132
M. Al Muhisen et al.
2. Time lag; Consequences following extraction or pollution require time to become
evident. Therefore, time lags among extraction and succeeding effects provide
water control with some challenges (Prakash and Datta 2014). The procedure for
movement and transportation of groundwater take time. Following the activation
of the sources, or in some cases once the source does not subsist, pollution can
evidently be distinguished (Foster et al. 2013).
3. Indivisibility; It is not possible to confine or even physically shelter aquifers.
However, the susceptibility of an aquifer relies on the form of pollution, extent
of contamination, in addition to its hydrogeology (Kiparsky et al. 2017).
4. Hydrogeological vagueness; Due to the vast disparity in hydrogeology, in addition to the varieties of groundwater consumption, management and control
becomes very complex. Such conditions can be witnessed in regions, like California, in which the ambiguities of aquifer peripheries and overlays in the GSA
(Groundwater Sustainability Agency) limits multiple problems in groundwater
control (Sugg et al. 2016). Surface-groundwater collaborations present difficulties for water control as a result of insufficient management between state organizations. Hydrogeology vagueness generates difficulties in obtaining the amount
of water is contained by the transboundary aquifers in each region. Information is
needed. Similarly, surface water material and groundwater material are generally
of ambiguous trait. Generally, groundwater information is not as accessible as
surface water information. It was advocated by Sugg et al. that for efficiency,
groundwater requires more information material and technical assistances to
serve the groundwater maintenance districts.
5. Construction of abstraction; There is insufficient monitoring not only on the
quantity of wells that are extracted from groundwaters, but also on the amount of
groundwater which wells abstract. For instance, Arizona was required to monitor
the groundwater diminution so that the Central Arizona Project could be built
(Garrick et al. 2011).
6. Material asymmetry; Typically, data on groundwater is restricted and distortedly
alleged, resulting in complications for control. This happens in situations where
water consumers hold better data on their historic water consumption techniques
than the governing administrators (Patterson et al. 2017).
Moreover, size also causes complexities for control and supervision of groundwater. Specific aquifers, like the Ogallala Aquifer located in central United States,
may lie behind thousands of square kilometers. Nevertheless, supervision and effects
of groundwater consumption are explicit to their environment and in some cases location, given the disparity in geology and water consuming features in various sections
of the aquifer (Patterson et al. 2017).
M. Al Muhisen et al.
2. Time lag; Consequences following extraction or pollution require time to become
evident. Therefore, time lags among extraction and succeeding effects provide
water control with some challenges (Prakash and Datta 2014). The procedure for
movement and transportation of groundwater take time. Following the activation
of the sources, or in some cases once the source does not subsist, pollution can
evidently be distinguished (Foster et al. 2013).
3. Indivisibility; It is not possible to confine or even physically shelter aquifers.
However, the susceptibility of an aquifer relies on the form of pollution, extent
of contamination, in addition to its hydrogeology (Kiparsky et al. 2017).
4. Hydrogeological vagueness; Due to the vast disparity in hydrogeology, in addition to the varieties of groundwater consumption, management and control
becomes very complex. Such conditions can be witnessed in regions, like California, in which the ambiguities of aquifer peripheries and overlays in the GSA
(Groundwater Sustainability Agency) limits multiple problems in groundwater
control (Sugg et al. 2016). Surface-groundwater collaborations present difficulties for water control as a result of insufficient management between state organizations. Hydrogeology vagueness generates difficulties in obtaining the amount
of water is contained by the transboundary aquifers in each region. Information is
needed. Similarly, surface water material and groundwater material are generally
of ambiguous trait. Generally, groundwater information is not as accessible as
surface water information. It was advocated by Sugg et al. that for efficiency,
groundwater requires more information material and technical assistances to
serve the groundwater maintenance districts.
5. Construction of abstraction; There is insufficient monitoring not only on the
quantity of wells that are extracted from groundwaters, but also on the amount of
groundwater which wells abstract. For instance, Arizona was required to monitor
the groundwater diminution so that the Central Arizona Project could be built
(Garrick et al. 2011).
6. Material asymmetry; Typically, data on groundwater is restricted and distortedly
alleged, resulting in complications for control. This happens in situations where
water consumers hold better data on their historic water consumption techniques
than the governing administrators (Patterson et al. 2017).
Moreover, size also causes complexities for control and supervision of groundwater. Specific aquifers, like the Ogallala Aquifer located in central United States,
may lie behind thousands of square kilometers. Nevertheless, supervision and effects
of groundwater consumption are explicit to their environment and in some cases location, given the disparity in geology and water consuming features in various sections
of the aquifer (Patterson et al. 2017).