178
M. W˛ asowicz
limitations. We can suppose that with such new tools, illusions created in digital
environments will be truly indistinguishable from reality [4].
References
1. Williamson TJ, Williamson T, Radford A, Bennetts H (2003) Understanding sustainable
architecture. Taylor & Francis
2. Vorländer M, Schröder D, Pelzer S, Wefers F (2015) Virtual reality for architectural acoustics.
J Build Perform Simul 8(1):15–25
3. Slater M (2014) Grand challenges in virtual environments. Front Robot AI 1:3
4. Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV (2016) Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Front
Robot AI 3:74
5. Kuliga SF, Thrash T, Dalton RC, Hölscher C (2015) Virtual reality as an empirical research
tool—exploring user experience in a real building and a corresponding virtual model. Environ
Urban Syst 54:363–375
6. Palmon O, Sahar M, Wiess LP, Oxman R (2006) Virtual environments for the evaluation of
human performance: towards virtual occupancy evaluation in designed environments (VOE).
In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design
Research in Kumamoto, Japan, pp 521–528
7. Schneider S, Kuliga S, Hölscher C, Dalton RC, Kunert A, Kulik A, Donath D (2013) Educating
architecture students to design buildings from the inside out: experiences from a research-based
design studio. In: Kim YO, Park HT, Seo KW (eds) Proceedings of the 9th International Space
Syntax Symposium, Seoul, South-Korea. Sejong University, Seoul
8. Johnson A (2009) Visualisation techniques, human perception and the built environment.
Northumbria Working Paper Ser Interdisc Stud Built Virtual Environ 2(2):93–103
9. Skorupka A (2009) Comparing human way finding behavior in real and virtual environment.
In: Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm, pp 1–7
10. Werner S, Schindler LE (2004) The role of spatial reference frames in architecture:
misalignment impairs way-finding performance. Environ Behav 36(4):461–482
11. Haq S, Hill G, Pramanik A (2005) Comparison of configurational, wayfinding and cognitive
correlates in real and virtual settings. In: 5th International Space Syntax Symposium. Delft
University of Technology, Techne Press, The Netherlands
12. Campos J, Nusseck H-G, Wallraven C, Mohle BJ, Bülthoff HH (2007) Visualization and
(Mis)Perceptions in Virtual Reality, Tagungsband 10. Workshop Sichtsysteme, pp 10–14
13. Wu B, Ooi T-L, He Z (2007) Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of
integrating ground information. Nature 428:73–77
14. Banton T, Stefanucci J, Durgin F, Fass A, Proffitt D (2005) The perception of walking speed
in a virtual environment. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 14(4):394–406
15. Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press
16. Westerdahl B, Suneson K, Wernemyr C, Roupe M, Johansson M, Allwood CM (2006)
Users’ evaluation of a virtual reality architectural model compared with the experience of
the completed building. Autom Constr 15:150–165
17. De Kort Y, Ijsselsteijn W, Kooijman J, Schuurmans Y (2003) Virtual laboratories comparability
of real and virtual environments for environmental psychology. Presence 12:360–373
18. Sutherland IE (1965) The ultimate display, multimedia: from wagner to virtual reality, pp
506–508
19. Minsky M (1980) Telepresence. Omni 2(9):45–52
20. ISO DIS 9241 – 210, Tech. rep., International Organization for Standardization (2010)
21. Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence
questionnaire. Presence 7(3):225–240
M. W˛ asowicz
limitations. We can suppose that with such new tools, illusions created in digital
environments will be truly indistinguishable from reality [4].
References
1. Williamson TJ, Williamson T, Radford A, Bennetts H (2003) Understanding sustainable
architecture. Taylor & Francis
2. Vorländer M, Schröder D, Pelzer S, Wefers F (2015) Virtual reality for architectural acoustics.
J Build Perform Simul 8(1):15–25
3. Slater M (2014) Grand challenges in virtual environments. Front Robot AI 1:3
4. Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV (2016) Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Front
Robot AI 3:74
5. Kuliga SF, Thrash T, Dalton RC, Hölscher C (2015) Virtual reality as an empirical research
tool—exploring user experience in a real building and a corresponding virtual model. Environ
Urban Syst 54:363–375
6. Palmon O, Sahar M, Wiess LP, Oxman R (2006) Virtual environments for the evaluation of
human performance: towards virtual occupancy evaluation in designed environments (VOE).
In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design
Research in Kumamoto, Japan, pp 521–528
7. Schneider S, Kuliga S, Hölscher C, Dalton RC, Kunert A, Kulik A, Donath D (2013) Educating
architecture students to design buildings from the inside out: experiences from a research-based
design studio. In: Kim YO, Park HT, Seo KW (eds) Proceedings of the 9th International Space
Syntax Symposium, Seoul, South-Korea. Sejong University, Seoul
8. Johnson A (2009) Visualisation techniques, human perception and the built environment.
Northumbria Working Paper Ser Interdisc Stud Built Virtual Environ 2(2):93–103
9. Skorupka A (2009) Comparing human way finding behavior in real and virtual environment.
In: Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm, pp 1–7
10. Werner S, Schindler LE (2004) The role of spatial reference frames in architecture:
misalignment impairs way-finding performance. Environ Behav 36(4):461–482
11. Haq S, Hill G, Pramanik A (2005) Comparison of configurational, wayfinding and cognitive
correlates in real and virtual settings. In: 5th International Space Syntax Symposium. Delft
University of Technology, Techne Press, The Netherlands
12. Campos J, Nusseck H-G, Wallraven C, Mohle BJ, Bülthoff HH (2007) Visualization and
(Mis)Perceptions in Virtual Reality, Tagungsband 10. Workshop Sichtsysteme, pp 10–14
13. Wu B, Ooi T-L, He Z (2007) Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of
integrating ground information. Nature 428:73–77
14. Banton T, Stefanucci J, Durgin F, Fass A, Proffitt D (2005) The perception of walking speed
in a virtual environment. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 14(4):394–406
15. Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press
16. Westerdahl B, Suneson K, Wernemyr C, Roupe M, Johansson M, Allwood CM (2006)
Users’ evaluation of a virtual reality architectural model compared with the experience of
the completed building. Autom Constr 15:150–165
17. De Kort Y, Ijsselsteijn W, Kooijman J, Schuurmans Y (2003) Virtual laboratories comparability
of real and virtual environments for environmental psychology. Presence 12:360–373
18. Sutherland IE (1965) The ultimate display, multimedia: from wagner to virtual reality, pp
506–508
19. Minsky M (1980) Telepresence. Omni 2(9):45–52
20. ISO DIS 9241 – 210, Tech. rep., International Organization for Standardization (2010)
21. Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence
questionnaire. Presence 7(3):225–240