.2648857
82. Biffl S, Eckhart M, Lüder A et al (2019) Security and quality in cyber-physical systems
engineering: with forewords by Robert M. Lee and Tom Gilb, 1st edn. Springer, Cham
83. Werner R, Beugholt B, Takacs R et al (2020) Digitalisierung einer bestehenden
Puddingproduktion – Implementierung eines Managementsystems für digitale Zwillinge.
molkerei-industrie: 24–28
84. EIT Food (2020) https://www.eitfood.eu/innovation/projects/the-development-of-organic-sup
ply-chains-that-drive-fair-transparent-and-healthy-options-for-the-consumer-2020. Accessed
21 Apr 2020
85. Über den CCIT (2020) https://www.cit.fraunhofer.de/de/ueber-ccit.html. Accessed 21 Apr
2020
86. Haße H, Li B, Weißenberg N et al (2019) Digital twin for real-time data processing in logistics.
Proceedings of the Hamburg international conference of logistics (HICL). https://doi.org/10.
15480/882.2462
The Challenge of Implementing Digital Twins in Operating Value Chains
165
cyber physical systems. In: SBESC 2018: 2018 VIII Brazilian symposium on computing
systems engineering: proceedings: Salvador, Brazil, 6–9 November 2018. Conference Publishing Services, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, pp 154–159
69. Jung C, Eitel A, Schwarz R (2014) Enhancing cloud security with context-aware usage control
policies. In: Plödereder E, Grunske L, Schneider E et al (eds) Informatik 2014: Big Data –
Komplexität meistern: 22–26 September 2014, Stuttgart: proceedings. Gesellschaft für
Informatik, Bonn, pp 211–222
70. Bussard L, Neven G, Preiss F-S (2010) Downstream usage control. In: IEEE international
symposium on policies for distributed systems and networks (POLICY), 2010: 21–23 July
2010, Fairfax, Virginia, USA; proceedings. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 22–29
71. Zrenner J, Möller FO, Jung C et al (2019) Usage control architecture options for data sovereignty in business ecosystems. J Enterprise Inform Manag 32:477–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/
JEIM-03-2018-0058
72. International Data Spaces e.V. https://www.internationaldataspaces.org. Accessed 23 Jun 2020
73. (2020) DIN SPEC 27070:2020-03, Anforderungen und Referenzarchitektur eines Security
Gateways zum Austausch von Industriedaten und Diensten. https://doi.org/10.31030/3139499
74. (2020) Home|Industrie 4.0 Recht-Testbed. https://legaltestbed.org/en/start/. Accessed 21 Apr
2020
75. unn | UNITED NEWS NETWORK GmbH (2020) Die Bedeutung von IDS für die Europäische
Digital-Wirtschaft. https://www.pressebox.de/pressemitteilung/industrial-data-space-e-v/DieBedeutung-von-IDS-fuer-die-Europaeische-Digital-Wirtschaft/boxid/993608.
Accessed
21 Apr 2020
76. Siemens AG (2020) MindSphere. https://siemens.mindsphere.io. Accessed 28 May 2020
77. Werner R, Beugholt A, Takacs R, Geier D, Becker T, Sollacher R, Mauermann M,
Weißenberg N, Roest M, Istaitih J (2020) Standardized digitalization of an existing pudding
production by introducing a digital twin management system. International Dairy Magazine
78. Copa Cogeca, CEMA, Fertilizers Europe et al (2018) EU code of conduct on agriculture data
sharing: Guidelines for correct use of agriculture data. http://www.fao.org/family-farming/
detail/en/c/1127623/. Accessed 28 May 2020
79. Tebbje S, Karthikeyan G, Friesen M et al Entwicklung einer IT-Sicherheitsinfrastruktur für
verteilte Automatisierungssysteme: Schlussbericht zu IGF-Vorhaben Nr. 19117 N. https://
serwiss.bib.hs-hannover.de/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/1626/file/Schlussbericht_V31.pdf.
Accessed 27 May 2020
80. Singh S, Shehab E, Higgins N et al (2018) Challenges of digital twin in high value manufacturing. In: SAE technical paper series. SAE International400 commonwealth drive, Warrendale,
PA, USA
81. Colombo AW, Karnouskos S, Kaynak O et al (2017) Industrial cyberphysical systems: a
backbone of the fourth industrial revolution. EEE Ind Electron Mag 11:6–16. https://doi.org/
10.1109/MIE.2017.2648857
82. Biffl S, Eckhart M, Lüder A et al (2019) Security and quality in cyber-physical systems
engineering: with forewords by Robert M. Lee and Tom Gilb, 1st edn. Springer, Cham
83. Werner R, Beugholt B, Takacs R et al (2020) Digitalisierung einer bestehenden
Puddingproduktion – Implementierung eines Managementsystems für digitale Zwillinge.
molkerei-industrie: 24–28
84. EIT Food (2020) https://www.eitfood.eu/innovation/projects/the-development-of-organic-sup
ply-chains-that-drive-fair-transparent-and-healthy-options-for-the-consumer-2020. Accessed
21 Apr 2020
85. Über den CCIT (2020) https://www.cit.fraunhofer.de/de/ueber-ccit.html. Accessed 21 Apr
2020
86. Haße H, Li B, Weißenberg N et al (2019) Digital twin for real-time data processing in logistics.
Proceedings of the Hamburg international conference of logistics (HICL). https://doi.org/10.
15480/882.2462
The Challenge of Implementing Digital Twins in Operating Value Chains
165