20 Power Plant Open Cooling System in the Context of the Objectives …
415
References
1. European Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the
council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field
of water policy. Official journal of the European communities, L327/1. Brussels, European
commission
2. Tomaszewska B, Dendys M, Galos K (2017) EIGR – Knowledge base as a tool facilitating the
management of groundwater resources in Europe. Min Res Manag 33(4):79–92. https://doi.
org/10.1515/gospo-2017-0050
3. Tomaszewska B, Tyszer M, Dendys M (2018) The availability of groundwater information
sources in relations to the transposition of the WFD into polish law. Project KINDRA. Therm
Sci Eng Process 5:437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2018.01.018
4. Hering D, Borja A, Carstensen J, Carvalho L, Elliott M, Feld CK, Heiskanen A-S, Johnson RK,
Moe J, Pont D, Lyche SA, van de Bund W (2010) The European water framework directive at
the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Sci
Total Environ 408:4007–4019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.031
5. Carvalho L, Mackay EB, Cristina Cardoso A, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Birk S, Blackstock KL,
Borics G, Borja A, Feld ChK, Ferreira MT, Globevnik L, Grizzetti B, Hendry S, Hering D, Kelly
M, Langaas S, Meissner K, Panagopoulos Y, Penning E, Rouillard J, Sabater S, Schmedtje U,
Spears BM, Venohr M, van de Bund W, Lyche SA (2019) Protecting and restoring Europe’s
waters: an analysis of the future development needs of the water framework directive. Sci Total
Environ 658:1228–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.255
6. Quevauviller P (2011) Adapting to climate change: reducing water-related risks in Europe – EU
policy and research considerations. Environ Sci Pol 14:722–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.env
sci.2011.02.008
7. Cardoso AC, Free G (2008) Incorporating invasive alien species into ecological assessment in
the context of the water framework directive. Aquat Invasions 3(4):361–366. https://doi.org/
10.3391/ai.2008.3.4.1
8. von der Ohe PC, Dulio V, Slobodnik J, De Deckere E, Kühne R, Ebert R-U, Ginebreda A,
De Cooman W, Schüürmann G, Brack W (2011) A new risk assessment approach for the
prioritization of 500 classical and emerging organic microcontaminants as potential river basin
specific pollutants under the European water framework directive. Sci Total Environ 409:2064–
2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.054
9. Blackstock KL, Martin-Ortega J, Spray CJ, im Druck. Implementation of the European water
framework directive: what does taking an ecosystem services-based approach add? In: MartinOrtega J, Ferrier RC, Gordon I, Kahn S (Hrsg.) (2015) Water ecosystem services: a global
perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 57–64
10. Grizzetti B, Lanzanova D, Liquete C, Reynaud A, Cardoso AC (2016) Assessing water
ecosystem services for water resource management. Environ Sci Pol 61:194–203. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008
11. Spears BM, Ives SC, Angeler DG, Allen CR, Birk S, Carvalho L, Cavers S, Daunt F, Morton RD,
Pocock MJO, Rhodes G, Thackeray SJ, Cadotte M (2015) Thackeray. Effective management
of ecological resilience – are we there yet? J Appl Ecol 52:1311–1315. https://doi.org/10.1111/
1365-2664.12497
12. Shepherd E, Milner-Gulland EJ, Knight AT, Ling MA, Darrah S, van Soesbergen A, Burgess ND
(2016) Burgess. Status and trends in global ecosystem services and natural capital: assessing
progress toward Aichi biodiversity target 14. Conserv Lett 9:429–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/
conl.12320
13. The Act of 20.07.2017 r. Water law (Dz. U z 2017 r. poz. 1566 – in Polish)
14. Water management plan for the Vistula River Basin. Monitor Polski no 49, position 549, 2011
(in Polish)
15. Operacz A, Tomaszewska B (2016) The review of polish formal and legal aspects related to
hydropower plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(19):18953–18959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11
356-016-7466-7
415
References
1. European Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the
council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field
of water policy. Official journal of the European communities, L327/1. Brussels, European
commission
2. Tomaszewska B, Dendys M, Galos K (2017) EIGR – Knowledge base as a tool facilitating the
management of groundwater resources in Europe. Min Res Manag 33(4):79–92. https://doi.
org/10.1515/gospo-2017-0050
3. Tomaszewska B, Tyszer M, Dendys M (2018) The availability of groundwater information
sources in relations to the transposition of the WFD into polish law. Project KINDRA. Therm
Sci Eng Process 5:437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2018.01.018
4. Hering D, Borja A, Carstensen J, Carvalho L, Elliott M, Feld CK, Heiskanen A-S, Johnson RK,
Moe J, Pont D, Lyche SA, van de Bund W (2010) The European water framework directive at
the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Sci
Total Environ 408:4007–4019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.031
5. Carvalho L, Mackay EB, Cristina Cardoso A, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Birk S, Blackstock KL,
Borics G, Borja A, Feld ChK, Ferreira MT, Globevnik L, Grizzetti B, Hendry S, Hering D, Kelly
M, Langaas S, Meissner K, Panagopoulos Y, Penning E, Rouillard J, Sabater S, Schmedtje U,
Spears BM, Venohr M, van de Bund W, Lyche SA (2019) Protecting and restoring Europe’s
waters: an analysis of the future development needs of the water framework directive. Sci Total
Environ 658:1228–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.255
6. Quevauviller P (2011) Adapting to climate change: reducing water-related risks in Europe – EU
policy and research considerations. Environ Sci Pol 14:722–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.env
sci.2011.02.008
7. Cardoso AC, Free G (2008) Incorporating invasive alien species into ecological assessment in
the context of the water framework directive. Aquat Invasions 3(4):361–366. https://doi.org/
10.3391/ai.2008.3.4.1
8. von der Ohe PC, Dulio V, Slobodnik J, De Deckere E, Kühne R, Ebert R-U, Ginebreda A,
De Cooman W, Schüürmann G, Brack W (2011) A new risk assessment approach for the
prioritization of 500 classical and emerging organic microcontaminants as potential river basin
specific pollutants under the European water framework directive. Sci Total Environ 409:2064–
2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.054
9. Blackstock KL, Martin-Ortega J, Spray CJ, im Druck. Implementation of the European water
framework directive: what does taking an ecosystem services-based approach add? In: MartinOrtega J, Ferrier RC, Gordon I, Kahn S (Hrsg.) (2015) Water ecosystem services: a global
perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 57–64
10. Grizzetti B, Lanzanova D, Liquete C, Reynaud A, Cardoso AC (2016) Assessing water
ecosystem services for water resource management. Environ Sci Pol 61:194–203. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008
11. Spears BM, Ives SC, Angeler DG, Allen CR, Birk S, Carvalho L, Cavers S, Daunt F, Morton RD,
Pocock MJO, Rhodes G, Thackeray SJ, Cadotte M (2015) Thackeray. Effective management
of ecological resilience – are we there yet? J Appl Ecol 52:1311–1315. https://doi.org/10.1111/
1365-2664.12497
12. Shepherd E, Milner-Gulland EJ, Knight AT, Ling MA, Darrah S, van Soesbergen A, Burgess ND
(2016) Burgess. Status and trends in global ecosystem services and natural capital: assessing
progress toward Aichi biodiversity target 14. Conserv Lett 9:429–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/
conl.12320
13. The Act of 20.07.2017 r. Water law (Dz. U z 2017 r. poz. 1566 – in Polish)
14. Water management plan for the Vistula River Basin. Monitor Polski no 49, position 549, 2011
(in Polish)
15. Operacz A, Tomaszewska B (2016) The review of polish formal and legal aspects related to
hydropower plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(19):18953–18959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11
356-016-7466-7