183
in different parts of the United States. If policymakers focus only on the positive side of
price cuts, they will ignore the big challenges that will be created for US domestic production and in the same way for economic growth and security in the United States. (Paul
2015:7)
Another important point is that it is neglected that the price trend of unconventional oil shows that the production of this product has been sloping. What is unusual
is that oil production in the US at first was at an average of $90–$100, while today
it has reached a limit of $40 in some basins. It can be expected that the sophisticated
scientific and industrial initiatives of the United States would bring the average to
lower boundaries (Madani 2014:12).
Hillary Clinton’s Pivot to Asia
One of the Obama administration’s policies which had the most impact on Central
Asia and the Caspian was the “Pivot to Asia.” Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State
declared the US new policy toward Asia and US objectives as to:
…expand our bilateral partnerships; actively support India’s Look East efforts, including
through a new trilateral dialogue with India and Japan; and outline a new vision for a more
economically integrated and politically stable South and Central Asia, with India as a linchpin. (www.foreignpolicy.com 2017a, b, c)
America’s focus centered on strategic issues in the Asia-Pacific region. Over the
past few months, this policy raised at least theoretically in the growing prevalence
of the phrase “Pivot to Asia” as used in various political and intellectual centers of
the United States. In short, all discussions posited that the Asia–Asia-Pacific region
would be the strategic focal point in the future of global relations, the point follows
that despite this, the United States not as yet paid enough attention to the strategic
issues of the region. Furthermore, a switch in focus toward Asia consequently signals lessening level of US involvement in the Middle East. Of course, despite the
plentiful designs of the Pivot to Asia concept, its precise and technical frameworks
were unclear, and it can be said that its conceptual and operational coherence in the
media and the public has not been clearly and clearly depicted (www.acacompany.
net 2018). But it is clear that the United States intended to focus on the Asia region
and was symbolically symbolized in Obama’s travel to several small East Asian
countries and the start of a trip to Burma after the presidential election, followed by
the East Asian summit, reflecting the focus of the United States. In addition, in
recent months, US political and security officials traveled to the smaller countries of
the region (www.acacompany.net, 2018).
When it comes to the facts, it is clear in the first place that the United States has
been struggling to change its global leadership and global hegemony over the course
of the Obama era, in the context of international affairs and the mechanisms of its
hegemony, and that these developments cannot be ignored. The most prominent of
them in the Middle East is the acceptance of Islamists like the Muslim Brotherhood
Hillary Clinton’s Pivot to Asia
in different parts of the United States. If policymakers focus only on the positive side of
price cuts, they will ignore the big challenges that will be created for US domestic production and in the same way for economic growth and security in the United States. (Paul
2015:7)
Another important point is that it is neglected that the price trend of unconventional oil shows that the production of this product has been sloping. What is unusual
is that oil production in the US at first was at an average of $90–$100, while today
it has reached a limit of $40 in some basins. It can be expected that the sophisticated
scientific and industrial initiatives of the United States would bring the average to
lower boundaries (Madani 2014:12).
Hillary Clinton’s Pivot to Asia
One of the Obama administration’s policies which had the most impact on Central
Asia and the Caspian was the “Pivot to Asia.” Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State
declared the US new policy toward Asia and US objectives as to:
…expand our bilateral partnerships; actively support India’s Look East efforts, including
through a new trilateral dialogue with India and Japan; and outline a new vision for a more
economically integrated and politically stable South and Central Asia, with India as a linchpin. (www.foreignpolicy.com 2017a, b, c)
America’s focus centered on strategic issues in the Asia-Pacific region. Over the
past few months, this policy raised at least theoretically in the growing prevalence
of the phrase “Pivot to Asia” as used in various political and intellectual centers of
the United States. In short, all discussions posited that the Asia–Asia-Pacific region
would be the strategic focal point in the future of global relations, the point follows
that despite this, the United States not as yet paid enough attention to the strategic
issues of the region. Furthermore, a switch in focus toward Asia consequently signals lessening level of US involvement in the Middle East. Of course, despite the
plentiful designs of the Pivot to Asia concept, its precise and technical frameworks
were unclear, and it can be said that its conceptual and operational coherence in the
media and the public has not been clearly and clearly depicted (www.acacompany.
net 2018). But it is clear that the United States intended to focus on the Asia region
and was symbolically symbolized in Obama’s travel to several small East Asian
countries and the start of a trip to Burma after the presidential election, followed by
the East Asian summit, reflecting the focus of the United States. In addition, in
recent months, US political and security officials traveled to the smaller countries of
the region (www.acacompany.net, 2018).
When it comes to the facts, it is clear in the first place that the United States has
been struggling to change its global leadership and global hegemony over the course
of the Obama era, in the context of international affairs and the mechanisms of its
hegemony, and that these developments cannot be ignored. The most prominent of
them in the Middle East is the acceptance of Islamists like the Muslim Brotherhood
Hillary Clinton’s Pivot to Asia