260
T. Sreedhar et al.
Fig. 4 Frequency response—carbon fiber—the original model
Fig. 5 Frequency response—Rockwool—Original model
Frequency is compared with two different materials in Fig. 9. In this, the rockwool
is the material is getting less frequency compared to carbon fiber in all modes.
Frequency (Hz) is compared with two different materials for the modified model in
Fig. 10. In this, the rockwool is the material which is getting less frequency compared
to carbon fiber in all modes, and if we compare to the original model, the frequency
is less for the modified muffler.
T. Sreedhar et al.
Fig. 4 Frequency response—carbon fiber—the original model
Fig. 5 Frequency response—Rockwool—Original model
Frequency is compared with two different materials in Fig. 9. In this, the rockwool
is the material is getting less frequency compared to carbon fiber in all modes.
Frequency (Hz) is compared with two different materials for the modified model in
Fig. 10. In this, the rockwool is the material which is getting less frequency compared
to carbon fiber in all modes, and if we compare to the original model, the frequency
is less for the modified muffler.