18 A Plausible Description of Continuum …
367
where w(k) is the weight, in this case 1, of the k-element and p the mean parameter,
−1.
In Figs. 18.49 and 18.50, we are considering honeycomb lattice that sounds as
one of the best results.
Case (i) Long beam
Also in the case of longer beam, we can try many combinations of the parameters tool
to fit the deflection of our beam, but it is useless: We need to connect the constitutive
parameters with the tool. If we increase the ratio length/width of our beam from
Fig. 18.49 Plate deformation
Fig. 18.50 Corresponding von Mises plot
367
where w(k) is the weight, in this case 1, of the k-element and p the mean parameter,
−1.
In Figs. 18.49 and 18.50, we are considering honeycomb lattice that sounds as
one of the best results.
Case (i) Long beam
Also in the case of longer beam, we can try many combinations of the parameters tool
to fit the deflection of our beam, but it is useless: We need to connect the constitutive
parameters with the tool. If we increase the ratio length/width of our beam from
Fig. 18.49 Plate deformation
Fig. 18.50 Corresponding von Mises plot