14.7 Non-Carbonaceous Nanostructures Obtained by Plasma Synthesis
523
Si [97], Zn and Mg [103]) or its compound than is catalytically oxidized (GaN to
yield Ga 2 O 3 [107]). In some cases, the setup used for oxide nanoparticle syntheses
was fully analogous to those found to be appropriate to produce metallic nanostructures, only the metals more prone to be oxidized led to the formation of the corresponding oxide [97, 100, 103]. Gallium oxide produced during the catalytic oxidation of an oxygen-containing buffer gas was obtained as highly crystalline nanorods
[107], while liquid-submerged setups were appropriate to yield oxide nanoparticles
[97, 100, 103, 108].
References
1. Ijima S (1991) Nature 354:56–58
2. Radushkevich LV, Lukyanovich VM (1952) Zurn Fisic Chim 26:88–95
3. Oberlin A, Endo M, Koyama T (1976) J Cryst Growth 32:335–349
4. Ebbesen TW, Ajayan PM (1992) Nature 358:220–222
5. Ijima S, Ichihashi T (1993) Nature 363:603–605
6. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Avouris P (2001) Carbon nanotubes: Synthesis, structure,
properties, and applications. Springer, Berlin
7. Dervishi E, Li Z, Xu Y, Saini V, Biris AR, Lupu D, Biris AS (2009) Particul Sci Technol
27:107–125
8. Baddour CE, Briens C (2005) Int J Chem React Eng 3:R3(1–22)
9. Szabó A, Perri C, Csató A, Giordano G, Vuono D, Nagy JB (2010) Materials 3:3092–3140
10. Ando Y, Zhao X (2006) New Diam Front C Tec 16:123–137
11. Ando Y (2010) J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10:3726–3738
12. Arora N, Sharma NN (2014) Diam Relat Mater 50:135–150
13. Su Y, Zhang Y (2015) Carbon 83:90–99
14. Ying LS, Salleh MAM, Yusoff HM, Rashid SBA, Razak JA (2011) J Ind Eng Chem 17:367–
376
15. Harris PJF (2007) Carbon 45:229–239
16. Kumar U, Sikarwar S, Sonker RK, Yadav BC (2016) J Inorg Organomet Polym 26:1231–1242
17. Choudhary V, Gupta A (2011) Polymer/Carbon nanotube nanocomposites. In: Yellampalli S
(ed) Carbon nanotubes—polymer nanocomposites. InTech Europe, Rijeka
18. Shi Z, Lian Y, Liao FH, Zhou X, Gu Z, Zhang Y, Iijima S, Li H, Yue KT, Zhang SL (2000) J
Phys Chem Solid 61:1031–1036
19. Huang H, Kajiura H, Tsutsui S, Murakami Y, Ata M (2003) J Phys Chem B 107:8794–8798
20. Ishigami M, Cumings J, Zettl A, Chen S (2000) Chem Phys Lett 319:457–459
21. Cui S, Scharff P, Siegmund C, Schneider D, Risch K, Klötzer S, Spiess L, Romanus H,
Schawohl J (2004) Carbon 42:931–939
22. Imasaka K, Kanatake Y, Ohshiro Y, Suehiro J, Hara M (2006) Thin Solid Films 506–507:250–
254
23. Chang BH, Xie SS, Zhou WY, Qian LX, Pan ZW, Mao JM, Li WZ (1998) J Mat Sci Lett
17:1015–1017
24. Wang XK, Lin XW, Dravid VP, Ketterson JB, Chang RPH (1995) Appl Phys Lett 66:2430–
2432
25. Setlur AA, Lauerhaas JM, Dai JY, Chang RPH (1996) Appl Phys Lett 69:345–347
26. Ando, Zhao X (2000) Mol Crys Liq Cryst Sci Technol A. 340:707–712
27. Tang DS, Zhou WY, Ci LJ, Yan XQ, Yuan HJ, Zhou ZP, Liang YX, Liu DF, Liu W (2002)
Chinese Phys 11:496–501
28. Ajayan PM, Lambert JM, Bemier P, Barbedette L, Colliex C, Planeix JM (1993) Chem Phys
Lett 215:509–517
523
Si [97], Zn and Mg [103]) or its compound than is catalytically oxidized (GaN to
yield Ga 2 O 3 [107]). In some cases, the setup used for oxide nanoparticle syntheses
was fully analogous to those found to be appropriate to produce metallic nanostructures, only the metals more prone to be oxidized led to the formation of the corresponding oxide [97, 100, 103]. Gallium oxide produced during the catalytic oxidation of an oxygen-containing buffer gas was obtained as highly crystalline nanorods
[107], while liquid-submerged setups were appropriate to yield oxide nanoparticles
[97, 100, 103, 108].
References
1. Ijima S (1991) Nature 354:56–58
2. Radushkevich LV, Lukyanovich VM (1952) Zurn Fisic Chim 26:88–95
3. Oberlin A, Endo M, Koyama T (1976) J Cryst Growth 32:335–349
4. Ebbesen TW, Ajayan PM (1992) Nature 358:220–222
5. Ijima S, Ichihashi T (1993) Nature 363:603–605
6. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Avouris P (2001) Carbon nanotubes: Synthesis, structure,
properties, and applications. Springer, Berlin
7. Dervishi E, Li Z, Xu Y, Saini V, Biris AR, Lupu D, Biris AS (2009) Particul Sci Technol
27:107–125
8. Baddour CE, Briens C (2005) Int J Chem React Eng 3:R3(1–22)
9. Szabó A, Perri C, Csató A, Giordano G, Vuono D, Nagy JB (2010) Materials 3:3092–3140
10. Ando Y, Zhao X (2006) New Diam Front C Tec 16:123–137
11. Ando Y (2010) J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10:3726–3738
12. Arora N, Sharma NN (2014) Diam Relat Mater 50:135–150
13. Su Y, Zhang Y (2015) Carbon 83:90–99
14. Ying LS, Salleh MAM, Yusoff HM, Rashid SBA, Razak JA (2011) J Ind Eng Chem 17:367–
376
15. Harris PJF (2007) Carbon 45:229–239
16. Kumar U, Sikarwar S, Sonker RK, Yadav BC (2016) J Inorg Organomet Polym 26:1231–1242
17. Choudhary V, Gupta A (2011) Polymer/Carbon nanotube nanocomposites. In: Yellampalli S
(ed) Carbon nanotubes—polymer nanocomposites. InTech Europe, Rijeka
18. Shi Z, Lian Y, Liao FH, Zhou X, Gu Z, Zhang Y, Iijima S, Li H, Yue KT, Zhang SL (2000) J
Phys Chem Solid 61:1031–1036
19. Huang H, Kajiura H, Tsutsui S, Murakami Y, Ata M (2003) J Phys Chem B 107:8794–8798
20. Ishigami M, Cumings J, Zettl A, Chen S (2000) Chem Phys Lett 319:457–459
21. Cui S, Scharff P, Siegmund C, Schneider D, Risch K, Klötzer S, Spiess L, Romanus H,
Schawohl J (2004) Carbon 42:931–939
22. Imasaka K, Kanatake Y, Ohshiro Y, Suehiro J, Hara M (2006) Thin Solid Films 506–507:250–
254
23. Chang BH, Xie SS, Zhou WY, Qian LX, Pan ZW, Mao JM, Li WZ (1998) J Mat Sci Lett
17:1015–1017
24. Wang XK, Lin XW, Dravid VP, Ketterson JB, Chang RPH (1995) Appl Phys Lett 66:2430–
2432
25. Setlur AA, Lauerhaas JM, Dai JY, Chang RPH (1996) Appl Phys Lett 69:345–347
26. Ando, Zhao X (2000) Mol Crys Liq Cryst Sci Technol A. 340:707–712
27. Tang DS, Zhou WY, Ci LJ, Yan XQ, Yuan HJ, Zhou ZP, Liang YX, Liu DF, Liu W (2002)
Chinese Phys 11:496–501
28. Ajayan PM, Lambert JM, Bemier P, Barbedette L, Colliex C, Planeix JM (1993) Chem Phys
Lett 215:509–517