162
novel three-dimension printing-aided fabrication technique for cranial and/or orbital reconstruction. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 29(5), e438–e440. https://doi.org/10.1097/
scs.0000000000004451.
McMenamin, P. G., Quayle, M. R., Mchenry, C. R., & Adams, J. W. (2014). The production of
anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anatomical
Sciences Education, 7(6), 479–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1475.
Mi, L., & Jiang, S. (2014). Integrated antimicrobial and nonfouling zwitterionic polymers.
Angewandte Chemie – International Edition, 53(7), 1746–1754. https://doi.org/10.1002/
anie.201304060.
Mills, D. K., Jammalamadaka, U., Tappa, K., & Weisman, J. (2018). Studies on the cytocompatibility, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of 3D printed poly(methyl methacrylate)
beads. Bioactive Materials., 3(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.01.006.
Molinero-Mourelle, P., Canals, S., Gómez-Polo, M., Solá-Ruiz, M., del Río Highsmith, J., &
Viñuela, A. (2018). Polylactic acid as a material for three-dimensional printing of provisional restorations. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 31(4), 349–350. https://doi.
org/10.11607/ijp.5709.
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014). 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotechnology,
32(8), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958.
Muwaffak, Z., Goyanes, A., Clark, V., Basit, A. W., Hilton, S. T., & Gaisford, S. (2017).
Patient-specific 3D scanned and 3D printed antimicrobial polycaprolactone wound dressings. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 527(1–2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijpharm.2017.04.077.
Najeeb, S., Zafar, M. S., Khurshid, Z., & Siddiqui, F. (2016). Applications of polyetheretherketone
(PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 60(1),
12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001.
Nieminen, T., Kallela, I., Wuolijoki, E., Kainulainen, H., Hiidenheimo, I., & Rantala, I. (2008).
Amorphous and crystalline polyetheretherketone: Mechanical properties and tissue reactions
during a 3-year follow-up. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part A, 84(2), 377–383.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31310.
Pantazi, A., Totu, E. E., Dorobantu, D., Cristache, C. M., & Enachescu, M. (2018). Poly(methyl
metacrylate) nanocomposites for two-piece CAD/CAM solution as an alternative to monolithic
removable prosthesis. Materiale Plastice, 55(4), 634–639.
Popa, A., Davidescu, C. M., Trif, R., Ilia, G., Iliescu, S., & Dehelean, G. (2003). Study of quaternary “onium” salts grafted on polymers: Antibacterial activity of quaternary phosphonium salts
grafted on “gel-type” styrene-divinylbenzene copolymers. Reactive and Functional Polymers,
55(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1381-5148(02)00224-9.
Rahmitasari, F., Ishida, Y., Kurahashi, K., Matsuda, T., Watanabe, M., & Ichikawa, T. (2017).
PEEK with reinforced materials and modifications for dental implant applications. Dentistry
Journal, 5(4), –35. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj5040035.
Rebong, R. E., Stewart, K. T., Utreja, A., & Ghoneima, A. A. (2018). Accuracy of three- dimensional
dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study. Angle Orthodontist, 88(3), 363–369. https://doi.
org/10.2319/071117-460.1.
Revilla-León, M., & Özcan, M. (2019). Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: Current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. Journal of
Prosthodontics, 28(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12801.
Revilla-León, M., Meyers, M. J., Zandinejad, A., & Özcan, M. (2019). A review on chemical
composition, mechanical properties, and manufacturing work flow of additively manufactured
current polymers for interim dental restorations. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry,
31(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12438.
Rho, J. Y., Ashman, R. B., & Turner, C. H. (1993). Young’s modulus of trabecular and cortical
bone material: Ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. Journal of Biomechanics, 26(2),
111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90042-d.
C. M. Cristache and E. E. Totu
novel three-dimension printing-aided fabrication technique for cranial and/or orbital reconstruction. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 29(5), e438–e440. https://doi.org/10.1097/
scs.0000000000004451.
McMenamin, P. G., Quayle, M. R., Mchenry, C. R., & Adams, J. W. (2014). The production of
anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anatomical
Sciences Education, 7(6), 479–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1475.
Mi, L., & Jiang, S. (2014). Integrated antimicrobial and nonfouling zwitterionic polymers.
Angewandte Chemie – International Edition, 53(7), 1746–1754. https://doi.org/10.1002/
anie.201304060.
Mills, D. K., Jammalamadaka, U., Tappa, K., & Weisman, J. (2018). Studies on the cytocompatibility, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of 3D printed poly(methyl methacrylate)
beads. Bioactive Materials., 3(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.01.006.
Molinero-Mourelle, P., Canals, S., Gómez-Polo, M., Solá-Ruiz, M., del Río Highsmith, J., &
Viñuela, A. (2018). Polylactic acid as a material for three-dimensional printing of provisional restorations. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 31(4), 349–350. https://doi.
org/10.11607/ijp.5709.
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014). 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotechnology,
32(8), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958.
Muwaffak, Z., Goyanes, A., Clark, V., Basit, A. W., Hilton, S. T., & Gaisford, S. (2017).
Patient-specific 3D scanned and 3D printed antimicrobial polycaprolactone wound dressings. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 527(1–2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijpharm.2017.04.077.
Najeeb, S., Zafar, M. S., Khurshid, Z., & Siddiqui, F. (2016). Applications of polyetheretherketone
(PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 60(1),
12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001.
Nieminen, T., Kallela, I., Wuolijoki, E., Kainulainen, H., Hiidenheimo, I., & Rantala, I. (2008).
Amorphous and crystalline polyetheretherketone: Mechanical properties and tissue reactions
during a 3-year follow-up. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part A, 84(2), 377–383.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31310.
Pantazi, A., Totu, E. E., Dorobantu, D., Cristache, C. M., & Enachescu, M. (2018). Poly(methyl
metacrylate) nanocomposites for two-piece CAD/CAM solution as an alternative to monolithic
removable prosthesis. Materiale Plastice, 55(4), 634–639.
Popa, A., Davidescu, C. M., Trif, R., Ilia, G., Iliescu, S., & Dehelean, G. (2003). Study of quaternary “onium” salts grafted on polymers: Antibacterial activity of quaternary phosphonium salts
grafted on “gel-type” styrene-divinylbenzene copolymers. Reactive and Functional Polymers,
55(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1381-5148(02)00224-9.
Rahmitasari, F., Ishida, Y., Kurahashi, K., Matsuda, T., Watanabe, M., & Ichikawa, T. (2017).
PEEK with reinforced materials and modifications for dental implant applications. Dentistry
Journal, 5(4), –35. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj5040035.
Rebong, R. E., Stewart, K. T., Utreja, A., & Ghoneima, A. A. (2018). Accuracy of three- dimensional
dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study. Angle Orthodontist, 88(3), 363–369. https://doi.
org/10.2319/071117-460.1.
Revilla-León, M., & Özcan, M. (2019). Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: Current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. Journal of
Prosthodontics, 28(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12801.
Revilla-León, M., Meyers, M. J., Zandinejad, A., & Özcan, M. (2019). A review on chemical
composition, mechanical properties, and manufacturing work flow of additively manufactured
current polymers for interim dental restorations. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry,
31(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12438.
Rho, J. Y., Ashman, R. B., & Turner, C. H. (1993). Young’s modulus of trabecular and cortical
bone material: Ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. Journal of Biomechanics, 26(2),
111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90042-d.
C. M. Cristache and E. E. Totu