3 The United Nations Convention …
63
aspects during the process of establishing and rebuilding marine order and rules.
That is to change from being a conformist to a formulator of marine rules, from a
“vague” interpreter to an “accurate” speaker of marine rules, from an implementer
to a supervisor, from a “distinctive” one to a general player of marine rules, and
from a receiver to a provider of marine rules. In order to realize the above-mentioned
goals, especially to become a leader in maintaining marine order and establishing
marine rules and becoming a provider of marine public goods, China needs to take
many measures in a focused and systematic manner and make continuous efforts to
strengthen research on theories and relevant judicial cases in relation to the UNCLOS,
enrich and improve the legal system of the sea by combining national practices. There
is therefore a long way for China to go as it embarks going forward on maintaining
the marine order, improving marine rules and strengthening the marine management
mechanism.
References
Gao, Z., & Jia, B. B. (2013). The nine-dash line in the South China Sea: History, status and
implications . The American Journal of International Law, 107(1), 98–124.
Gao, Z., & Jia, B. B. (2014) The Nine-dash line in the South China Sea: History, status and
implications (2014 Edn., pp. 1–49). China Ocean Press.
Jia, B. B. (2016). Rebuttal against the Fallacy of Argument on the Historic Rights in South China
Sea in No. 143 Limits in the Sea of the USA Department of State, Law Review ((4), pp. 76–82).
Jennings, R., & Watts, A. (Eds.). (1995).Oppenheim’s international law (Vol. 1, Ninth Edn., pp. 31–
32), translated by Wang Tieya, Chen Gongchuo, etc., Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.
Jennings, R., & Watts, A. (2011). Oppenheim’s international law (Vol. 1, Ninth Edn., pp. 53–54)
Oxford University Press.
Keyuan, Z. (2001). History rights in international law and in China’s practice. Ocean Development
and International Law, 32(2), 149–168.
Kanehara, A. (2016). What Does A New International Legally Binding Instrument On Marine
Biological Diversity Of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction “under the UNCLOS” Mean? Sophia
Law Review, 59(4), 53–73.
Lingliang, Z., & Rao, Y. (Eds.). (2005). International law (pp. 110–113). Law Press.
Mizukami, C. (2004). Formation of freedom of the sea (1). Hiroshima Hougaku, 28(1), 1–2.
Ozaki, S. (1996). Aegean sea continental shelf case. In: R. Hatano, and S. Ozaki (Eds.), International
court of justice: its judgments and advisory opinions (Vol. II (1964–1993), p. 129 and p. 146),
Kokusai Shoin.
Okuwaki, N. (2015). The Cooperation Obligations under the UNCLOS, The Practice of International
Law edited by ShunjiYanai, Shinya Murase, Shinzansha (pp. 409–454).
Pedrozo, R. (2018). Military activities in the exclusive economic zone: East Asia focus, The Journal
of Island Studies, 7(2), 79.
Souji, Y. (2000). Comparative study on domestic legal system concerning marine scientific research
in the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf, investigation report on various domestic
legal systems dealing with marine scientific research in the exclusive economic zone and the
continental shelf (pp. 2–3) edited by The Japan Institute of International Affairs.
Sohn, L. B. etc. (2014). The law of the Sea in a Nutshell (2nd Edn., p. 17), Translated by Fu
Kuncheng, etc., Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
Sohn, L. B., Juras, K. G., Noyes, J. E., & Franckx, E. (2010). Law of the Sea in a Nutshell (2nd
Edn., p. 30). Thomson Reuters.
63
aspects during the process of establishing and rebuilding marine order and rules.
That is to change from being a conformist to a formulator of marine rules, from a
“vague” interpreter to an “accurate” speaker of marine rules, from an implementer
to a supervisor, from a “distinctive” one to a general player of marine rules, and
from a receiver to a provider of marine rules. In order to realize the above-mentioned
goals, especially to become a leader in maintaining marine order and establishing
marine rules and becoming a provider of marine public goods, China needs to take
many measures in a focused and systematic manner and make continuous efforts to
strengthen research on theories and relevant judicial cases in relation to the UNCLOS,
enrich and improve the legal system of the sea by combining national practices. There
is therefore a long way for China to go as it embarks going forward on maintaining
the marine order, improving marine rules and strengthening the marine management
mechanism.
References
Gao, Z., & Jia, B. B. (2013). The nine-dash line in the South China Sea: History, status and
implications . The American Journal of International Law, 107(1), 98–124.
Gao, Z., & Jia, B. B. (2014) The Nine-dash line in the South China Sea: History, status and
implications (2014 Edn., pp. 1–49). China Ocean Press.
Jia, B. B. (2016). Rebuttal against the Fallacy of Argument on the Historic Rights in South China
Sea in No. 143 Limits in the Sea of the USA Department of State, Law Review ((4), pp. 76–82).
Jennings, R., & Watts, A. (Eds.). (1995).Oppenheim’s international law (Vol. 1, Ninth Edn., pp. 31–
32), translated by Wang Tieya, Chen Gongchuo, etc., Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.
Jennings, R., & Watts, A. (2011). Oppenheim’s international law (Vol. 1, Ninth Edn., pp. 53–54)
Oxford University Press.
Keyuan, Z. (2001). History rights in international law and in China’s practice. Ocean Development
and International Law, 32(2), 149–168.
Kanehara, A. (2016). What Does A New International Legally Binding Instrument On Marine
Biological Diversity Of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction “under the UNCLOS” Mean? Sophia
Law Review, 59(4), 53–73.
Lingliang, Z., & Rao, Y. (Eds.). (2005). International law (pp. 110–113). Law Press.
Mizukami, C. (2004). Formation of freedom of the sea (1). Hiroshima Hougaku, 28(1), 1–2.
Ozaki, S. (1996). Aegean sea continental shelf case. In: R. Hatano, and S. Ozaki (Eds.), International
court of justice: its judgments and advisory opinions (Vol. II (1964–1993), p. 129 and p. 146),
Kokusai Shoin.
Okuwaki, N. (2015). The Cooperation Obligations under the UNCLOS, The Practice of International
Law edited by ShunjiYanai, Shinya Murase, Shinzansha (pp. 409–454).
Pedrozo, R. (2018). Military activities in the exclusive economic zone: East Asia focus, The Journal
of Island Studies, 7(2), 79.
Souji, Y. (2000). Comparative study on domestic legal system concerning marine scientific research
in the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf, investigation report on various domestic
legal systems dealing with marine scientific research in the exclusive economic zone and the
continental shelf (pp. 2–3) edited by The Japan Institute of International Affairs.
Sohn, L. B. etc. (2014). The law of the Sea in a Nutshell (2nd Edn., p. 17), Translated by Fu
Kuncheng, etc., Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
Sohn, L. B., Juras, K. G., Noyes, J. E., & Franckx, E. (2010). Law of the Sea in a Nutshell (2nd
Edn., p. 30). Thomson Reuters.