150
T. Krak
Fig. 5.2 Graphical illustration of ‘pulling back’ the expected value of a function f on X 0:2 , in a
probability tree on a binary state-space X = {a, b}. Top: the function f is entirely determined
by the situations of length 3, i.e. the expected value of the function in those situations is simply
the value of the function evaluated in that situation. Bottom: the result after ‘pulling back’ the
expectations by one step. The resulting conditional expectation is a function whose value is entirely
determined by the situations of length 2. The values are the weighted average of the expectations
in the child nodes, weighted by the local models p (·)
stated formally in the measure-theoretic context, where it is also easily stated for
continuous-time stochastic processes.
Theorem 5.1 Fix a time-dimension T ∈ {N 0 , R ≥0 }, and let {X t } t∈T be a stochastic
process on (Ω, F , P ). Choose any three ordered sequences s = s 1 , . . . , s n ; t =
t 1 , . . . , t m and u = u 1 , . . . , u in T, with n, m, , ∈ N such that s n < t 1 and t m < u 1 .
Then for any real-valued function f ∈ L (X n+m+ ) on X s , X t , X u , it holds that
E
f (X s , X t , X u )
X s
= E
E
f (X s , X t , X u )
X s , X t
X s
,
whenever P (X s ) and P (X s , X t ) are everywhere strictly positive.
In this result, the final constraint is required to ensure that the conditional expectations are all well-defined in the measure-theoretic sense. This point did not arise in
the discussion using probability trees, because there the local (conditional) models
are always properly defined by the model specification.
Précédent

- 154/568

Suivant