270
W. Younes
improves, but experiments must guide and constrain the theory developments.
In particular, theory will greatly benefit from multi-parameter experiments where
many fission observables are measured simultaneously on an event-by-event basis.
This type of comprehensive measurements can be used to reconstruct the state
of the parent nucleus at scission, which is where many theoretical calculations of
fission have to stop. Experiments that directly probe pre-scission dynamics are also
extremely useful in constraining theory. These types of experiments include the
measurement of pre-scission particles, fission time scales, and of exotic processes
such as muon-induced fission [114].
References
1. J. Chadwick, Nature 129, 312 (1932)
2. G. Herrmann, Nucl. Phys. A502, 141 (1989)
3. J.M. Pearson, Phys. Today 68, 40 (2015)
4. J.L. Spradley, Phys. Teacher 27, 656 (1989)
5. I. Noddack, Z. Angew Chem. 47, 653 (1934)
6. K. Starke, J. Chem. Ed. 56, 771 (1979)
7. O. Hahn, F. Strassmann, Naturwissenschaften 27, 11 (1939)
8. L. Meitner, O. Frisch, Nature 143, 239 (1939)
9. N. Bohr, J.A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 56, 426 (1939)
10. G.F. Bertsch, Nucl. Phys. A574, 169 (1994)
11. H.J. Krappe, K. Pomorski, Theory of Nuclear Fission: a Textbook (Springer, New York, 2012)
12. D. Filges, F. Goldenbaum, Handbook of Spallation Research (Wiley, Weinheim, 2009)
13. G.J. Russell, ICANS-XI International Collaboration on Advanced Neutron Sources, Tsukuba
(1990), p. 291
14. R. Yanez, W. Loveland, J. S. Barrett, L. Yao, B.B. Back, S. Zhu, T.L. Khoo, Phys. Rev. C 88,
014606 (2013)
15. B.B. Back, H. Esbensen, C.L. Jiang, K.E. Rehm, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 317 (2014)
16. G.N. Flerov, K.A. Petrzhak, J. Phys. U.S.S.R. 3, 275 (1940)
17. G. Scharff-Goldhaber, G.S. Klaiber, Phys. Rev. 70, 229 (1946)
18. A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics (Dover, Mineola, 1999)
19. A. Baran, Phys. Lett. B 76, 8 (1978)
20. R. Rodríguez-Guzmán, L.M. Robledo, Phys. Rev. C 89, 054310 (2014)
21. J.E. Escher, J.T. Burke, F.S. Dietrich, N.D. Scielzo, I.J. Thompson, W. Younes, Rev. Mod.
Phys. 84, 353 (2012)
22. J.W. Negele, S.E. Koonin, P. Möller, J.R. Nix, A.J. Sierk, Phys. Rev. C 17, 1098 (1978)
23. J.F. Berger, M. Girod, D. Gogny, Nucl. Phys. A502, 85 (1989)
24. A. Bulgac, P. Magierski, K.J. Roche, I. Stetcu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 122504 (2016)
25. H.W. Wilschut, V.L. Kravchuk, Nucl. Phys. A734, 156 (2004)
26. M. Morjean, J.L. Charvet, M. Chevallier, C. Cohen, D. Dauvergne, R. Dayras, A. Drouart, J.D.
Frankland, D. Jacquet, R. Kirsch, M. Laget, P. Lautesse, A. L’Hoir, A. Marchix, L. Nalpas, M.
Parlog, C. Ray, C. Schmitt, C. Stodel, L. Tassangot, C. Volant, Eur. Phys. J. D 45, 27 (2007)
27. D.J. Hofman, B.B. Back, I. Diószegi, C.P. Montaya, S. Schadmand, R. Varma, P. Paul, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 72, 470 (1994)
28. D.J. Hinde, D. Hilscher, H. Rossner, Nucl. Phys. A538, 243 (1992)
29. E.A.C. Crouch, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 19, 417 (1977)
30. P. Talou, T. Kawano, I. Stetcu, J.P. Lestone, E. McKigney, M.B. Chadwick, Phys. Rev. C 94,
064613 (2016)
Précédent

- 257/312

Suivant