52
R. S. Lebelo and O. D. Makinde
Equations (5.3) and (5.4) now have the following forms (Eq. (5.6)):
∂θ
∂t
=
∂
2
θ
∂r 2 +
1
r
∂θ
∂r
+ α(1 + εθ)
m e
[θ/(1+εθ)]
+ αω(1 + εθ)
m e
[θ/(1+εθ)]
− ϕθ.
(5.6)
The initial and boundary conditions are shown in Eq. (5.7):
θ (r, 0) = θ 0 ;
∂θ
∂r
(0, t) = 0; θ (1, t) = 0.
(5.7)
Here θ and θ 0 are the respective dimensionless temperature and initial temperature.
The dimensionless parameters α, ε, r and are Frank-Kamenetskii (reaction rate),
activation energy, radial distance, and activation energy ratio, respectively. Lastly,
the dimensionless parameters for two-step reaction and heat loss are represented by
ω and ϕ.
5.2.1 Numerical Approach
The numerical solution for the governing equation using the semi-implicit FDM
followed the following route.
θ
N +1
− θ
N
t
=
∂
2
∂r 2 θ
N +τ
+
1
r
∂
∂r
θ
N
+ α
(1 + εθ)
m e
[θ/(1+εθ)]
N
+ αω
e
[εθ/(1+εθ)]
N − ϕθ
N
(5.8)
The τ is an arbitrary number such that 0 ≤ τ ≤ 1 and τ = 1 for the convenience
of using larger time steps. Rearranging Eq. (5.8), multiplying through by t and
taking γ =
t
r 2 yielded the expression for θ
N +τ as follows:
−τ γ θ
N +1
j+1 + (1 + 2τ γ )θ
N +1
j
− τ γ θ
N +1
j−1 = −γ (1 − τ )θ
N
j+1 +
1 − 2γ (1 − τ ) − ϕ
θ
N
j
− γ (1 − τ )θ
N
j−1 +
1
2r
γ
θ
N
j+1 − θ
N
j−1
+ ααt
(1 + εθ)
m e
[θ/(1+εθ)] + ωe
[θ/(1+εθ)]
N
(5.9)
A tri-diagonal matrix system was derived from Eq. (5.9) and Maple software was
used to solve the system.
R. S. Lebelo and O. D. Makinde
Equations (5.3) and (5.4) now have the following forms (Eq. (5.6)):
∂θ
∂t
=
∂
2
θ
∂r 2 +
1
r
∂θ
∂r
+ α(1 + εθ)
m e
[θ/(1+εθ)]
+ αω(1 + εθ)
m e
[θ/(1+εθ)]
− ϕθ.
(5.6)
The initial and boundary conditions are shown in Eq. (5.7):
θ (r, 0) = θ 0 ;
∂θ
∂r
(0, t) = 0; θ (1, t) = 0.
(5.7)
Here θ and θ 0 are the respective dimensionless temperature and initial temperature.
The dimensionless parameters α, ε, r and are Frank-Kamenetskii (reaction rate),
activation energy, radial distance, and activation energy ratio, respectively. Lastly,
the dimensionless parameters for two-step reaction and heat loss are represented by
ω and ϕ.
5.2.1 Numerical Approach
The numerical solution for the governing equation using the semi-implicit FDM
followed the following route.
θ
N +1
− θ
N
t
=
∂
2
∂r 2 θ
N +τ
+
1
r
∂
∂r
θ
N
+ α
(1 + εθ)
m e
[θ/(1+εθ)]
N
+ αω
e
[εθ/(1+εθ)]
N − ϕθ
N
(5.8)
The τ is an arbitrary number such that 0 ≤ τ ≤ 1 and τ = 1 for the convenience
of using larger time steps. Rearranging Eq. (5.8), multiplying through by t and
taking γ =
t
r 2 yielded the expression for θ
N +τ as follows:
−τ γ θ
N +1
j+1 + (1 + 2τ γ )θ
N +1
j
− τ γ θ
N +1
j−1 = −γ (1 − τ )θ
N
j+1 +
1 − 2γ (1 − τ ) − ϕ
θ
N
j
− γ (1 − τ )θ
N
j−1 +
1
2r
γ
θ
N
j+1 − θ
N
j−1
+ ααt
(1 + εθ)
m e
[θ/(1+εθ)] + ωe
[θ/(1+εθ)]
N
(5.9)
A tri-diagonal matrix system was derived from Eq. (5.9) and Maple software was
used to solve the system.
