14 The Most Common Factors Effecting Ground Water Quality
139
Michaels S, Kenney DS (2000) State approaches to watershed management: Transferring lessons
between the Northeast and Southwest. In: Proceedings of the watershed management and
operations management conferences. USA
Min H (1992) Selection of software: the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag
22(1)
Mukherji A, Shah T (2005) Groundwater socio-ecology and governance: a review of institutions
and policies in selected countries. Hydr J 13:328–345
Ostrom E, Burger J, Field CB, Norgaard RB, Policansky D (1999) Revisiting the commons: local
lessons. Global Chall 284:278–282
Pakianathan R (2018) Study measures arsenic contamination in wells. The Dartmouth, UK
Patterson L, Doyle M, Monsma D (2017) The future of groundwater: a report from the 2017 Aspen
Nicholas water forum. The Aspen Institute, USA
Prakash O, Datta B (2014) Characterization of groundwater pollution sources with unknown release
time history. J Water Resour 6:337–350
Saaty TL (June 2008) Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making: why
pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors—
the analytic hierarchy/network process (PDF). Review of the Royal Academy of Exact,
Physical and Natural Sciences, Series A: Mathematics (RACSAM). 102(2): 251–318. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.455.3274. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03191825. Retrieved 2008-12-22
Saaty TL, Peniwati K (2008) Group decision making: drawing out and reconciling differences.
RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. ISBN 978-1-888603-08-8
Saracoglu BO (2013) Selecting industrial investment locations in master plans of countries. Eur J
Industr Eng 7(4): 416–441. https://doi.org/10.1504/ejie.2013.055016
Schlager E (2007) In the agricultural groundwater revolution: opportunities and threats to
development. Wallingford, UK
Sugg ZP, Varady RG, Gerlak AK, de Grenade R (2015) Transboundary groundwater governance in
the guarani aquifer system: reflections from a survey of global and regional experts. J Water Int
40:377–400
Sugg ZP, Ziaja S, Schlager EC (2016) Conjunctive groundwater management to socio-ecological
disturbances: a comparison of 4 western U.S States. Texas Water J 7:1–24
USA: Monterey Herald
USA: Sandra Baker
Varady RG, Weert F, Megdal SB, Gerlak A, Iskandar CA, House-Peters L (2010) Groundwater
governance: a global framework for country action. GEF, USA
Varady RG, Zuniga-Teran AA, Gerlak AK, Megdal SB (2016) Modes and approaches of groundwater governance: a survey of lessons learned from selected cases across the globe. J Water
(Switzerland) 8(10):417
Wade R (1987) The management of common-property resources: collective action as an alternative
to privitisation or state regulation. Camb J Econ 11:95–106
Yang J, Lee H (1997) An AHP decision model for facility location selection. Facilities 15(9):241–
254
139
Michaels S, Kenney DS (2000) State approaches to watershed management: Transferring lessons
between the Northeast and Southwest. In: Proceedings of the watershed management and
operations management conferences. USA
Min H (1992) Selection of software: the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag
22(1)
Mukherji A, Shah T (2005) Groundwater socio-ecology and governance: a review of institutions
and policies in selected countries. Hydr J 13:328–345
Ostrom E, Burger J, Field CB, Norgaard RB, Policansky D (1999) Revisiting the commons: local
lessons. Global Chall 284:278–282
Pakianathan R (2018) Study measures arsenic contamination in wells. The Dartmouth, UK
Patterson L, Doyle M, Monsma D (2017) The future of groundwater: a report from the 2017 Aspen
Nicholas water forum. The Aspen Institute, USA
Prakash O, Datta B (2014) Characterization of groundwater pollution sources with unknown release
time history. J Water Resour 6:337–350
Saaty TL (June 2008) Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making: why
pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors—
the analytic hierarchy/network process (PDF). Review of the Royal Academy of Exact,
Physical and Natural Sciences, Series A: Mathematics (RACSAM). 102(2): 251–318. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.455.3274. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03191825. Retrieved 2008-12-22
Saaty TL, Peniwati K (2008) Group decision making: drawing out and reconciling differences.
RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. ISBN 978-1-888603-08-8
Saracoglu BO (2013) Selecting industrial investment locations in master plans of countries. Eur J
Industr Eng 7(4): 416–441. https://doi.org/10.1504/ejie.2013.055016
Schlager E (2007) In the agricultural groundwater revolution: opportunities and threats to
development. Wallingford, UK
Sugg ZP, Varady RG, Gerlak AK, de Grenade R (2015) Transboundary groundwater governance in
the guarani aquifer system: reflections from a survey of global and regional experts. J Water Int
40:377–400
Sugg ZP, Ziaja S, Schlager EC (2016) Conjunctive groundwater management to socio-ecological
disturbances: a comparison of 4 western U.S States. Texas Water J 7:1–24
USA: Monterey Herald
USA: Sandra Baker
Varady RG, Weert F, Megdal SB, Gerlak A, Iskandar CA, House-Peters L (2010) Groundwater
governance: a global framework for country action. GEF, USA
Varady RG, Zuniga-Teran AA, Gerlak AK, Megdal SB (2016) Modes and approaches of groundwater governance: a survey of lessons learned from selected cases across the globe. J Water
(Switzerland) 8(10):417
Wade R (1987) The management of common-property resources: collective action as an alternative
to privitisation or state regulation. Camb J Econ 11:95–106
Yang J, Lee H (1997) An AHP decision model for facility location selection. Facilities 15(9):241–
254