93
dimensions, adapted from the Greenaway et al. (2015) CIPO framework,
extended to include details for the Philanthropic dimension.
A CSP may demonstrate a combination of both control-based behaviors and justice-based behaviors in varying levels. We therefore position
control and justice as two continua, where four privacy orientations
emerge, namely; ‘low-justice, low-control’ orientations (we call CSPs in
this orientation ‘Compliers’); ‘low-justice, high-control’ (we call CSPs in
this orientation ‘Integrators’); ‘high-justice, high-control’ (we call CSPs
in this orientation ‘Citizens’); and ‘high-justice, low-control’ (we call
CSPs in this orientation ‘Warriors’). We summarize our privacy orientation framework below in Fig. 5.1.
5.4.1.1 Compliers
Complier CSPs focus on privacy risk mitigation. CSPs in this orientation
demonstrate privacy behaviors that measure low on justice and low on
control. This orientation sets compliance as the goal, with privacy governance assigned to functional management. Their privacy policies and
Low-Justice
Low-Control
High-Justice
High-Control
Low-Justice:
High-Control
Orientations
High-Justice:
High-Control
Orientations
Low-Justice:
Low-Control
Orientations
High-Justice:
Low-Control
Orientations
Complier
CSPs
Integrator
CSPs
Warrior
CSPs
Citizen
CSPs
Fig. 5.1 Privacy orientations framework
5 JUSTICE VS CONTROL IN CLOUD COMPUTING: A CONCEPTUAL…