23
Focusing America’s efforts on areas of the world with the greatest military threats
and economic wealth, the Asia strategy was a clear proof of the Obama administration’s pursuit of realist doctrines. The Obama administration’s foreign policy was
not trying to change the world but accepts the world as it is. He was cautious in the
use of military force, opposes the struggle to promote democracy and human rights
in a bid to promote democracy and human rights, and insisted that other countries
must play a role in maintaining global order responsibility. At the same time, according to the principles of realism, Obama’s foreign policy was neither isolated nor
peaceful. He did not hesitate to use military force when it came to the belief that it
could bring good results at an affordable cost. Obama also showed that he considered this realistic concern that resources should not be wasted on marginal threats,
and that the country should be placed in a state of emergency in countering the
future challenges of powerful enemies (Ebrahimi 2017:101).
The various political, military, economic, and social strategies the US used during the Cold War against the Soviet Union were justified on the basis of a need to
contain and limit communism and prevent the rise of its satellites. Before and after
the collapse of communism and socialist models in the world, each President presented rituals and orders. Reagan’s agenda involved shoring up military power after
a period of decline, maintaining economic power, and preserving America’s role as a
global leader. George Bush’s father focuses on delegating to allies the United States’
role in dealing with threats against itself, managing security through arms control
agreements, strategic deterrence, and reinforcement of conventional missile and conventional capabilities. Democracy in the Soviet Union was encouraged, as well as
measures to prevent the transfer of military weapons technology to countries and
hostile groups. Military balance was maintained in some parts of the region to prevent other powers from dominating it (www.donya-e-eqtesad.com 2017).
The Clinton administration also focuses on three main areas of focus: Enhancing
the security of the country with the help of military force, strengthening economic
power and economic revivals, and expanding democracy in the world (Matin
2012:45).
States are forced to gain power in order to ensure survival and security, and as a
result of competing for power, it becomes a permanent issue in relations between
states; therefore, international politics is defined as a permanent field of competition
for power gain. But since Waltz’s goal, in his words, is to explain international politics and not the foreign policy of governments, how foreign policy is regulated and
how existing tools are used, is defined as an activity outside the realm of the theory
of neoreality. In other words, the role of energy resources in foreign policy will
require the adoption of a microlevel of analysis, while in the theory of neoreality,
states will be viewed as actors of the same function, and an attempt is not made to
explain the behavior of a particular state (Donnelly 2000:16–18).
George Bush’s strategy involved supporting human dignity aspirations, strengthening alliances to defeat global terrorism, and taking action to prevent attacks
against America by working with others to neutralize regional conflicts and deterring enemies. The beginning of a new era of global economic growth through trade
Basic Qualitative Research Stages
Focusing America’s efforts on areas of the world with the greatest military threats
and economic wealth, the Asia strategy was a clear proof of the Obama administration’s pursuit of realist doctrines. The Obama administration’s foreign policy was
not trying to change the world but accepts the world as it is. He was cautious in the
use of military force, opposes the struggle to promote democracy and human rights
in a bid to promote democracy and human rights, and insisted that other countries
must play a role in maintaining global order responsibility. At the same time, according to the principles of realism, Obama’s foreign policy was neither isolated nor
peaceful. He did not hesitate to use military force when it came to the belief that it
could bring good results at an affordable cost. Obama also showed that he considered this realistic concern that resources should not be wasted on marginal threats,
and that the country should be placed in a state of emergency in countering the
future challenges of powerful enemies (Ebrahimi 2017:101).
The various political, military, economic, and social strategies the US used during the Cold War against the Soviet Union were justified on the basis of a need to
contain and limit communism and prevent the rise of its satellites. Before and after
the collapse of communism and socialist models in the world, each President presented rituals and orders. Reagan’s agenda involved shoring up military power after
a period of decline, maintaining economic power, and preserving America’s role as a
global leader. George Bush’s father focuses on delegating to allies the United States’
role in dealing with threats against itself, managing security through arms control
agreements, strategic deterrence, and reinforcement of conventional missile and conventional capabilities. Democracy in the Soviet Union was encouraged, as well as
measures to prevent the transfer of military weapons technology to countries and
hostile groups. Military balance was maintained in some parts of the region to prevent other powers from dominating it (www.donya-e-eqtesad.com 2017).
The Clinton administration also focuses on three main areas of focus: Enhancing
the security of the country with the help of military force, strengthening economic
power and economic revivals, and expanding democracy in the world (Matin
2012:45).
States are forced to gain power in order to ensure survival and security, and as a
result of competing for power, it becomes a permanent issue in relations between
states; therefore, international politics is defined as a permanent field of competition
for power gain. But since Waltz’s goal, in his words, is to explain international politics and not the foreign policy of governments, how foreign policy is regulated and
how existing tools are used, is defined as an activity outside the realm of the theory
of neoreality. In other words, the role of energy resources in foreign policy will
require the adoption of a microlevel of analysis, while in the theory of neoreality,
states will be viewed as actors of the same function, and an attempt is not made to
explain the behavior of a particular state (Donnelly 2000:16–18).
George Bush’s strategy involved supporting human dignity aspirations, strengthening alliances to defeat global terrorism, and taking action to prevent attacks
against America by working with others to neutralize regional conflicts and deterring enemies. The beginning of a new era of global economic growth through trade
Basic Qualitative Research Stages