292
J.-F. Lemaître et al.
fragments drives the evolution of the fissioning system between the saddle and
scission points. The fission yields calculation has been significantly improved, in
particular by predicting relatively wide peaks, as observed experimentally. Our
systematic study of the fission mode for some 2000 heavy nuclei with 78 ≤ Z ≤ 110
shows that the fission mode is mainly determined by the neutron number.
References
1. M. Arnould et al., Phys. Rep. 450, 97–213 (2007)
2. S. Goriely et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 242502 (2013)
3. O. Just et al., MNRAS 448, 541–567 (2015)
4. S. Goriely, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 22 (2015)
5. S. Goriely, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 172 (2015)
6. S. Hilaire et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 336 (2016)
7. J.F. Lemaître et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 034617 (2015)
8. J.F. Lemaître et al., Phys. Rev. C 98, 024623 (2018)
9. S. Goriely et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 064312 (2007)
10. P. Möller et al., Phys. Rev. C 79, 064304 (2009)
11. R. Capote et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 110, 3107–3214 (2009)
12. N.E. Holden et al., Pure Appl. Chem. 72, 1525–1562 (2000)
13. E.W. Dijkstra, Numer. Math. 1, 269–271 (1959)
14. J.F. Lemaître et al., Phys. Rev. C 99, 034612 (2019)
15. S. Goriely et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, 061302 (2013)
16. C. Romano et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 014607 (2010)
17. C. Tsuchiya et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 37, 941–948 (2000)
18. S. Zeynalov et al., J. Korean Phys. Soc. 59, 1396–1399 (2011)
19. A.N. Andreyev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252502 (2010)
20. S. Panebianco et al., Phys. Rev. C 86, 064601 (2012)
21. K.H. Schmidt et al., Nucl. Phys. A 665, 221–267 (2000)
J.-F. Lemaître et al.
fragments drives the evolution of the fissioning system between the saddle and
scission points. The fission yields calculation has been significantly improved, in
particular by predicting relatively wide peaks, as observed experimentally. Our
systematic study of the fission mode for some 2000 heavy nuclei with 78 ≤ Z ≤ 110
shows that the fission mode is mainly determined by the neutron number.
References
1. M. Arnould et al., Phys. Rep. 450, 97–213 (2007)
2. S. Goriely et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 242502 (2013)
3. O. Just et al., MNRAS 448, 541–567 (2015)
4. S. Goriely, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 22 (2015)
5. S. Goriely, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 172 (2015)
6. S. Hilaire et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 336 (2016)
7. J.F. Lemaître et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 034617 (2015)
8. J.F. Lemaître et al., Phys. Rev. C 98, 024623 (2018)
9. S. Goriely et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 064312 (2007)
10. P. Möller et al., Phys. Rev. C 79, 064304 (2009)
11. R. Capote et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 110, 3107–3214 (2009)
12. N.E. Holden et al., Pure Appl. Chem. 72, 1525–1562 (2000)
13. E.W. Dijkstra, Numer. Math. 1, 269–271 (1959)
14. J.F. Lemaître et al., Phys. Rev. C 99, 034612 (2019)
15. S. Goriely et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, 061302 (2013)
16. C. Romano et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 014607 (2010)
17. C. Tsuchiya et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 37, 941–948 (2000)
18. S. Zeynalov et al., J. Korean Phys. Soc. 59, 1396–1399 (2011)
19. A.N. Andreyev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252502 (2010)
20. S. Panebianco et al., Phys. Rev. C 86, 064601 (2012)
21. K.H. Schmidt et al., Nucl. Phys. A 665, 221–267 (2000)