126
has led to employment and the production of goods and services. The lack of investment in production is less relevant to GDP figures, the rise of China, European
problems, regulatory provisions, and political interventions (Mason 2015:320).
In the 1960s and 1970s, many companies invested about 40% of their income,
but cash and income are now being used in the stock market because they are faster
on higher income. In the period from 2005 to 2015, 500 huge companies have
redeemed about $4 trillion of their stock (Foroohar 2016:131). The corporate strategy is based on the principle of transferring their income outside of the United
States to lower their taxes and gradually increase their market share (Economist,
March 18, 2017:62); or the new US administration that a trillion dollars of US
corporate money outside of this country can go back to the United States without
taxes (Economist, March 18, 2017:19).
America’s foreign policy moves in a series of shifts; first, raising customs rates
and facilitating exports and investment in the United States will bring more attention to the working and employee categories and increase the production of
American products, which will supply an introduction to the policy of supporting
the domestic industry. Undoubtedly, the transfer of production at a much lower cost
than the West to Asia has increased the areas of conflict and trade, customs, and,
consequently, political conflict. The change in foreign direct investment is also very
evident in this case. From 2011 to 2013, this figure fell from US $91 billion to US
$37 billion. During the same period, ASEAN’s share increased from 152 to 213 billion dollars. The share of Japan and the European Union also changed from 97 to
229 and 296 to 269 billion dollars (https://ustr.gov/:2020).
The second change is to create new opportunities for arms sales, especially in the
Middle East. If there is no conflict and war, large arms companies will have a problem with production and sales; therefore, naturally, the Middle East is a very important area in the global equation of states and large arms manufacturing companies.
The United States has 150,560 personnel in 150 countries, of which 44,800 are
based in the Middle East and Central Asia. The United States has a worldwide presence of approximately 800 military bases and an estimated cost of $156 billion (11).
US military spending in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan is estimated at $4.3 trillion.
Political instability and military confrontation are in the interests of these gunfire
companies. The three countries, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates,
bought only $113 billion in weapons in 2015 (Wright 2016).
Fluctuations in the Dollar Exchange Rate and Oil Price
Changes
One of the methods which the United States took control of the global oil market
processes, as a result of expanding global hegemony post World War II, was the
hegemony of the Dollar following the Woods Conference in 1944 and its, Was use
as a currency for oil deals. In fact, the United States sought to secure its own inter4 George W. Bush Energy Diplomacy
has led to employment and the production of goods and services. The lack of investment in production is less relevant to GDP figures, the rise of China, European
problems, regulatory provisions, and political interventions (Mason 2015:320).
In the 1960s and 1970s, many companies invested about 40% of their income,
but cash and income are now being used in the stock market because they are faster
on higher income. In the period from 2005 to 2015, 500 huge companies have
redeemed about $4 trillion of their stock (Foroohar 2016:131). The corporate strategy is based on the principle of transferring their income outside of the United
States to lower their taxes and gradually increase their market share (Economist,
March 18, 2017:62); or the new US administration that a trillion dollars of US
corporate money outside of this country can go back to the United States without
taxes (Economist, March 18, 2017:19).
America’s foreign policy moves in a series of shifts; first, raising customs rates
and facilitating exports and investment in the United States will bring more attention to the working and employee categories and increase the production of
American products, which will supply an introduction to the policy of supporting
the domestic industry. Undoubtedly, the transfer of production at a much lower cost
than the West to Asia has increased the areas of conflict and trade, customs, and,
consequently, political conflict. The change in foreign direct investment is also very
evident in this case. From 2011 to 2013, this figure fell from US $91 billion to US
$37 billion. During the same period, ASEAN’s share increased from 152 to 213 billion dollars. The share of Japan and the European Union also changed from 97 to
229 and 296 to 269 billion dollars (https://ustr.gov/:2020).
The second change is to create new opportunities for arms sales, especially in the
Middle East. If there is no conflict and war, large arms companies will have a problem with production and sales; therefore, naturally, the Middle East is a very important area in the global equation of states and large arms manufacturing companies.
The United States has 150,560 personnel in 150 countries, of which 44,800 are
based in the Middle East and Central Asia. The United States has a worldwide presence of approximately 800 military bases and an estimated cost of $156 billion (11).
US military spending in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan is estimated at $4.3 trillion.
Political instability and military confrontation are in the interests of these gunfire
companies. The three countries, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates,
bought only $113 billion in weapons in 2015 (Wright 2016).
Fluctuations in the Dollar Exchange Rate and Oil Price
Changes
One of the methods which the United States took control of the global oil market
processes, as a result of expanding global hegemony post World War II, was the
hegemony of the Dollar following the Woods Conference in 1944 and its, Was use
as a currency for oil deals. In fact, the United States sought to secure its own inter4 George W. Bush Energy Diplomacy