202
D. Przywara and A. Rak
Fig. 4 Initial and modified (blue) table of schedule activities after the first stage of registration:
Intro-duction of the second working shift to perform the sequence of activities 10–15; Source Own
study based on calculations of the Planista Max computer program [12]
November 16, 2015 and supplying activities with additional means of production.
Increased labor flows were evenly distributed over the duration of individual work
shifts in the project.
Figure 5 depicts the distribution of the total schedule delay using milestones in
which the required deadlines for completing actions 10–15 have been given feasibility
intervals (“no later than”).
Fig. 5 Distribution of the total delay of the schedule using milestones until the second stage of
registration: period 17.11.2015–31.12.2015 (activities: green—actual implementation, yellow—
planned performance, red—costs incurred). Description in the text; Source Own study based on
calculations of the Planista Max computer program [12]
D. Przywara and A. Rak
Fig. 4 Initial and modified (blue) table of schedule activities after the first stage of registration:
Intro-duction of the second working shift to perform the sequence of activities 10–15; Source Own
study based on calculations of the Planista Max computer program [12]
November 16, 2015 and supplying activities with additional means of production.
Increased labor flows were evenly distributed over the duration of individual work
shifts in the project.
Figure 5 depicts the distribution of the total schedule delay using milestones in
which the required deadlines for completing actions 10–15 have been given feasibility
intervals (“no later than”).
Fig. 5 Distribution of the total delay of the schedule using milestones until the second stage of
registration: period 17.11.2015–31.12.2015 (activities: green—actual implementation, yellow—
planned performance, red—costs incurred). Description in the text; Source Own study based on
calculations of the Planista Max computer program [12]