Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Nanotechnology Research Center
and the Human Health Therapeutics Research Center at the
National Research Council of Canada.
References
1. Dubochet J et al (1988) Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens. Q Rev Biophys 21
(2):129–228
2. Bartesaghi A et al (2018) Atomic resolution
cryo-EM structure of β-galactosidase. Structure 26:848
3. Merk A et al (2016) Breaking cryo-EM resolution barriers to facilitate drug discovery. Cell
165:1698–1707
4. Kuntsche J et al (2011) Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) for
studying the morphology of colloidal drug
delivery systems. Int J Pharm 417:120–137
5. Venkataraman S et al (2011) The effects of
polymeric nanostructure shape on drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63:1228–1246
6. Paul AL et al (2012) Immunoelectron microscopy: a reliable tool for the analysis of cellular
processes. In: Applications of immunocytochemistry. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp 65–96
7. Jia Y et al (2019) A comparison of the immune
responses induced by antigens in three
different archaeosome-based vaccine formulations. Int J Pharm 561:187–196
8. Whitfield DM et al (2016) Sulfated-glycolipids
as adjuvants for vaccines. National Research
Council of Canada. Patent No. WO/2016/
004512
9. Aebi U et al (1987) A glow discharge unit to
render electron microscope grids and other
surfaces hydrophilic. J Electron Microsc Tech
7:29–33
10. Egerton RF (2013) Control of radiation damage
in
the
TEM.
Ultramicroscopy
127:100–108
11. Glaeser RM (1971) Limitations to significant
information in biological electron microscopy
as a result of radiation damage. J Ultrastruct
Res 36:466–482
12. Lawrence MC (1992) Least-squares methods
of alignment using markers. In: Frank J
(ed)
Electron
tomography.
Plenum,
New York, pp 197–204
Cryo-TEM for Vaccine Delivery Carrier Evaluation
511
Précédent

- 519/595

Suivant