154
M. Almuhisen et al.
Table 15.3 Complete ranking of the selected public private partnership contract
Ranking
Water
Positive
outranking flow
Negative
outranking flow
Net flow
1
Design–build–finance
0.0738
0.0641
0.0097
2
Operation and maintenance
0.0813
0.0744
0.0068
3
Build–own–operate–transfer
0.0809
0.0807
0.0002
4
Build–operate–transfer
0.0716
0.0749
−0.0032
5
Design–build
0.0760
0.0811
−0.0051
6
Build–own–operate
0.0750
0.0835
−0.0085
Fig. 15.1 PROMETHEE evaluation result of the selected PPPs
References
Argyris G, Kagiannas D (2003) The role of build operate transfer in promoting. National Technical
University of Athens, Greece
Arndt H (1999) Is build-own-operate-transfer a solution to local government’s infrastructure funding
problems? Victoria. The University of Melbourne, Australia
Aziz A (2007) Successful delivery of Public-Private Partnerships for infrastructure development. J
Constr 133:918–931
Brans JP, Vincle P (1985) A preference ranking organization method. Manag Sci 31(6):647–656
Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE
method. Eur J Oper Res 24:228–238
British Highways Agency (1997) Value in roads. HIAG J02–7650. Stationary Office, London
Chou WC, Lin WT, Lin CY (2007) Application of fuzzy theory and PROMETHEE technique to
evaluate suitable eco-technology method: a case study in Shismen reservoir watershed. Ecol Eng
31:269–280
Confoy B, Love D, Wood M, Picken H (1999) Build-own-operate—the procurement of correctional
services in profitable partnering in construction procurement, London, CIB W92 and CIB TG 23
Joint Symposium
Précédent

- 154/206

Suivant