16 Molecular Modeling Method Applications …
329
molecular modeling protocols or guidelines were available for target-based methods
to date. The lack of such protocols or guidelines may lead to inconsistent use of
such methods [117]. Thus, in order to ensure the molecular modeling processes are
performed and evaluated in a consistent, reproducible, and well-documented manner,
a molecular modeling protocol or guideline should be issued as quickly as possible.
Acknowledgements The study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China
(No. 21507038, No. 41671489, No. 21507061) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
(No. BK20150771).
References
1. Kwiatkowski CF, Bolden AL, Liroff RA, Rochester JR, Vandenbergh JG (2016) Twenty-five
years of endocrine disruption science: remembering Theo Colborn. Environ Health Perspect
124(9):A151–A154
2. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Bourguignon JP, Giudice LC, Hauser R, Prins GS, Soto AM, Zoeller
RT, Gore AC (2009) Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an endocrine society scientific statement. Endocr Rev 30(4):293–342
3. Soto AM, Sonnenschein C (2010) Environmental causes of cancer: endocrine disruptors as
carcinogens. Nat Rev Endocrinol 6(7):363–370
4. United Nations Environment Programme/World Health Organization (2013) State of the
science of endocrine disrupting chemicals. United Nations Environment Programme/World
Health Organization (UNEP/WHO), Geneva
5. Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, Flaws JA, Nadal A, Prins GS, Toppari J, Zoeller RT
(2015) EDC-2: the endocrine society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting
chemicals. Endocr Rev 36(6):E1–E150
6. Matthiessen P, Wheeler JR, Weltje L (2018) A review of the evidence for endocrine disrupting
effects of current-use chemicals on wildlife populations. Crit Rev Toxicol 48(3):195–216
7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Addendum endocrine disruptor screening and
testing advisory committee. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington
8. Commission of the European Communities (1999) Communication from the commission
to the council and the european parliament, community strategy for endocrine disrupters, a
range of substances suspected of interfering with the hormone systems of humans and wildlife.
Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
9. The State Council of Pepole’s Republic of China (2015) Notice of the state council on issuing
the action plan for prevention and control of water pollution. GF[2015] No. 17. The State
Council of Pepole’s Republic of China, Beijing
10. Ministry of the Environment of Japan (1998) Environment agency’s basic policy on environmental endocrine disruptors, strategic programs on environmental endocrine disruptors
SPEED’ 98. Environmental Policy Bureau, Tokyo
11. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2012) Guidance document on
standardised test guidelines for evaluating chemicals for endocrine disruption. Technical
report for OECD environment, health and safety publications series on testing and assessment
no. 150. OECD, Paris
12. Damstra T, Barlow S, Bergman A, Kavlock R, Van Der Kraak G (2002) Global assessment
of the state-of-the-science of endocrine disruptors. World Healthe Organization, Geneva
13. International Conference on Chemicals Management Third Session (2012) Report of the international conference on chemicals management on the work of its third session. International
Conference on Chemicals Management Third Session, Nairobi
329
molecular modeling protocols or guidelines were available for target-based methods
to date. The lack of such protocols or guidelines may lead to inconsistent use of
such methods [117]. Thus, in order to ensure the molecular modeling processes are
performed and evaluated in a consistent, reproducible, and well-documented manner,
a molecular modeling protocol or guideline should be issued as quickly as possible.
Acknowledgements The study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China
(No. 21507038, No. 41671489, No. 21507061) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
(No. BK20150771).
References
1. Kwiatkowski CF, Bolden AL, Liroff RA, Rochester JR, Vandenbergh JG (2016) Twenty-five
years of endocrine disruption science: remembering Theo Colborn. Environ Health Perspect
124(9):A151–A154
2. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Bourguignon JP, Giudice LC, Hauser R, Prins GS, Soto AM, Zoeller
RT, Gore AC (2009) Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an endocrine society scientific statement. Endocr Rev 30(4):293–342
3. Soto AM, Sonnenschein C (2010) Environmental causes of cancer: endocrine disruptors as
carcinogens. Nat Rev Endocrinol 6(7):363–370
4. United Nations Environment Programme/World Health Organization (2013) State of the
science of endocrine disrupting chemicals. United Nations Environment Programme/World
Health Organization (UNEP/WHO), Geneva
5. Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, Flaws JA, Nadal A, Prins GS, Toppari J, Zoeller RT
(2015) EDC-2: the endocrine society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting
chemicals. Endocr Rev 36(6):E1–E150
6. Matthiessen P, Wheeler JR, Weltje L (2018) A review of the evidence for endocrine disrupting
effects of current-use chemicals on wildlife populations. Crit Rev Toxicol 48(3):195–216
7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Addendum endocrine disruptor screening and
testing advisory committee. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington
8. Commission of the European Communities (1999) Communication from the commission
to the council and the european parliament, community strategy for endocrine disrupters, a
range of substances suspected of interfering with the hormone systems of humans and wildlife.
Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
9. The State Council of Pepole’s Republic of China (2015) Notice of the state council on issuing
the action plan for prevention and control of water pollution. GF[2015] No. 17. The State
Council of Pepole’s Republic of China, Beijing
10. Ministry of the Environment of Japan (1998) Environment agency’s basic policy on environmental endocrine disruptors, strategic programs on environmental endocrine disruptors
SPEED’ 98. Environmental Policy Bureau, Tokyo
11. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2012) Guidance document on
standardised test guidelines for evaluating chemicals for endocrine disruption. Technical
report for OECD environment, health and safety publications series on testing and assessment
no. 150. OECD, Paris
12. Damstra T, Barlow S, Bergman A, Kavlock R, Van Der Kraak G (2002) Global assessment
of the state-of-the-science of endocrine disruptors. World Healthe Organization, Geneva
13. International Conference on Chemicals Management Third Session (2012) Report of the international conference on chemicals management on the work of its third session. International
Conference on Chemicals Management Third Session, Nairobi