42
K. Kubiak-Wójcicka
42. Projekt polityki wodnej pa´ nstwa do roku 2010 (z uwzgl˛ ednieniem etapu 2016) (2010) Krajowy
Zarz˛ ad Gospodarki Wodnej. https://gwppl.org/data/uploads/warsztaty-konsultacje/dokume
nty_krajowe/Projekt_Polityki_wodnej_panstwa_do_roku_2030_z_uwzglednieniem_etapu_
2016.pdf
43. https://www.kzgw.gov.pl/index.php/pl/jednostki-organizacyjne/mapa-obszarow-dzialania
44. Ayre M, Nettle R (2015) Doing integration in catchment management research: insights into a
dynamic learning process. Environ Sci Policy 47:18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.
10.011
45. ´
Cosi´ c Flajsig G, Belaj M, Carleuša B (2017) Combined approach to surface water management.
Gradevinar 69(8) 617–631. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2063.2017
46. Fan L, Wang H, Lai W, Wang Ch (2015) Administration of water resources in Beijing: problems
and countermeasures. Water Policy 17:563–580. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2014.407
47. Thiel A (2015) Constitutional state structure and scalar re-organization of natural resource
governance: the transformation of polycentric water governance in Spain, Portugal and
Germany. Land Use Policy 45:176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.012
48. Bakker K, Cook C (2011) Water governance in Canada: innovation in the context of
fragmentation. Int J Water Resour Dev 27:275–289
49. Kampa E, Kranz N, Hansen W (2003) Public participation in River Basin management in
Germany: from borders to natural boundaries. Report of Workpackage 4 of the Harmoni COP
Project. Ecologic, Institute for International and European Environmental Policy, Berlin
50. Albrecht J (2013) The Europeanization of water law by the Water Framework Directive: a
second chance for water planning in Germany. Land Use Policy 30:381–391. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.009
51. Voulvoulis N, Arpon KD, Giakoumis T (2017) The EU Water Framework Directive: from great
expectations to problems with implementation. Sci Total Environ 575:358–366. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.228
52. Keskitalo ECH (2015) Actors’ perceptions of issues in the implementation of the first round
of the Water Framework Directive: examples from the water management and forestry sectors
in Southern Sweden. Water 7:2202–2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7052202
53. Benson D, Lorenzoni I (2016) Climate change adaptation, flood risks and policy coherence in
integrated water resources management in England. Reg Environ Changes. https://doi.org/10.
1007/s10113-016-0959-6
54. van den Brink M, Meijerink S (2006) Implementing policy innovations. Resource dependence,
struggle for discursive hegemony and institutional inertia in the Dutch river policy domain.
Working Paper Series. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/45540
55. McDonnell RA (2008) Challenges for integrated water resources management: how do we
provide the knowledge to support truly integrated thinking? Int J Water Resour Dev 24:131–143.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620701723240
56. Mees H, Suykens C, Crabé A (2017) Evaluating conditions for Integrated Water Resource
Management at sub-basin scale. A comparison of the Flemish sub-basin boards and Walloon
river contracts. Environ Policy Gov 27:59–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1736
57. Franzen F, Hammer M, Balfors B (2015) Institutional development for stakeholder participation
in local water management—an analysis of two Swedish catchments. Land Use Policy 43:217–
227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.013
58. Stiller S, Meijerink S (2016) Leadership within regional climate change adaptation networks:
the case of climate adaptation officers in Northern Hesse, Germany. Reg Environ Changes
16:1543–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0886-y
K. Kubiak-Wójcicka
42. Projekt polityki wodnej pa´ nstwa do roku 2010 (z uwzgl˛ ednieniem etapu 2016) (2010) Krajowy
Zarz˛ ad Gospodarki Wodnej. https://gwppl.org/data/uploads/warsztaty-konsultacje/dokume
nty_krajowe/Projekt_Polityki_wodnej_panstwa_do_roku_2030_z_uwzglednieniem_etapu_
2016.pdf
43. https://www.kzgw.gov.pl/index.php/pl/jednostki-organizacyjne/mapa-obszarow-dzialania
44. Ayre M, Nettle R (2015) Doing integration in catchment management research: insights into a
dynamic learning process. Environ Sci Policy 47:18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.
10.011
45. ´
Cosi´ c Flajsig G, Belaj M, Carleuša B (2017) Combined approach to surface water management.
Gradevinar 69(8) 617–631. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2063.2017
46. Fan L, Wang H, Lai W, Wang Ch (2015) Administration of water resources in Beijing: problems
and countermeasures. Water Policy 17:563–580. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2014.407
47. Thiel A (2015) Constitutional state structure and scalar re-organization of natural resource
governance: the transformation of polycentric water governance in Spain, Portugal and
Germany. Land Use Policy 45:176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.012
48. Bakker K, Cook C (2011) Water governance in Canada: innovation in the context of
fragmentation. Int J Water Resour Dev 27:275–289
49. Kampa E, Kranz N, Hansen W (2003) Public participation in River Basin management in
Germany: from borders to natural boundaries. Report of Workpackage 4 of the Harmoni COP
Project. Ecologic, Institute for International and European Environmental Policy, Berlin
50. Albrecht J (2013) The Europeanization of water law by the Water Framework Directive: a
second chance for water planning in Germany. Land Use Policy 30:381–391. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.009
51. Voulvoulis N, Arpon KD, Giakoumis T (2017) The EU Water Framework Directive: from great
expectations to problems with implementation. Sci Total Environ 575:358–366. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.228
52. Keskitalo ECH (2015) Actors’ perceptions of issues in the implementation of the first round
of the Water Framework Directive: examples from the water management and forestry sectors
in Southern Sweden. Water 7:2202–2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7052202
53. Benson D, Lorenzoni I (2016) Climate change adaptation, flood risks and policy coherence in
integrated water resources management in England. Reg Environ Changes. https://doi.org/10.
1007/s10113-016-0959-6
54. van den Brink M, Meijerink S (2006) Implementing policy innovations. Resource dependence,
struggle for discursive hegemony and institutional inertia in the Dutch river policy domain.
Working Paper Series. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/45540
55. McDonnell RA (2008) Challenges for integrated water resources management: how do we
provide the knowledge to support truly integrated thinking? Int J Water Resour Dev 24:131–143.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620701723240
56. Mees H, Suykens C, Crabé A (2017) Evaluating conditions for Integrated Water Resource
Management at sub-basin scale. A comparison of the Flemish sub-basin boards and Walloon
river contracts. Environ Policy Gov 27:59–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1736
57. Franzen F, Hammer M, Balfors B (2015) Institutional development for stakeholder participation
in local water management—an analysis of two Swedish catchments. Land Use Policy 43:217–
227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.013
58. Stiller S, Meijerink S (2016) Leadership within regional climate change adaptation networks:
the case of climate adaptation officers in Northern Hesse, Germany. Reg Environ Changes
16:1543–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0886-y