upon international judicial institutions to exercise self-restraint and to restrict themselves to passing judgement on a dispute only to the extent that the Convention and
the States entrust them with jurisdiction. This does not mean that judicial bodies can
sidestep their duty to pass comprehensive judgement on cases validly submitted to
them. However, the need for judicial self-restraint where appropriate needs to be
emphasized.
4
I am confident that this volume constitutes an important contribution to efforts of
international community to achieve a comprehensive fare governance of ocean
affairs.
International Tribunal for the Law
of the Sea, Hamburg, Germany
New York, USA
May 2019
Vladimir Golitsyn
4 Golitsyn (2019) Adjudication of maritime disputes. In: Elvik G, Clifton M-J, Haas T, Lourenço L,
Schwiesow K (eds) The art of judicial reasoning, festschrift in honour of carl baudenbacher.
Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 207–208.
viii
Foreword
the States entrust them with jurisdiction. This does not mean that judicial bodies can
sidestep their duty to pass comprehensive judgement on cases validly submitted to
them. However, the need for judicial self-restraint where appropriate needs to be
emphasized.
4
I am confident that this volume constitutes an important contribution to efforts of
international community to achieve a comprehensive fare governance of ocean
affairs.
International Tribunal for the Law
of the Sea, Hamburg, Germany
New York, USA
May 2019
Vladimir Golitsyn
4 Golitsyn (2019) Adjudication of maritime disputes. In: Elvik G, Clifton M-J, Haas T, Lourenço L,
Schwiesow K (eds) The art of judicial reasoning, festschrift in honour of carl baudenbacher.
Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 207–208.
viii
Foreword