522
V. Iancu and L. Cindea
he has more strength and resolve much better the static and dynamic loads, than the
rubber bearings.
References
1. M. Kumar, A.S. Whittaker, M.C. Constantinou, Characterizing friction in sliding isolation
bearings. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44(9), 1409–1425 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.
2524
2. E. Pavlou, M.C. Constantinou, Response of nonstructural components in structures with damping
systems. J. Struct. Eng. 132(7), 1108–1117 (2006)
3. A.K. Chopra, Dynamics of Structures Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 2nd
edn. (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2001)
4. J.M. Kelly, The role of damping in seismic isolation. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 3–20 (1999)
5. G.-R. Gillich, A.A. Minda, N. Gillich, C. ¸
S. Jurc˘ au, C.M. Iavornic, Robust friction pendulum with
parameterized sliding surfaces, in 1st International Conference on Sustainable Development,
Sustainable Chemical Industry, Pollution, Hazards and Environment, pp. 13–15 (2012)
6. V.A. Zayas, S.S. Low, S.A. Mahin, A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation.
Earthquake Spectra 6, 317–333 (1990)
7. D. Nedelcu, V. Iancu, G.-R. Gillich, S.L. Bogdan, Study on the effect of the friction coefficient
on the response of structures isolated with friction pendulums. Vibroeng. Procedia 19, 6–11
(2018)
8. https://www.nh.gov/dot/org/projectdevelopment/bridgedesign/documents/webbrmanual.pdf.
Last accessed 2019/05/12
9. https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/aisc/publications/standards/seismic-provisions-for-struct
ural-steel-buildings-ansi-aisc-341-16.pdf. Last accessed 2019/05/13
V. Iancu and L. Cindea
he has more strength and resolve much better the static and dynamic loads, than the
rubber bearings.
References
1. M. Kumar, A.S. Whittaker, M.C. Constantinou, Characterizing friction in sliding isolation
bearings. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44(9), 1409–1425 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.
2524
2. E. Pavlou, M.C. Constantinou, Response of nonstructural components in structures with damping
systems. J. Struct. Eng. 132(7), 1108–1117 (2006)
3. A.K. Chopra, Dynamics of Structures Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 2nd
edn. (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2001)
4. J.M. Kelly, The role of damping in seismic isolation. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 3–20 (1999)
5. G.-R. Gillich, A.A. Minda, N. Gillich, C. ¸
S. Jurc˘ au, C.M. Iavornic, Robust friction pendulum with
parameterized sliding surfaces, in 1st International Conference on Sustainable Development,
Sustainable Chemical Industry, Pollution, Hazards and Environment, pp. 13–15 (2012)
6. V.A. Zayas, S.S. Low, S.A. Mahin, A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation.
Earthquake Spectra 6, 317–333 (1990)
7. D. Nedelcu, V. Iancu, G.-R. Gillich, S.L. Bogdan, Study on the effect of the friction coefficient
on the response of structures isolated with friction pendulums. Vibroeng. Procedia 19, 6–11
(2018)
8. https://www.nh.gov/dot/org/projectdevelopment/bridgedesign/documents/webbrmanual.pdf.
Last accessed 2019/05/12
9. https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/aisc/publications/standards/seismic-provisions-for-struct
ural-steel-buildings-ansi-aisc-341-16.pdf. Last accessed 2019/05/13