the quality of the information provided by the information system. Seven propositions are formulated and several remedies for information overload are discussed. A
conceptual model is developed to provide a better understanding of the concept of
information overload.
References
Geng, Y., Sarkis, J., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). Sustainability, well-being, and the circular
economy in China and worldwide. Science, 6278(Supplement), 73–76.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision
under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I
(pp. 99–127). World Scientific.
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., McCarthy,
J. J., Schellnhuber, H. J., Bolin, B., & Dickson, N. M. (2001). Sustainability
science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642.
Rezaei, J., Papakonstantinou, A., Tavasszy, L., Pesch, U., & Kana, A. (2019).
Sustainable product-package design in a food supply chain: A multi-criteria life
cycle approach. Packaging Technology and Science, 32(2), 85–101.
Rowe, A. J., Boulgarides, J. D., & McGrath, M. R. (1984). Managerial decision
making. Citeseer.
Sauvé, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P. (2016). Environmental sciences, sustainable
development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary
research. Environmental Development, 17, 48–56.
Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. The
American Economic Review, 69(4), 493–513.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Behavioral decision theory.
Annual Review of Psychology, 28(1), 1–39.
Strategic Decision-Making for Sustainable Management of Industrial Networks
xi