96
D. Makieła et al.
0.0031
0.0032
0.0033
1/T [1/K ]
l n (D /D
0 )
0.0034
0.0035
0.0036
bulk water
–1.9
–2.0
–2.1
–2.2
–2.3
Fig. 6.7 Thermal activation (Arrhenius plot) of the translational diffusion of water molecules in
bulk system
Table 6.2 The activation energy E A and D 0 coefficient of water confined in reverse micelle
formed from 58 DMPC molecules and for the bulk water system
Water confined in reverse micelle
Bulk water
D 0 [10 −8 m 2 /s]
2.00
5.59
E A [KJ/mol]
12.025
5.14
References
1. Shah DO (1998) Micelles, microemulsions, and monolayers. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York
2. Fathi H, Kelly JP, Vasquez VR, Graeve OA (2012) Ionic concentration effects on reverse
micelle size and stability: implications for the synthesis of nanoparticles. Langmuir 28:9267–
9274. https://doi.org/10.1021/la300586f
3. Kachel A, Gburski Z (1997) Chain formation in a model dipolar liquid: computer simulation
study. J Phys Condens Matter 9:10095–10100. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/9/46/007
4. Pal S, Balasubramanian S, Bagchi B (2003) Identity, energy, and environment of
interfacial water molecules in a micellar solution. J Phys Chem B 107:5194–5202.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp022349+
5. Piatek A, Dawid A, Gburski Z (2006) The existence of a plastic phase and a solidliquid dynamical bistability region in small fullerene cluster (C-60)(7): molecular dynamics
simulation. J Phys Cond-Matter 18:8471–8480. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/18/37/006
6. Raczynski P, Gorny K, Pabiszczak M, Gburski Z (2013) Nanoindentation of
biomembrane by carbon nanotubes – MD simulation. Comp Mat Science 70:13–18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.12.031
D. Makieła et al.
0.0031
0.0032
0.0033
1/T [1/K ]
l n (D /D
0 )
0.0034
0.0035
0.0036
bulk water
–1.9
–2.0
–2.1
–2.2
–2.3
Fig. 6.7 Thermal activation (Arrhenius plot) of the translational diffusion of water molecules in
bulk system
Table 6.2 The activation energy E A and D 0 coefficient of water confined in reverse micelle
formed from 58 DMPC molecules and for the bulk water system
Water confined in reverse micelle
Bulk water
D 0 [10 −8 m 2 /s]
2.00
5.59
E A [KJ/mol]
12.025
5.14
References
1. Shah DO (1998) Micelles, microemulsions, and monolayers. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York
2. Fathi H, Kelly JP, Vasquez VR, Graeve OA (2012) Ionic concentration effects on reverse
micelle size and stability: implications for the synthesis of nanoparticles. Langmuir 28:9267–
9274. https://doi.org/10.1021/la300586f
3. Kachel A, Gburski Z (1997) Chain formation in a model dipolar liquid: computer simulation
study. J Phys Condens Matter 9:10095–10100. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/9/46/007
4. Pal S, Balasubramanian S, Bagchi B (2003) Identity, energy, and environment of
interfacial water molecules in a micellar solution. J Phys Chem B 107:5194–5202.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp022349+
5. Piatek A, Dawid A, Gburski Z (2006) The existence of a plastic phase and a solidliquid dynamical bistability region in small fullerene cluster (C-60)(7): molecular dynamics
simulation. J Phys Cond-Matter 18:8471–8480. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/18/37/006
6. Raczynski P, Gorny K, Pabiszczak M, Gburski Z (2013) Nanoindentation of
biomembrane by carbon nanotubes – MD simulation. Comp Mat Science 70:13–18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.12.031