610
63. Taghizadeh M, Akhoundzadeh H, Rezayan A, Sadeghian M (2018) Excellent catalytic performance of 3D-mesoporous KIT-6 supported Cu and Ce nanoparticles in methanol steam
reforming. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:10926–10937
64. Lenarda M, Moretti E, Storaro L, Patrono P, Pinzari F, Rodriguez-Castellon E, JimenezLopez A, Busca G, Finocchio E, Montanari T, Frattini R (2006) Finely dispersed Pd-Zn catalyst supported on an organized mesoporous alumina for hydrogen production by methanol
steam reforming. Appl Catal A Gen 312:220–228
65. Deshmane VG, Owen SL, Abrokwah RY, Kuila D (2015) Mesoporous nanocrystalline TiO 2
supported metal (cu, co, Ni, Pd, Zn, and Sn) catalysts: effect of metal-support interactions on
steam reforming of methanol. J Mol Catal A Chem 408:202–213
66. Tajrishi OZ, Taghizadeh M, Kiadehi AD (2018) Methanol steam reforming in a microchannel reactor by Zn-, Ce- and Zr- modified mesoporous cu/SBA-15 nanocatalyst. Int J Hydrog
Energy 43:14103–14120
67. Zhao D, Sun J, Li Q, Stucky GD (2000) Morphological control of highly ordered mesoporous
silica SBA-15. Chem Mater 12:275–279
68. Araujo VD, Bellido JDA, Bernardi MIB, Assaf JM, Assaf EM (2012) CuO-CeO 2 catalysts
synthesized in one-step: characterization and PROX performance. Int J Hydrog Energy
37:5498–5507
69. Kleitz F, Berube F, Guillet-Nicolas R, Yang C-M, Thommes M (2010) Probing adsorption,
pore condensation, and hysteresis behavior of pure fluids in three-dimensional cubic mesoporous KIT-6 silica. J Phys Chem C 114:9344–9355
70. Wan H, Li X, Ji S, Huang B, Wang K, Li C (2007) Effect of Ni loading and Ce x Zr 1-x O 2
promoter on Ni based SBA-15 catalysts for steam reforming of methane. J Nat Gas Chem
16:139–147
71. Panpranot J, Goodwin JG Jr, Sayari A (2002) Synthesis and characteristics of MCM-41 supported CoRu catalysts. Catal Today 77:269–284
72. Abrokwah RY, Dade W, Owen SL, Deshmane V, Rahman M, Kuila D (2016) Effects of mesoporous supports and metals on steam reforming of alcohols [Chapter 6]. In: Nanda S, Sarangi
PK, Vo D-VN (eds) Fuel processing and energy utilization. Taylor and Francis, New York,
pp 93–108. ISBN 9780429489594. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429489594
73. Peppley BA, Amphlett JC, Kearns LM, Mann RF (1999) Methanol–steam reforming on Cu/
ZnO/Al 2 O 3 . Part 1: the reaction network. Appl Catal A Gen, 179:21–29
74. Gunter MM, Ressler T, Jentoft RE, Bems B (2001) Redox behavior of copper oxide/zinc
oxide catalysts in the steam reforming of methanol studied by in situ x-ray diffraction and
absorption spectroscopy. J Catal 203:133–149
75. Yao C-Z, Wang L-C, Liu Y-M, Wu G-S, Cao Y, Dai W-L, He H-Y, Fan K-N (2006) Effect of
preparation method on the hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming over binary
Cu/ZrO 2 catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 297:151–158
76. Chin Y-H, Dagle R, Hu J, Dohnalkova AC, Wang Y (2002) Steam reforming of methanol over
highly active Pd/ZnO catalyst. Catal Today 77:79–88
77. Heggen M, Penner S, Friedrich M, Dunin-Borkowski RE, Armbruster M (2016) Formation
of ZnO patches on ZnPd/ZnO during methanol steam reforming: a strong metal−support
interaction effect. J Phys Chem C 120:10460–10465
78. Huber GW, Iborra S, Corma A (2006) Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. Chem Rev 106:4044–4098
79. Vaidya PD, Rodrigues AD (2009) Glycerol reforming for hydrogen production: a review.
Chem Eng Technol 32:1463–1469
80. Velu S, Satoh N, Gopinath C, Suzuki K (2002) Oxidative reforming of bio-ethanol over
CuNiZnAl mixed oxide catalysts for hydrogen production. Catal Letters 82:145–152
81. Han SJ, Song JH, Yoo J, Park S, Kang KH, Song IK (2017) Sorption-enhanced hydrogen
production by steam reforming of ethanol over mesoporous Co/CaO-Al 2 O 3 xerogel catalysts:
effect of Ca/Al molar ratio. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:5886–5898
S. Bepari et al.
63. Taghizadeh M, Akhoundzadeh H, Rezayan A, Sadeghian M (2018) Excellent catalytic performance of 3D-mesoporous KIT-6 supported Cu and Ce nanoparticles in methanol steam
reforming. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:10926–10937
64. Lenarda M, Moretti E, Storaro L, Patrono P, Pinzari F, Rodriguez-Castellon E, JimenezLopez A, Busca G, Finocchio E, Montanari T, Frattini R (2006) Finely dispersed Pd-Zn catalyst supported on an organized mesoporous alumina for hydrogen production by methanol
steam reforming. Appl Catal A Gen 312:220–228
65. Deshmane VG, Owen SL, Abrokwah RY, Kuila D (2015) Mesoporous nanocrystalline TiO 2
supported metal (cu, co, Ni, Pd, Zn, and Sn) catalysts: effect of metal-support interactions on
steam reforming of methanol. J Mol Catal A Chem 408:202–213
66. Tajrishi OZ, Taghizadeh M, Kiadehi AD (2018) Methanol steam reforming in a microchannel reactor by Zn-, Ce- and Zr- modified mesoporous cu/SBA-15 nanocatalyst. Int J Hydrog
Energy 43:14103–14120
67. Zhao D, Sun J, Li Q, Stucky GD (2000) Morphological control of highly ordered mesoporous
silica SBA-15. Chem Mater 12:275–279
68. Araujo VD, Bellido JDA, Bernardi MIB, Assaf JM, Assaf EM (2012) CuO-CeO 2 catalysts
synthesized in one-step: characterization and PROX performance. Int J Hydrog Energy
37:5498–5507
69. Kleitz F, Berube F, Guillet-Nicolas R, Yang C-M, Thommes M (2010) Probing adsorption,
pore condensation, and hysteresis behavior of pure fluids in three-dimensional cubic mesoporous KIT-6 silica. J Phys Chem C 114:9344–9355
70. Wan H, Li X, Ji S, Huang B, Wang K, Li C (2007) Effect of Ni loading and Ce x Zr 1-x O 2
promoter on Ni based SBA-15 catalysts for steam reforming of methane. J Nat Gas Chem
16:139–147
71. Panpranot J, Goodwin JG Jr, Sayari A (2002) Synthesis and characteristics of MCM-41 supported CoRu catalysts. Catal Today 77:269–284
72. Abrokwah RY, Dade W, Owen SL, Deshmane V, Rahman M, Kuila D (2016) Effects of mesoporous supports and metals on steam reforming of alcohols [Chapter 6]. In: Nanda S, Sarangi
PK, Vo D-VN (eds) Fuel processing and energy utilization. Taylor and Francis, New York,
pp 93–108. ISBN 9780429489594. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429489594
73. Peppley BA, Amphlett JC, Kearns LM, Mann RF (1999) Methanol–steam reforming on Cu/
ZnO/Al 2 O 3 . Part 1: the reaction network. Appl Catal A Gen, 179:21–29
74. Gunter MM, Ressler T, Jentoft RE, Bems B (2001) Redox behavior of copper oxide/zinc
oxide catalysts in the steam reforming of methanol studied by in situ x-ray diffraction and
absorption spectroscopy. J Catal 203:133–149
75. Yao C-Z, Wang L-C, Liu Y-M, Wu G-S, Cao Y, Dai W-L, He H-Y, Fan K-N (2006) Effect of
preparation method on the hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming over binary
Cu/ZrO 2 catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 297:151–158
76. Chin Y-H, Dagle R, Hu J, Dohnalkova AC, Wang Y (2002) Steam reforming of methanol over
highly active Pd/ZnO catalyst. Catal Today 77:79–88
77. Heggen M, Penner S, Friedrich M, Dunin-Borkowski RE, Armbruster M (2016) Formation
of ZnO patches on ZnPd/ZnO during methanol steam reforming: a strong metal−support
interaction effect. J Phys Chem C 120:10460–10465
78. Huber GW, Iborra S, Corma A (2006) Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. Chem Rev 106:4044–4098
79. Vaidya PD, Rodrigues AD (2009) Glycerol reforming for hydrogen production: a review.
Chem Eng Technol 32:1463–1469
80. Velu S, Satoh N, Gopinath C, Suzuki K (2002) Oxidative reforming of bio-ethanol over
CuNiZnAl mixed oxide catalysts for hydrogen production. Catal Letters 82:145–152
81. Han SJ, Song JH, Yoo J, Park S, Kang KH, Song IK (2017) Sorption-enhanced hydrogen
production by steam reforming of ethanol over mesoporous Co/CaO-Al 2 O 3 xerogel catalysts:
effect of Ca/Al molar ratio. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:5886–5898
S. Bepari et al.