Toke, D. and Lauber, V. (2007) ‘Anglo-Saxon and German approaches to neoliberalism
and environmental policy: The case of financing renewable energy’, Geoforum, vol 38,
no 4, pp677–687.
Tol, R. S. J. (2007) ‘Europe’s long_term climate target: A critical evaluation’, Energy Policy,
vol 35, pp424–432.
Trainer, T. (1996) Towards a Sustainable Economy: The Need for Fundamental Change,
Jon Carpenter, Oxford.
UN (United Nations) (2012) The Future We Want, UN, Geneva, www.uncsd2012.org/
content/documents/727The%20Future%20We%20Want%2019%20June%201230pm.pdf,
accessed 2 July 2012.
UN (2013) Statement on Planetary Boundaries, United Nations, Bonn.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (1992) Agenda 21, www.unep.org/
Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=52, accessed 14 February 2014.
UNEP (2011) Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty
Eradication, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, www.unep.org/green
economy, accessed 12 July 2014.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) (1992) United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change, https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/
background_publications_htmlpdf/application/pdf/conveng.pdf, accessed 4 May 2014.
Unmüßig, B., Sachs, W. and Fatheuer, T. (2012) ‘Critique of the green ecology: Toward
social and environmental equity’, Ecology Series, No. 22. Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Berlin.
Unruh, G. C. (2000) ‘Understanding carbon lock-in’, Energy Policy, vol 28, no 12,
pp817–830.
US Congress (1966) Public Law, 89–487.
US Congress (1976) Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law, 94–409.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (undated) ‘Step 2 – dose-response
assessment’, www.epa.gov/risk_assessment/dose-response.htm, accessed 11 June 2014.
US FDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) (2013) Code of Federal Regulations,
revised 1 April 2013, title 21, vol 3, 21CFR180.37, www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/
cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=180.37, accessed 11 June 2014.
US NAS (United States National Academy of Sciences) (1978) Saccharin: A Technical Assess -
ment of Risks and Benefits: Part 1, National Academy of Sciences, Committee for a Study
of Saccharin and Food Safety Policy, Washington, DC.
US NAS and RSL (Royal Society of London) (2014) Climate Change: Evidence and Causes,
27 February, US National Academy of Sciences and Royal Society of London, http://
royalsociety.org/policy/projects/climate-evidence-causes/, accessed 11 June 2014.
USA (2004) European Communities – Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech
Products (WT/DS291, 292, and 293), First Submission of the United States to the World
Trade Organization’s Dispute Panel, April 21, www.worldtradelaw.net/reports/
wtopanelsfull/ec-biotech%28panel%29%28full%29.pdf, accessed 11 June 2014.
USDOT (United States Department of Transportation) (2009) Cash for Clunkers Wraps
up with Nearly 700,000 Car Sales and Increased Fuel Efficiency, US Government report,
DOT 133–09, www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/administration/pdf/CARS_stats_DOT13309.pdf,
accessed 24 June 2014.
Utting, P. (forthcoming, 2015) Social and Solidarity Economy: Beyond the Fringe? Zed Books,
London.
van der Pijl, K. (1998) Transnational Classes and International Relations, Routledge, London.
van der Sluijs, J., van Eijndhoven, J., Shackley, S. and Wynne, B. (1998) ‘Anchoring devices
in science for policy: The case of consensus around the climate sensitivity’, Social Studies
of Science, vol 28, no 2, pp291–323.
References 211
Précédent

- 230/239

Suivant