146
7 Device-Independent Quantum Cryptography
3. Pironio, S., Acín, A., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Massar, S., & Scarani, V. (2009). Deviceindependent quantum key distribution secure against collective attacks. New Journal of Physics,
11(4), 045021.
4. Masanes, L., Pironio, S., & Acín, A. (2011). Secure device-independent quantum key distribution with causally independent measurement devices. Nature Communications, 2(1), 238.
5. Vazirani, U., & Vidick, T. (2014). Fully device-independent quantum key distribution. Physical
Review Letters, 113, 140501.
6. Arnon-Friedman, R., Dupuis, F., Fawzi, O., Renner, R., & Vidick, T. (2018). Practical deviceindependent quantum cryptography via entropy accumulation. Nature Communications, 9(1),
459.
7. Scarani, V., & Gisin, N. (2001a). Quantum communication between n partners and Bell’s
inequalities. Physical Review Letters, 87, 117901.
8. Scarani, V., & Gisin, N. (2001b). Quantum key distribution between n partners: Optimal eavesdropping and Bell’s inequalities. Physical Review A, 65, 012311.
9. Ribeiro, J., Murta, G., & Wehner, S. (2019). Reply to “comment on ‘fully device-independent
conference key agreement”’. Physical Review A, 100, 026302.
10. Holz, T., Kampermann, H., & Bruß, D. (2019). A genuine multipartite bell inequality for
device-independent conference key agreement. arXiv:quant-ph/1910.11360.
11. Colbeck, R. (2007). Quantum and relativistic protocols for secure multi-party computation.
Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge. arXiv:quant-ph/0911.3814.
12. Pironio, S., Acín, A., Massar, S., de la Giroday, A. B., Matsukevich, D. N., Maunz, P., et al.
(2010). Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem. Nature, 464(7291), 1021–1024.
13. Colbeck, R., & Kent, A. (2011). Private randomness expansion with untrusted devices. Journal
of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(9), 095305.
14. Nieto-Silleras, O., Bamps, C., Silman, J., & Pironio, S. (2018). Device-independent randomness
generation from several bell estimators. New Journal of Physics, 20(2), 023049.
15. Pironio, S., & Massar, S. (2013). Security of practical private randomness generation. Physical
Review A, 87, 012336.
16. Fehr, S., Gelles, R., & Schaffner, C. (2013). Security and composability of randomness expansion from bell inequalities. Physical Review A, 87, 012335.
17. Bell, J. S. (1964). On the Einstein podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics Physique Fizika, 1, 195–
200.
18. Bell, J. S. (2004). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
19. Valdenebro, A. G. (2002). Assumptions underlying Bell’s inequalities. European Journal of
Physics, 23(5), 569–577.
20. Goldstein, S., Norsen, T., Tausk, D. V., & Zanghi, N. (2011). Bell’s theorem. Scholarpedia,
6(10), 8378. Revision #91049.
21. Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., & Wehner, S. (2014). Bell nonlocality.
Reviews of Modern Physics, 86, 419–478.
22. Horodecki, P., & Ramanathan, R. (2019). The relativistic causality versus no-signaling
paradigm for multi-party correlations. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1701.
23. Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969). Proposed experiment to test
local hidden-variable theories. Physical Review Letters, 23, 880–884.
24. Tóth, G., & Gühne, O. (2005). Entanglement detection in the stabilizer formalism. Physical
Review A, 72, 022340.
25. Holz, T., Miller, D., Kampermann, H., & Bruß, D. (2019). Comment on “fully deviceindependent conference key agreement”. Physical Review A, 100, 026301.
26. Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., & Roger, G. (1982). Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using
time-varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters, 49, 1804–1807.
27. Hensen, B., Bernien, H., Dréau, A. E., Reiserer, A., Kalb, N., Blok, M. S., Ruitenberg, J.,
Vermeulen, R. F. L., Schouten, R. N., Abellán, C., Amaya, W., Pruneri, V., Mitchell, M. W.,
Markham, M., Twitchen, D. J., Elkouss, D., Wehner, S., Taminiau, T. H., & Hanson, R. (2015).
Loophole-free bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature,
526(7575), 682–686.
7 Device-Independent Quantum Cryptography
3. Pironio, S., Acín, A., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Massar, S., & Scarani, V. (2009). Deviceindependent quantum key distribution secure against collective attacks. New Journal of Physics,
11(4), 045021.
4. Masanes, L., Pironio, S., & Acín, A. (2011). Secure device-independent quantum key distribution with causally independent measurement devices. Nature Communications, 2(1), 238.
5. Vazirani, U., & Vidick, T. (2014). Fully device-independent quantum key distribution. Physical
Review Letters, 113, 140501.
6. Arnon-Friedman, R., Dupuis, F., Fawzi, O., Renner, R., & Vidick, T. (2018). Practical deviceindependent quantum cryptography via entropy accumulation. Nature Communications, 9(1),
459.
7. Scarani, V., & Gisin, N. (2001a). Quantum communication between n partners and Bell’s
inequalities. Physical Review Letters, 87, 117901.
8. Scarani, V., & Gisin, N. (2001b). Quantum key distribution between n partners: Optimal eavesdropping and Bell’s inequalities. Physical Review A, 65, 012311.
9. Ribeiro, J., Murta, G., & Wehner, S. (2019). Reply to “comment on ‘fully device-independent
conference key agreement”’. Physical Review A, 100, 026302.
10. Holz, T., Kampermann, H., & Bruß, D. (2019). A genuine multipartite bell inequality for
device-independent conference key agreement. arXiv:quant-ph/1910.11360.
11. Colbeck, R. (2007). Quantum and relativistic protocols for secure multi-party computation.
Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge. arXiv:quant-ph/0911.3814.
12. Pironio, S., Acín, A., Massar, S., de la Giroday, A. B., Matsukevich, D. N., Maunz, P., et al.
(2010). Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem. Nature, 464(7291), 1021–1024.
13. Colbeck, R., & Kent, A. (2011). Private randomness expansion with untrusted devices. Journal
of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(9), 095305.
14. Nieto-Silleras, O., Bamps, C., Silman, J., & Pironio, S. (2018). Device-independent randomness
generation from several bell estimators. New Journal of Physics, 20(2), 023049.
15. Pironio, S., & Massar, S. (2013). Security of practical private randomness generation. Physical
Review A, 87, 012336.
16. Fehr, S., Gelles, R., & Schaffner, C. (2013). Security and composability of randomness expansion from bell inequalities. Physical Review A, 87, 012335.
17. Bell, J. S. (1964). On the Einstein podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics Physique Fizika, 1, 195–
200.
18. Bell, J. S. (2004). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
19. Valdenebro, A. G. (2002). Assumptions underlying Bell’s inequalities. European Journal of
Physics, 23(5), 569–577.
20. Goldstein, S., Norsen, T., Tausk, D. V., & Zanghi, N. (2011). Bell’s theorem. Scholarpedia,
6(10), 8378. Revision #91049.
21. Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., & Wehner, S. (2014). Bell nonlocality.
Reviews of Modern Physics, 86, 419–478.
22. Horodecki, P., & Ramanathan, R. (2019). The relativistic causality versus no-signaling
paradigm for multi-party correlations. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1701.
23. Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969). Proposed experiment to test
local hidden-variable theories. Physical Review Letters, 23, 880–884.
24. Tóth, G., & Gühne, O. (2005). Entanglement detection in the stabilizer formalism. Physical
Review A, 72, 022340.
25. Holz, T., Miller, D., Kampermann, H., & Bruß, D. (2019). Comment on “fully deviceindependent conference key agreement”. Physical Review A, 100, 026301.
26. Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., & Roger, G. (1982). Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using
time-varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters, 49, 1804–1807.
27. Hensen, B., Bernien, H., Dréau, A. E., Reiserer, A., Kalb, N., Blok, M. S., Ruitenberg, J.,
Vermeulen, R. F. L., Schouten, R. N., Abellán, C., Amaya, W., Pruneri, V., Mitchell, M. W.,
Markham, M., Twitchen, D. J., Elkouss, D., Wehner, S., Taminiau, T. H., & Hanson, R. (2015).
Loophole-free bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature,
526(7575), 682–686.