72
Table 4.2 Future research directions
Focus
Areas of focus
Guiding theories
Rationale
Consumer
privacy
perceptions
• Examining the
Antecedents to privacy
concern across
differing cloud
applications.
• Unravelling the
outcomes of privacy
concern
in different contexts
including adoption,
continuance and
disclosure behaviours.
• Further unravelling the
trade-offs between
perceived benefits and
risks in different cloud
domains.
• Examining the role of
important privacyrelated
constructs including
trust and risk.
• Privacy calculus
theory
• Social contract
theory
• Protection
Motivation theory
Much of the privacy
literature in other
contexts follows the
APCO model
developed by Smith
et al. (2011) to
explore the
antecedents, privacy
concerns and
outcomes in a given
context. Little is
known about the
important drivers of
concern, dimensions
of concern or
outcomes in the
cloud context.
Effectiveness
of
institutional
assurances
• Developing privacy
labels and just-in-time
interventions for
different cloud
applications and
customers e.g. end
users and business
decision makers.
• Examining the
influence of these
assurances on potential
consumers’ perceptions
of privacy and trust.
• Examining the
influence of these
assurances on existing
customers perceptions
and willingness to
continue use.
• Communication
privacy management
theory
• Procedural fairness
theory
The potential of
institutional
assurances to
influence consumer
perceptions and
behaviours is
documented in other
contexts. There is a
need to unravel their
effectiveness in the
cloud context given
the breadth of
applications and
technologies relying
on the cloud to some
degree to deliver
services.
(continued)
G. FOX
Table 4.2 Future research directions
Focus
Areas of focus
Guiding theories
Rationale
Consumer
privacy
perceptions
• Examining the
Antecedents to privacy
concern across
differing cloud
applications.
• Unravelling the
outcomes of privacy
concern
in different contexts
including adoption,
continuance and
disclosure behaviours.
• Further unravelling the
trade-offs between
perceived benefits and
risks in different cloud
domains.
• Examining the role of
important privacyrelated
constructs including
trust and risk.
• Privacy calculus
theory
• Social contract
theory
• Protection
Motivation theory
Much of the privacy
literature in other
contexts follows the
APCO model
developed by Smith
et al. (2011) to
explore the
antecedents, privacy
concerns and
outcomes in a given
context. Little is
known about the
important drivers of
concern, dimensions
of concern or
outcomes in the
cloud context.
Effectiveness
of
institutional
assurances
• Developing privacy
labels and just-in-time
interventions for
different cloud
applications and
customers e.g. end
users and business
decision makers.
• Examining the
influence of these
assurances on potential
consumers’ perceptions
of privacy and trust.
• Examining the
influence of these
assurances on existing
customers perceptions
and willingness to
continue use.
• Communication
privacy management
theory
• Procedural fairness
theory
The potential of
institutional
assurances to
influence consumer
perceptions and
behaviours is
documented in other
contexts. There is a
need to unravel their
effectiveness in the
cloud context given
the breadth of
applications and
technologies relying
on the cloud to some
degree to deliver
services.
(continued)
G. FOX
