24
1 Introduction
55. H. Kunitomo, T. Sugimoto, Heterotic string field theory with cyclic L-infinity structure.
Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019(6), 063B02 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptz051. arXiv:
1902.02991
56. H. Kunitomo, T. Sugimoto, Type II superstring field theory with cyclic L-infinity structure,
March 2020. arXiv: 1911.04103.
57. A. Laddha, A. Sen, Sub-subleading soft graviton theorem in generic theories of quantum gravity. J. High Energy Phys. 2017(10), 065 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2017)065.
arXiv: 1706.00759
58. H. Luckock, I. Moss, The quantum geometry of random surfaces and spinning membranes.
Class. Quantum Gravity 6(12), 1993–2027 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/6/12/
025
59. C. Maccaferri, A. Merlano, Localization of effective actions in open superstring field theory.
J. High Energy Phys. 2018(3), 112 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2018)112. arXiv:
1801.07607
60. C. Maccaferri, A. Merlano, Localization of effective actions in open superstring field
theory: small Hilbert space. J. High Energy Phys. 1906, 101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/
JHEP06(2019)101. arXiv: 1905.04958
61. U. Marquard, M. Scholl, Conditions of the embedding space of P-branes from their
constraint algebras. Phys. Lett. B 209(4), 434–440 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/03702693(88)91169-0
62. U. Marquard, M. Scholl, Lorentz algebra and critical dimension for the bosonic membrane.
Phys. Lett. B 227(2), 227–233 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(89)80027-9
63. U. Marquard, R. Kaiser, M. Scholl, Lorentz algebra and critical dimension for the
supermembrane. Phys. Lett. B 227(2), 234–238 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/S03702693(89)80028-0
64. S.F. Moosavian, R. Pius, Hyperbolic geometry of superstring perturbation theory, March
2017. arXiv: 1703.10563
65. S.F. Moosavian, R. Pius, Hyperbolic geometry and closed bosonic string field theory I: the
string vertices via hyperbolic Riemann surfaces. J. High Energy Phys. 1908, 157 (2019).
arXiv: 1706.07366
66. S.F. Moosavian, R. Pius, Hyperbolic geometry and closed bosonic string field theory II: the
rules for evaluating the quantum BV master action. J. High Energy Phys. 1908, 177 (2019).
arXiv: 1708.04977
67. S.F. Moosavian, Y. Zhou, On the existence of heterotic-string and type-II-superstring field
theory vertices, Nov 2019. arXiv: 1911.04343
68. S.F. Moosavian, A. Sen, M. Verma, Superstring field theory with open and closed strings. J.
High Energy Phys. 2001, 183 (2020). arXiv:1907.10632
69. K. Ohmori, Y. Okawa, Open superstring field theory based on the supermoduli space. J.
High Energy Phys. 2018(4), 35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2018)035. arXiv:
1703.08214
70. Y. Okawa, B. Zwiebach, Heterotic string field theory. J. High Energy Phys. 2004(07), 042–
042 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2004/07/042. arXiv: hep-th/0406212
71. F. Paccanoni, P. Pasti, M. Tonin,
Some remarks on the consistency of quantum
supermembranes. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4(09), 807–814 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1142/
S0217732389000940
72. R. Pius, Quantum closed superstring field theory and hyperbolic geometry I: construction of
string vertices, Aug 2018. arXiv: 1808.09441
73. R. Pius, A. Sen, Cutkosky rules for superstring field theory. J. High Energy Phys. 2016(10),
24 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2016)024. arXiv: 1604.01783
74. R. Pius, A. Rudra, A. Sen, Mass renormalization in string theory: general states. J.
High Energy Phys. 2014(7), 62 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)062. arXiv:
1401.7014
75. R. Pius, A. Rudra, A. Sen, Mass renormalization in string theory: special states. J.
High Energy Phys. 2014(7), 58 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)058. arXiv:
1311.1257
1 Introduction
55. H. Kunitomo, T. Sugimoto, Heterotic string field theory with cyclic L-infinity structure.
Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019(6), 063B02 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptz051. arXiv:
1902.02991
56. H. Kunitomo, T. Sugimoto, Type II superstring field theory with cyclic L-infinity structure,
March 2020. arXiv: 1911.04103.
57. A. Laddha, A. Sen, Sub-subleading soft graviton theorem in generic theories of quantum gravity. J. High Energy Phys. 2017(10), 065 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2017)065.
arXiv: 1706.00759
58. H. Luckock, I. Moss, The quantum geometry of random surfaces and spinning membranes.
Class. Quantum Gravity 6(12), 1993–2027 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/6/12/
025
59. C. Maccaferri, A. Merlano, Localization of effective actions in open superstring field theory.
J. High Energy Phys. 2018(3), 112 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2018)112. arXiv:
1801.07607
60. C. Maccaferri, A. Merlano, Localization of effective actions in open superstring field
theory: small Hilbert space. J. High Energy Phys. 1906, 101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/
JHEP06(2019)101. arXiv: 1905.04958
61. U. Marquard, M. Scholl, Conditions of the embedding space of P-branes from their
constraint algebras. Phys. Lett. B 209(4), 434–440 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/03702693(88)91169-0
62. U. Marquard, M. Scholl, Lorentz algebra and critical dimension for the bosonic membrane.
Phys. Lett. B 227(2), 227–233 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(89)80027-9
63. U. Marquard, R. Kaiser, M. Scholl, Lorentz algebra and critical dimension for the
supermembrane. Phys. Lett. B 227(2), 234–238 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/S03702693(89)80028-0
64. S.F. Moosavian, R. Pius, Hyperbolic geometry of superstring perturbation theory, March
2017. arXiv: 1703.10563
65. S.F. Moosavian, R. Pius, Hyperbolic geometry and closed bosonic string field theory I: the
string vertices via hyperbolic Riemann surfaces. J. High Energy Phys. 1908, 157 (2019).
arXiv: 1706.07366
66. S.F. Moosavian, R. Pius, Hyperbolic geometry and closed bosonic string field theory II: the
rules for evaluating the quantum BV master action. J. High Energy Phys. 1908, 177 (2019).
arXiv: 1708.04977
67. S.F. Moosavian, Y. Zhou, On the existence of heterotic-string and type-II-superstring field
theory vertices, Nov 2019. arXiv: 1911.04343
68. S.F. Moosavian, A. Sen, M. Verma, Superstring field theory with open and closed strings. J.
High Energy Phys. 2001, 183 (2020). arXiv:1907.10632
69. K. Ohmori, Y. Okawa, Open superstring field theory based on the supermoduli space. J.
High Energy Phys. 2018(4), 35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2018)035. arXiv:
1703.08214
70. Y. Okawa, B. Zwiebach, Heterotic string field theory. J. High Energy Phys. 2004(07), 042–
042 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2004/07/042. arXiv: hep-th/0406212
71. F. Paccanoni, P. Pasti, M. Tonin,
Some remarks on the consistency of quantum
supermembranes. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4(09), 807–814 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1142/
S0217732389000940
72. R. Pius, Quantum closed superstring field theory and hyperbolic geometry I: construction of
string vertices, Aug 2018. arXiv: 1808.09441
73. R. Pius, A. Sen, Cutkosky rules for superstring field theory. J. High Energy Phys. 2016(10),
24 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2016)024. arXiv: 1604.01783
74. R. Pius, A. Rudra, A. Sen, Mass renormalization in string theory: general states. J.
High Energy Phys. 2014(7), 62 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)062. arXiv:
1401.7014
75. R. Pius, A. Rudra, A. Sen, Mass renormalization in string theory: special states. J.
High Energy Phys. 2014(7), 58 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)058. arXiv:
1311.1257